N/A LSx H&C stroker VS Forced Induction stock cubed LSx?? Needs Advice - LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

View Poll Results: Which is better for a 4200 LBS daily driver w/the least hassles
N/A H&C 416 ci LS3 based stroker 6 37.50%
Supercharged stock cubed LS2/LS3/LQ9 10 62.50%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

N/A LSx H&C stroker VS Forced Induction stock cubed LSx?? Needs Advice

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-14-2012, 12:42 PM   #1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 80
Default N/A LSx H&C stroker VS Forced Induction stock cubed LSx?? Needs Advice

I have a 4200 LBS 1995 Caprice 9C1 into which I want to do a LSx conversion with a 6L80e/6L90e transmission and the performance goals of 525 RWHP/500 RWTQ.

I would like your opinion on what direct direction to go for my LSx conversion.

I was leaning towards a iron block N/A 408 ci LQ based stroker or a N/A 417 ci LS3/L92 based stroker with CNC ported heads and cam. But a Tech at a supercharging shop, said that since I want a high performance street motor and not to compete in any particular racing class and the car is a daily driver. That I should consider a centifugal blower in the low boost range (like 5 to 9.5 psi) on a pull out LSx motor from a junkyard. LS2 (6 Liters)and above to a LS3/L92. This would save money on head porting and give me at least 600 RWHP/600 RWTQ to 700 RWHP/650 RWTQ along with stock street manners and way better driveability and gas mileage than a H&C stroker. Don't have to worry about things like a high stall torque converter, shitty around town gas mileage and numerically highgears. I do want to go back to 3.08 rear gears. Sound I like have your cake and eat it too scenerio. I am starting to see why there so many guys around here that are into Grand Nationals and Regal T-Types

While all this is tempting especiallly the 600 RWHP. I am not too kean on slaping a blower on junk LSx with miles on it and stock rotating assembly. Esp the rods and the pistons. I heard that the stock cast crank is tough stuff and can handle 750 FWHP and not break.

Can you please explain to me the logic and the cost of the blower route as opposed to a N/A Heads & Cam Stroker???

What are the pros and cons of either route??

I heard that the FI route requires a lot of supporting mods that addtional fuel pumps, water/methanol injection, etc etc. Is it worth it.??

Can a N/A 416 ci stroker be as daily driver friendly as a forced induction stock cubed LSx??

Which option has the least hassles in installation and operation??

Your thoughts and comments.
B'klyn9C1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 06:28 PM   #2
On The Tree
canada4g63's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 180

If your goal is mid 500's then a 4.8/5.3 with a 76mm and 7psi will make that all day, and be half as cheap as a N/A 408.
canada4g63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 07:00 PM   #3
9 Second Club
UBoysPlayBall?'s Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 30

^ what he said.
UBoysPlayBall? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2012, 12:07 PM   #4
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stafford VA
Posts: 84

If it is a daily driver go the supercharged route. Strokers are expensive. My 416 is fun to drive but man does it get crappy gas mileage. Traffic is a no-no.
bnvus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2012, 01:04 PM   #5
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
R6cowboy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 703

Get a good low mileage 4.8L, 5.3L or 6.0L which on average will be much cheaper then a LS1 or LS2. Add a nice Vortech or Procharger setup at 5 to 10 psi with required supporting mods (which you would also need for a big stroker anyways) and you can see mid 500's whp with nice daily driving capabilities. The blower route will be much better for a DD then a big stroker at the same power level.
R6cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:26 PM   #6
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 532

I voted for FI as a mild build will have nice driving characteristics with your heavy car and still be able to make 500 or more rwhp. If you get greedy and want 600 or more, you really should upgrade to forged pistons/rods in stock size, port the heads and change the cam. Reliability is what you really want and with stock pistons you are only 1 bad tank of gas away from a problem.

Be careful of hidden costs in developing you budget for FI. 600 rwhp requires upgrades from radiator to rear end and fuel tank.
COPO9560 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 12:01 PM   #7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 661

Originally Posted by canada4g63 View Post
If your goal is mid 500's then a 4.8/5.3 with a 76mm and 7psi will make that all day, and be half as cheap as a N/A 408.

Or if you can, find you centri-blower as others have stated. If it was my choice, I'd go for a TVS-1900 or 2300 on a forged bottom end, just due to the amount of torque off idle. That's what gets these boats moving!
GA95DCMSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 06:20 PM   #8
MisterD's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sunny Sothern California
Posts: 283

Subscribed! I was looking everywhere for a thread like this. I am swapping a pull out LS1 into a 67 camaro. I was debating selling the LS1 and going LS3 early in the swap because of different reluctor wheel, engine harness etc. BUT I was also considering keeping what I have, get it running N/A, add a TVS1900 and drive it until the engine is tired. Then I can pull the tired LS1, keep the TVS and purchase a shortblock LS1 or equivalent, swap everything over and be good to go. Really want to stay around 450-500 RWHP max., I don't like breaking running gear... Anyway, thanks for posting this...
MisterD is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fastest 346ci with no power adder 5.7stroker Chevrolet Camaro 1967-2002 4 09-10-2015 04:47 PM
stroker build vs forced induction costs? c u in rearveiw Generation IV Internal Engine 4 09-20-2014 06:43 AM
D1SC set-ups.....how much HP/TQ are you making...... LS6427 Forced Induction 127 03-29-2014 06:20 PM
What is so magical about turboing a stock 5.3 liter LM7?? B'klyn9C1 Forced Induction 44 11-02-2012 11:55 PM
For a Daily Driver: LS3 based 417 ci or 427 ci ????? B'klyn9C1 Generation IV Internal Engine 14 02-07-2012 01:41 PM

2004, 2010, 408, 416, 600, 700rwhp, based, ci, crank, gto, lq9, ls2, ls3, na, rwhp, stock, stroker, turbo

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Your question will be posted in: