FAST LSXR 102mm LS7 intake manifold reserve list (no financial commitment required)
03-17-2009, 07:55 AM
#1
FAST LSXR 102mm LS7 intake manifold reserve list (no financial commitment required) I'm trying to get an idea on how many manifolds to order on our first shipment. If you are planning on purchasing, please reply simply with +1 or +# (quantity you are requesting) and I will edit this first post. No financial commitment is required. Pricing has not been set yet but I guarantee we will be competitive.
I will be editing this list as you post your requests.
This does not guarantee that delivery will be made in this order. To guarantee your order, please pre-order on our website. http://store.katechengines.com/Product127 This way we will have your credit card information and ensure the fastest possible shipment. If you do not want to make the financial commitment you can do it this way.
EDIT: Pricing has been established. $974.99. Pre-order on our website to be the first to receive.
1. c5racr1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
I will be editing this list as you post your requests.
This does not guarantee that delivery will be made in this order. To guarantee your order, please pre-order on our website. http://store.katechengines.com/Product127 This way we will have your credit card information and ensure the fastest possible shipment. If you do not want to make the financial commitment you can do it this way.
EDIT: Pricing has been established. $974.99. Pre-order on our website to be the first to receive.
1. c5racr1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Last edited by Katech_Jason; 04-02-2009 at 10:18 AM.
Trending Topics
03-17-2009, 04:56 PM
#9
From my understanding, it is in fact the same manifold as the L92/L76 version, except it has different runners. The new LSXR manifold can swap between LS3/LS7 runners according to their catalog.
I'm VERY surprised by the results! Thats a clean 15-20 rwhp on a MILD setup. Could be closer to 30rwhp on a more radical setup. I wonder how it would compare to a ported GM LS7 manifold? Regardless, looking good!
Thanks for posting!
I'm VERY surprised by the results! Thats a clean 15-20 rwhp on a MILD setup. Could be closer to 30rwhp on a more radical setup. I wonder how it would compare to a ported GM LS7 manifold? Regardless, looking good!
Thanks for posting!
03-17-2009, 05:45 PM
#10
From my understanding, it is in fact the same manifold as the L92/L76 version, except it has different runners. The new LSXR manifold can swap between LS3/LS7 runners according to their catalog.
I'm VERY surprised by the results! Thats a clean 15-20 rwhp on a MILD setup. Could be closer to 30rwhp on a more radical setup. I wonder how it would compare to a ported GM LS7 manifold? Regardless, looking good!
Thanks for posting!
I'm VERY surprised by the results! Thats a clean 15-20 rwhp on a MILD setup. Could be closer to 30rwhp on a more radical setup. I wonder how it would compare to a ported GM LS7 manifold? Regardless, looking good!
Thanks for posting!
Right, I misread. I was thinking of the 92mm manifold.
03-17-2009, 09:18 PM
#16
Teching In
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my understanding, it is in fact the same manifold as the L92/L76 version, except it has different runners. The new LSXR manifold can swap between LS3/LS7 runners according to their catalog.
I'm VERY surprised by the results! Thats a clean 15-20 rwhp on a MILD setup. Could be closer to 30rwhp on a more radical setup. I wonder how it would compare to a ported GM LS7 manifold? Regardless, looking good!
Thanks for posting!
I'm VERY surprised by the results! Thats a clean 15-20 rwhp on a MILD setup. Could be closer to 30rwhp on a more radical setup. I wonder how it would compare to a ported GM LS7 manifold? Regardless, looking good!
Thanks for posting!
03-18-2009, 03:00 PM
#17
Yes, it was done on an engine dyno. Thats how they post most if not all of their numbers. I mis-read the numbers, thought they gained 30 fwhp, not 15. So, it would show a bit of improvement on a chassis dyno, probably around 7-10rwhp, but thats just conjecture. Remember this is a MILD setup; on a more radical setup, the gains would be greater.
03-18-2009, 07:10 PM
#18
Since the LS7 market is much smaller than the LS3/L92, I'm guessing it may be priced slightly cheaper even, maybe $100 less.
Last edited by Hans Grüber; 03-18-2009 at 07:24 PM.
03-18-2009, 07:38 PM
#19
03-18-2009, 07:48 PM
#20
Theres a typo on that page, I can see it already... They put "LS3" gains 30+ HP, where they meant to put "LS7". The graph matches, and is for the LS7.
They are claiming 14HP on the L92/LS3 manifold. I saw it at PRI and SEMA, Ive been paying attention since I am waiting for one myself.
They are claiming 14HP on the L92/LS3 manifold. I saw it at PRI and SEMA, Ive been paying attention since I am waiting for one myself.
Last edited by SweetS10V8; 03-18-2009 at 07:55 PM.