Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Difference in cnc ported heads vs non cnc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2012, 09:44 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
tjb406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chester ohio
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Difference in cnc ported heads vs non cnc

about how much difference is there in ls3 cnc v/s ls3 non cnc heads? going on 408 with flat tops and comp cam with 231 247 @.050 and .617 .624 lift
Old 11-24-2012, 10:37 PM
  #2  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,311
Received 3,360 Likes on 2,078 Posts

Default

Are you asking about flow data, or pricing? Either one really depends on who's program the heads are cut on. Consequently the increase is substantial for both also. Unless your building a race engine, I personally wouldn't bother, as the ls3 heads flow pretty well in stock form, and its hard to justify the price of a CNC head on a daily driver.
Old 11-24-2012, 10:53 PM
  #3  
Launching!
 
Zfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Allen,TX.
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have read that the as cast stock heads flow near 330 cfm, not too shabby for untouched castings.
Old 11-25-2012, 07:06 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Just have the exhaust and bowl area done. The intake side flows stupid good for a stock head but the runner is already big enough, maling it even larger may hurt your low end.
Old 11-25-2012, 08:12 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
tjb406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chester ohio
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

was refering to power or flow data. i can easily find price data.its not a daily driver but will see street time. going in a 81 camaro with a 4l80e 3.73 gears will also retain the fuel injection ,but havent decided on stock style or carb style throttle body.
Old 11-25-2012, 01:29 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Assuming a composite intake. With that cam...not much difference. With the appropriate cam...15-30HP depending on everything else being correct.

Horrible cam for these heads. Been there-done that.
Old 11-25-2012, 04:14 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm surprised that you say that is not a good cam?
I think Comp Cams recommends that grind for rectangle port heads.
Old 11-25-2012, 05:25 PM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
twinturbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tjb406
about how much difference is there in ls3 cnc v/s ls3 non cnc heads? going on 408 with flat tops and comp cam with 231 247 @.050 and .617 .624 lift


what lsA
Old 11-26-2012, 09:28 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dyno Junkie
I'm surprised that you say that is not a good cam?
I think Comp Cams recommends that grind for rectangle port heads.
Maybe for a rectangular port LS7 head. I will only speak to a very similar cam I tried early on. It was a dog and almost impossible to tune for good drivability.
Old 11-26-2012, 09:37 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
weldermike27408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 188
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ive heard the LS3 heads dont like a lot of duration ... isn't 4.00" bore kinda small for them too
Old 11-26-2012, 09:57 AM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Ive heard the LS3 heads dont like a lot of duration
They like more duration on the exhaust side due to the poor flow compared to the intake side, but not that much split.

isn't 4.00" bore kinda small for them too
It's the minimum required, but it will work.
Old 11-26-2012, 07:01 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
tjb406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chester ohio
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

intake center line 109 lobe sep is 113. its the comp cam 281lrr hr-113. it was recomended for the rectangle port heads, thats y i chose it.
Old 11-26-2012, 08:47 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

The stock LS3 heads have a poor EX. to IN. flow ratio and usually need 12-16
degrees more cam timing on the exhaust side. The CNC versions tend to get
that ratio in the 70-75 % in which case you wouldn't need nearly as much
split. Texas Speed, EPS, or Tick can get you dialed in on the right numbers
for what you want the engine to behave like.
Old 11-26-2012, 08:50 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thats a pretty huge split. I see folks like pat g and tony saying more than 12* split is hurting more than helping most of the time.
Old 11-27-2012, 04:46 AM
  #15  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tjb406
intake center line 109 lobe sep is 113. its the comp cam 281lrr hr-113. it was recomended for the rectangle port heads, thats y i chose it.



I thought that was the cam you where referring to.

In our cam only LS3 I went with 231 239 .617 .624 113, it's a very "torque" cam with great mid range.
Old 11-27-2012, 08:47 AM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
Thats a pretty huge split. I see folks like pat g and tony saying more than 12* split is hurting more than helping most of the time.
If that's true, then they are contradicting what Geoff@EPS has on his site.

http://www.engpwrsys.com/index.php?act=viewCat&catId=19
Old 11-27-2012, 11:58 AM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

"In our cam only LS3 I went with 231 239 .617 .624 113, it's a very "torque" cam with great mid range."

That is darn close to my TSP VVT-3 camshaft going on my L92. Good news on the torque.
Old 11-27-2012, 12:20 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
tjb406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chester ohio
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i hope it is as good as 1989gta states. i have always been in big and small block chevys before this is my first ls style engine. hoping for good results.
Old 11-27-2012, 09:06 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I've run 5 or 6 cams with l92 heads going back to 2006. 18, 10, 8, 6 degrees split. The 18 was by far the worst. The 6 was very good, the 10 was a little better but also a little different. I run 8 degrees now and it's excellent in the 427. Only the 6 degree 234-240 112 +0 was conventional XE-R lobes and it was a very good all around cam. I ran ICL's at 109, 110, 111 and 112. People - 2C5S - have made very good power with as little as 2 degrees. I still think keeping the ICL in that range is where it should be. Keeping CR reasonable so you can run 28 degrees of timing is critical to making power. For me that was 11:3 - 11:4 with 93 octane.

Just my $.03 but do whatever...



Quick Reply: Difference in cnc ported heads vs non cnc



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.