MAhle Ring end gap?
My Mahle rings, which had the directions in the box, actually recommend the second ring be at a smaller gap than the top ring (NA was bore X .0045 for top, and bore X .0035 for 2nd). Thought this was a bit odd and asked tech support at Mahle and they said it is best for oil control, and the directions are mainly for someone who is simply rebuilding an engine for the first time, not a performance minded rebuild where the builder would already have the know-how and experience/preference on their own ring gaps. And he agreed that many people do build with larger second ring gap for higher performance, contrary to their directions' recommendations.
...unfortunately for me, I already filed my rings to have the top larger... Now I'm wondering if I should open up the 2nd ring gaps larger?? and how large is too large of a gap...?
Trending Topics
You can buy the top rings individually, as many as needed...
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I ended up opening up so all rings, top and 2nd, are right around .022. My 2nd rings were all around .016-.018 when I wrote the above reply and I was concerned with my top rings, and also the difference between the two. I think the biggest gap out of all of them was a .026 though, and I wish I could replace it....
I actually called Mahle customer service about it and the guy said I'd prbably be fine though and he was saying .022 would be most ideal, but I shouldn't pull my hair out over one .026.
And he also said that they only sell (supposed to go through a dealer) rings in sets per cylinder, not indvidually.
But anyway, they're all installed now, and the one with the big end gap is on cylinder 7, so I'll keep an eye on it and possibly test compression just for the hell of it. Oh, and the 2nd ring under it is a .022 though, so hopefully not too much more oil consumption than any of the other cylinders... what'ya think?






