Camming an LS2: stock 243 vs stock 823 / L92 heads
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've asked this in another form in another section but I think I just wasn't being specific enough and was in the wrong section. So I'm going to be more specific here in hopes of more specific answers.
I'm going to cam my stock LS2. I have the stock 243 heads and also new stock complete 823 heads. I wouldn't spend the money on porting even if I had it, just dollars/hp gain its not worth it to me. That being the case, which head would you use?
Probably going to run a carb intake.
I'm going to cam my stock LS2. I have the stock 243 heads and also new stock complete 823 heads. I wouldn't spend the money on porting even if I had it, just dollars/hp gain its not worth it to me. That being the case, which head would you use?
Probably going to run a carb intake.
Trending Topics
#9
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not particularly after low end torque, moreso just an even torque curve and more power. How "big" the cam is matters not to me, just looking for some more power as I make the switch to propane. If I was sacrificing 50hp below 3000 rpm for 50 in the top, it wouldn't be worth it. But if I could loose 20 below 3000 to gain 80+ above that would be fine. The dual quad intake is mandatory.