Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Projekt Lazarus - Numbers Posted!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 04:39 AM
  #261  
Launch's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 999
Likes: 133
Default

Awesome man your car is going to run 9's n/a. If only you'd chop your cowl and run an LSXHR intake after the MSD to make a comparison. Sorry for trying to use you as a guinea pig before I buy parts myself LOL . But the LSXHR is so tempting, but then i'd have to be mr pro stock hood. We can't win with intakes can we. Or maybe the mamofied MSD is going to surprise us all.

Just looking at it makes me want it.. https://www.lsxceleration.com/fast-l...nifold-146204/
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 05:49 AM
  #262  
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 361
From: Albany La
Default

Originally Posted by Launch
Awesome man your car is going to run 9's n/a. If only you'd chop your cowl and run an LSXHR intake after the MSD to make a comparison. Sorry for trying to use you as a guinea pig before I buy parts myself LOL . But the LSXHR is so tempting, but then i'd have to be mr pro stock hood. We can't win with intakes can we. Or maybe the mamofied MSD is going to surprise us all.

Just looking at it makes me want it.. https://www.lsxceleration.com/fast-l...nifold-146204/
. There was a comparison on a 468 where the mamofied msd had almost identical power curves as the LsxHr
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 06:48 AM
  #263  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Projekt Lazarus - Numbers Posted!!-photo274.jpg

Mamo msd vs out the box lsxhr. Iirc both intakes were developed by the same group of people.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 06:54 AM
  #264  
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 361
From: Albany La
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Attachment 708665

Mamo msd vs out the box lsxhr. Iirc both intakes were developed by the same group of people.
now a mamo ported LSX hr 🤔
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:04 AM
  #265  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by AINT SKEERED
now a mamo ported LSX hr 🤔
Lol. I knew that was coming. #GoFundMe. Lol
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:05 AM
  #266  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

^^^^^^°° more area...... Or plenum. Wink, wink.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:09 AM
  #267  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey B
^^^^^^°° more area...... Or plenum. Wink, wink.
What you think of someone were to ACCIDENTALLY cut the neck off a msd and epoxy a 125 throttle on?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:13 AM
  #268  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

I figure .....770 to 780' s with a 100 hp loss.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:24 AM
  #269  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

Brother the runner entry...runners and plenum needs more area. The manifold is the best thing out as of now. Low profile.. ....key word now. Think of a intake as if it were a human or athlete and the lungs would be the heads.... Mouth =TB...Neck runners. Mouth = plenum. Sorry for the use of the human anatomy. Damn Hawkeye and MASH. Reason I went & studied surgical procedures.

​​​​​​
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:26 AM
  #270  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

I am not so sure it will dyno that high.

Talked to enough people. Trap 134.x. DA 5k. My guess was 620 rwhp. Five other experienced builders all said 620. Wallace racing (I know I know) says 640. Dyno 577. I will be thrilled to get 650. Highest NA LS7 ever on this dyno is, and I quote -- I think we had one go over 600...

Just trying to maintain realistic expectations.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:27 AM
  #271  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey B
Brother the runner entry...runners and plenum needs more area. The manifold is the best thing out as of now. Low profile.. ....key word now. Think of a intake as if it were a human or athlete and the lungs would be the heads.... Mouth =TB...Neck runners. Mouth = plenum. Sorry for the use of the human anatomy. Damn Hawkeye and MASH. Reason I went & studied surgical procedures.

​​​​​​
100% agree.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:28 AM
  #272  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

Brother been wanting to ask you this.....How big is the runner entry and exit, throw in length. Give me this and I can tell you everything about that intake .....with 2 text sent.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:28 AM
  #273  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey B
Brother been wanting to ask you this.....How big is the runner entry and exit, throw in length. Give me this and I can tell you everything about that intake .....with 2 text sent.
I will have to measure. I can google length.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:37 AM
  #274  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

Darin and ER gave me the same report with the low ram and x2 4500 top. Gave both this and got my report card back....

Runner Length – 3.45”
As-Cast Runner CSA - Tapered, 4.24 in² at the entry to 2.52 in² at the port flange. Needs to be opened or ported....my Ls7 heads are @ min 2.8 inches....

I need about 2 ¹/² inches to be where they'd like rpm and shift wise... both said, it has the area to make some steam.



Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:40 AM
  #275  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Runner length on msd closer to 8-inch
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 07:41 AM
  #276  
spanks13's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 614
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey B
Darin and ER gave me the same report with the low ram and x2 4500 top. Gave both this and got my report card back....

Runner Length – 3.45”
As-Cast Runner CSA - Tapered, 4.24 in² at the entry to 2.52 in² at the port flange. Needs to be opened or ported....my Ls7 heads are @ min 2.8 inches....

I need about 2 ¹/² inches to be where they'd like rpm and shift wise... both said, it has the area to make some steam.
Why not just use the hi ram then?

What about the FED low pro billet intake that was on that 800whp (STD) ls7 from a few weeks ago?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 08:27 AM
  #277  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

#1 not rich... I asked ER y he used the Holley Vs the CID..I mis-Qouted the Truthful answer on YB. I said 15 hrs it's more like a work wk to get the CID nice. I was with going with ER recommendation. Then I saw it .... What I've been wanting.... A ram that's not 2 feet from the valley. If you want it sometimes you gotta roll up you sleeves and make it. Or put on your thinking cap in my case....Found the Cathedral adapter 1/2 inch thick and aluminum 4¹/² tubing ID* to extend the runners about 2 1/4 inches. Dual 4500 low profile with a 7800 to 7900 peak RPM.

Out the box as is, it's shifting at 9k with the runner length.

Little short as runner has 2 injectors per runner.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 09:32 AM
  #278  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

You guys need to be asking what's Chevelle's cooking up? If he get this, the World will thank him....
I'll copy and paste the message from ER&Darin when I get a break... on the intake...it's on YB in the thread I started.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 10:50 AM
  #279  
Smokey B's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 100
Default

From ER:
Runner length is good for about 9500 or so depending on the runner length in the heads.
Cross section is good for around 7000 depending on the valve size.
Darin:
With that cam, that manifold will match up well but peak power will more than likely be at 8000-8300rpm with that length and taper.
Actually, the more I think about it,,, it's going to hit at 8500 so your shift point will be 9000rpm.


Scott .. posted on YB
That's a lot of taper for a very short port. Would be interesting. The port flange is about right for 7500. Min in the port needs to be ~2.49 for that rpm, 4.03 x 4.0 x 7500. Being EFI, not sure how my numbers compare on taper and entry


I posted this for Scott Foxwell 2 compare to the low ram° Hi Rams runners are good for 7500.. Scott ports heads and intakes also. Ported a set of 12 degree Ls3 heads and asked my op and to compare to what info I had...


​​​ Scott here's the ls7 hi ram runner info...all info is on the site.
Runner Length – 6.29”, As-Cast Runner Cross-Sectional Area – Tapered 4.67 in² to 2.84 in².

No intake specialist but adding 2 to 2 1/2 inches would put me in the ball park. My heads are 2.8 in the port entry as standard issue for Ls7 heads. Open the intake exit and adapter to match. Add length to runners. Done Cheap Low Ram with X2 4500's .
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 11:26 AM
  #280  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey B
From ER:
Runner length is good for about 9500 or so depending on the runner length in the heads.
Cross section is good for around 7000 depending on the valve size.
Darin:
With that cam, that manifold will match up well but peak power will more than likely be at 8000-8300rpm with that length and taper.
Actually, the more I think about it,,, it's going to hit at 8500 so your shift point will be 9000rpm.


Scott .. posted on YB
That's a lot of taper for a very short port. Would be interesting. The port flange is about right for 7500. Min in the port needs to be ~2.49 for that rpm, 4.03 x 4.0 x 7500. Being EFI, not sure how my numbers compare on taper and entry


I posted this for Scott Foxwell 2 compare to the low ram° Hi Rams runners are good for 7500.. Scott ports heads and intakes also. Ported a set of 12 degree Ls3 heads and asked my op and to compare to what info I had...


​​​ Scott here's the ls7 hi ram runner info...all info is on the site.
Runner Length – 6.29”, As-Cast Runner Cross-Sectional Area – Tapered 4.67 in² to 2.84 in².

No intake specialist but adding 2 to 2 1/2 inches would put me in the ball park. My heads are 2.8 in the port entry as standard issue for Ls7 heads. Open the intake exit and adapter to match. Add length to runners. Done Cheap Low Ram with X2 4500's .
I'm not following what this in regards to. Your build or mine??
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.