Cathedral vs Ls3 test




with significant volume disparities & "mysterious cam Specs , the second
(as mentioned by Tusky) with severely compromised cam Specs for the Cathedral
heads (AFR 230s).
i would suggest as mentioned, starting with Heads from the same manufacturer
(AFR 245 VS 260), (TFS 245 VS 255), (Mast 245 VS 255, or LS1 295 VS LS3 295) or (TSP 245 VS 255) on a
(4.155 X 4.00) 434" 11:0-12.5:1 Comp, Either Holley Hi-Ram or Edelbrock Pro-Flow Intakes
(Runner Lengths & Plenum Volumes need to be equal. LLSR for 7500 RPM,
add 4-6* Intake Duration for the Cathedrals, and add 4-6* Exhaust Duration for
the LS3 Heads something like 250/256-258 Cathedrals VS 246/256-260.
LSA,.... My Bad, Valve Events, specced by Darth or SpeedTigger.
***Mast 295s same specs!***
Compare 3500-7500 as well as 4500-6500 & 5500-7500.
That would be a valid test IMO.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I knew that question was coming. LMAO
My 2 is that I dont really care about what torque or power happens at 3000rpms. 7000 is where the LS3 fun is at. Ive spun it to 7100 and gets there easily and wants more but i don't feel it pulling much so i upshift.
What Hammer said about the intake manifold restricting the LS3 is spot on. He told me that before i got the heads and cam on my LS3 earlier this year ("you'll be disappointed with those heads with the stock manifold"). So ill be posting a stock LS3 manifold in the classifieds soon as soon as i choose/buy the right one.
With that said, its no surprise the BR3 heads won. If you complete the setup (102MM TB and good intake manifold), it becomes even clearer that the rectangular ports are the better heads especially if you have the cubic inch.





