Mild build: 5.3, 6.0, or 6.2 for DD family truckster?
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mild build: 5.3, 6.0, or 6.2 for DD family truckster?
My Sierra is pushing 200k and I'm thinking about a mild motor build. I'm looking for around 450hp. This is my DD that gets about 15k miles a year and taken on family vacations. With that said for a mild build, which one would you pick? Is the 6.2 worth the extra cost of everything over the 6.0? Should I go with either of those over the 5.3? I will be pulling a trailer sometimes and a loaded truck at times too. So low end is more important to me than spinning past 7k. Or keep the 5.3 and do an lsa blower swap?
#4
6.2
I swapped a L9H 6.2 into my 2010 truck,
I used a 2011 L9H, this was a PNP for me.
everything fit from my 5.3, VVT no AFM/DOD
I love it. all i needed was a ECM flash from
the Silverado the eng came from.
I used a 2011 L9H, this was a PNP for me.
everything fit from my 5.3, VVT no AFM/DOD
I love it. all i needed was a ECM flash from
the Silverado the eng came from.
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
6.2 all day long man. The 6.2 is such a step up from the 5.3 and 6.0 it's absurd.
#6
TECH Senior Member
+1 on the 6.2. Why go less when you have a choice? Especially if you're gonna tow. The 6.2 torque will be VERY welcome ahead of a trailer!
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
All have the same stroke, so that is a wash. The 6.0L bore of 4.000" doesn't shroud the valves like the 5.3L which makes more torque and power. The 6.2L bore of 4.065" doesn't have as much room to improve on, but since it came with way better heads it made more that way.
You don't want huge power, but you want useful power so I'd recommend an LS3 block and heads with a 4" crank. Then you can get a nice mild cam that will drive like a stock motor and easily make the power you want and a little more while giving you lots of torque making it fun to drive and tow well. More cubes with more arm and a mild cam, sort of the modern version of the big block. Should get better gas mileage though.
I guess this might not line up with the budget you have in mind, otherwise it would be a great way to go.
You don't want huge power, but you want useful power so I'd recommend an LS3 block and heads with a 4" crank. Then you can get a nice mild cam that will drive like a stock motor and easily make the power you want and a little more while giving you lots of torque making it fun to drive and tow well. More cubes with more arm and a mild cam, sort of the modern version of the big block. Should get better gas mileage though.
I guess this might not line up with the budget you have in mind, otherwise it would be a great way to go.
#9
TECH Senior Member
If the above is a bit much for the budget, just get an LS3 and put a mild cam in it. You will have close to, if not actually HAVE, 500 HP easy! How many other engines can claim that? 500HP with JUST a cam???
#11
Talk to a shop that builds and dynos these engines daily. You'll want as much torque as possible under the curve and before 3k rpm to keep the converter locked and keep it from constantly shifting and revving. Displacement is key but the huge heads on the 6.2 probably aren't ideal for low end and is 12 cubes worth the couple thousand more a 6.2 will probably cost? Unless you can find a killer deal on a 6.2 block you could probably build a 408 out of a 6.0 for the same price as a 6.2 take out that you have to go through anyway. Jmo
#12
TECH Senior Member
6.2's are getting more common with them being in a lot of trucks now too. Should ease the price situation a bit....
Last edited by G Atsma; 12-27-2017 at 04:16 PM.