Darton 4.125" vs 4.185" Sleeves
#3
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Same sleeve just bored out. Thing is with the dry sleeve max bore is 4.185 and leaves only .060 for thickness. 4.125 bore is Highly Recommended for forced induction. Wet sleeve is a little thicker being that the bores that hold the sleeves are taken out which leads you to be able to bore the Wet sleeve to 4.200. Still 4.125 is recommended for FI. Cost a little more BTW.
Tried some slick $#it and asked if I could add .015 to the dry sleeve which then I could bore out to 4.200 and still have .060 for sleeve thickness. Darton told me that would hurt the integrity of the block as I've weakened the bores holding the sleeves. I figured I could take .015 out of the aluminum bores holding the sleeve's.
Merry Christ Day to Everyone here on TECH!
Tried some slick $#it and asked if I could add .015 to the dry sleeve which then I could bore out to 4.200 and still have .060 for sleeve thickness. Darton told me that would hurt the integrity of the block as I've weakened the bores holding the sleeves. I figured I could take .015 out of the aluminum bores holding the sleeve's.
Merry Christ Day to Everyone here on TECH!
#4
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Said to myself I need to see it for myself, about not being able to bore the block out .015 to add .015 for a thicker sleeve. Tell me what I can't do they just don't know me. LOL!!!!
http://www.darton-international.com/pdf/LS2_manual.pdf
Yeap it's a no go you've got to bore it out as is .015 to .017 to start. Darn it...LOL!
Can't blame me for trying.
Darton:
The lower sleeve diameter specification is 4.275”. The block is bored .0015” to .0017” larger
than the sleeve lower diameter. Do not attempt to install the sleeves if
you can not hold this tolerance. Call Darton for info on proper tooling
and or machines to ensure a satisfactory job. The upper body diameter
has a slight taper. Measure the diameter directly under the flange. This
diameter specification is 4.325”. Again, the block will be bored .0015”
to .0017” larger than your measured diameter.
The lower sleeve diameter specification is 4.275”. The block is bored .0015” to .0017” larger
than the sleeve lower diameter. Do not attempt to install the sleeves if
you can not hold this tolerance. Call Darton for info on proper tooling
and or machines to ensure a satisfactory job. The upper body diameter
has a slight taper. Measure the diameter directly under the flange. This
diameter specification is 4.325”. Again, the block will be bored .0015”
to .0017” larger than your measured diameter.
Yeap it's a no go you've got to bore it out as is .015 to .017 to start. Darn it...LOL!
Can't blame me for trying.
#5
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the replies and even specs to back it! I'm going big cube + n2o with my build, and don't want to leave any room for a block failure with the hell I intend to give it. 4.125" it is! I suppose it always leaves a little room for a bore-out if I lose a ring and scar it up. Thanks again and Merry Christmas.
#6
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the replies and even specs to back it! I'm going big cube + n2o with my build, and don't want to leave any room for a block failure with the hell I intend to give it. 4.125" it is! I suppose it always leaves a little room for a bore-out if I lose a ring and scar it up. Thanks again and Merry Christmas.
#7
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A.R. Shale Targa good looking for someone other than LS7Bird he's plans on Drugs for the engine. Good block but crappy sleeves. Still another 2k for Darton install.
Sounds like he plans on giving it a big hit of Dope.....LOL!
Ls7Bird:
With the hell I intend to give it.
With the hell I intend to give it.
Trending Topics
#8
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Local guy here in the atl craigslist has a MID sleeved LS6 block for $2200. Says it’s new...looks like RED’s work from the pics.
#9
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks, I'm always watching those classifieds here as the best Fbody and LS stuff on the net sells here. I picked up an Ls7 stroker short with a mostly junk bottom end here some time back for cheap and am just now getting ready to send'er out for sleeves and the machine work. I'm also keeping it grass-roots with my own custom (self) designed dry sump tank with the rest of the system being Ls9. Believe it or not, there'll be 12 quarts of oil in the battery tray/coolant overflow area. The specs are ready, just need to build it and test it for its ability to deaerate at high rpm. I'm excited to share that one with you guys once it's completed. It'll all be documented.
#11
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Said to myself I need to see it for myself, about not being able to bore the block out .015 to add .015 for a thicker sleeve. Tell me what I can't do they just don't know me. LOL!!!!
http://www.darton-international.com/pdf/LS2_manual.pdf
Yeap it's a no go you've got to bore it out as is .015 to .017 to start. Darn it...LOL!
Can't blame me for trying.
http://www.darton-international.com/pdf/LS2_manual.pdf
Yeap it's a no go you've got to bore it out as is .015 to .017 to start. Darn it...LOL!
Can't blame me for trying.
#12
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On xbox ....Yet you maybe or better said correct.. Haven't looked yet here is the thing I know if I were to do that it would cost extra to have a custom sleeve made. In turn as much as the wet sleeve $3k +more like 3200-3500. Didn't post this but it's not in the budget... I'm in $200 on dry sleeves as is. I can or have to live with a 4.185 bore .... really have to face facts about cost$.
Last edited by Patron; 12-27-2017 at 01:55 AM.
#13
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There are two sleeve sizes, one a small bore starting out at 3.875" and the standard sleeve which is made for 4.125" and larger bores. Both have the same outside diameter of 4.325" in the upper part of the sleeve. @4.185" bore the wall thickness is .070" not .060". Max. bore is for NA. I recommend staying at 4.155" for boost or nitrous for head gasket retention.
With a 4.400" bore spread .075" of aluminum is left between the sleeves. Making the sleeve OD larger reduces this thickness which will most likely lead to the block cracking between the bores. That's happened on some aftermarket blocks.
The MID sleeves are wet liners and are much thicker than the dry liners since they are self supporting and are in direct contact with the coolant.
The dry liner is more than sufficient for most applications. MID is best for pure racing applications or to save a block that would otherwise be scrapped.
With a 4.400" bore spread .075" of aluminum is left between the sleeves. Making the sleeve OD larger reduces this thickness which will most likely lead to the block cracking between the bores. That's happened on some aftermarket blocks.
The MID sleeves are wet liners and are much thicker than the dry liners since they are self supporting and are in direct contact with the coolant.
The dry liner is more than sufficient for most applications. MID is best for pure racing applications or to save a block that would otherwise be scrapped.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
#14
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Steve thanks for the input, I've got another question I've seen where guy's take a Dart SBC 4.400 bore space block and make it to a 4.5 could this be done with any lsx block: Dart or ....ETC I'd figure it needs to be iron. I'm trying to keep up if I'm gonna spend.
#15
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You would need a billet block as far as I know. I don't know of anyone making a cast LS block with 4.5" bore spacing. That may happen in the future. The cost would be up there since you would need heads, crank and intake to put the thing together.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
#16
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks again Steve! Reason I said this was I follow REAL builds and I've seen and read where Chris U. took a Dart block that any 1 can buy and offset the bore and make a 4.50 bore space engine out of a 4.40 SBC. Gotta think outside the sandlot and not just be a follower. I would like for the ls1 community to out think the AVG! they can do it, why can't we. Same as me asking the TFS spokesman about the canted valve head in a Ls platform that fits factory stuff. I understand your not a manufacturer, but do know manufacturers .....It seems as though they have the best only for the blank or (Trumps of the World). Same with heads and we know what works. Yet sold BS and they buy it or jump on it! I know you'd have to get a different bore spacing Head. Yet if it could be done we could bore the block to the So called GM 4.250 and we all eat. Dart sells the block for less than $3500 yet if made for the Ls guy's it'll cost us 5k.
Last edited by Patron; 12-30-2017 at 02:56 AM.
#17
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And I understand .......I made my own Ls7 heads vs TSP or Mast heads for a small bore. Just because!Nothing but LOVE Steve! This needs to be @ PRI or SEMA for the AVG guy both! Those who know,Know.
Last edited by Patron; 12-30-2017 at 02:58 AM.
#18
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't want anyone to say he's off his meds or he's Crazy. I no longer self medicate.
Could this offset be replicated in most any block?
Chris Uratchko:
Dart utilizes the std Iron Eagle block to spread the bores to 4.5 bore space and have proven to me that it is more than robust with a maximum bore diameter. We average .280-.300 wall thickness everywhere in the bores, with 4.31 bore.
I was a little panic'd about it last week as the block neared completion but Ben Mens at Dart did a sonic on all the cylinders and we are good to go.
Oh, and one note to anyone of interest. 4.5 SBC can't be policed in a STD SBC aside from pulling the head off. These heads have 4.400 bore space exhaust and intake pattern. In other words, the block is 4.400 block, the intake is 4.400 intake, and the headers are 4.400 headers.
Dart utilizes the std Iron Eagle block to spread the bores to 4.5 bore space and have proven to me that it is more than robust with a maximum bore diameter. We average .280-.300 wall thickness everywhere in the bores, with 4.31 bore.
I was a little panic'd about it last week as the block neared completion but Ben Mens at Dart did a sonic on all the cylinders and we are good to go.
Oh, and one note to anyone of interest. 4.5 SBC can't be policed in a STD SBC aside from pulling the head off. These heads have 4.400 bore space exhaust and intake pattern. In other words, the block is 4.400 block, the intake is 4.400 intake, and the headers are 4.400 headers.
No... Dart has updated their Iron Eagle SBC blocks to do this. I don't know how many years back they did the updates maybe Ben can answer that. It would have to be with a virgin block though.
Most folks don't understand that a std SBC, the distance between the front and rear journals are longer than a 4.500 bore space would measure.
So the only change in the bottom end, is number 2 and 4 move apart .100".... The center, front, and rear are stock
So the only change in the bottom end, is number 2 and 4 move apart .100".... The center, front, and rear are stock
#19
TECH Senior Member