Warhawk Block?
03-17-2006, 08:21 PM
#101
Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
What About Compatibility Of The Heads With A Sleeved Ls1 Block? And Would A Ls1 Based Intake Work? If Yes You Will Have My Business!!!!!
03-18-2006, 09:20 AM
#102
Originally Posted by Ferocity02
I believe that the LS7x heads will fit on LS1/6 blocks, sleeved ofcourse, which is what I plan on doing. An LS1 intake will not work with these heads, however, an LS7 intake is designed to bolt right up to these heads.
03-18-2006, 07:55 PM
#104
Thanks Warhawk, I did some research and I found where to get the intake, but I just read a thread about t.b. issues now. I am still a good 9 months or so away from getting this baby finished, so I am sure everything will be ready to go by then. From everything I have read, you will definitely have my business.
03-23-2006, 08:46 PM
#106
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chuntington101
anyone offering creat engines using these blocks yet?? if not anyone going to see how long they are going to be! 
Chris.
Chris.
I'll have them. As a matter of fact, I'm using the Warhawk in "all" of my engine packages. Cost will vary but it will start around 20K and go up from there... <(Depending on options)
I'm not really selling to the asphalt guys, "yet" strictly dune folks... But I will share any engine scooby with you guys once these things start hitting the dyno... If anyone is interested....
PS: Mods you can delete my post if it goes against the advertisement rules... But I don't "think" it does... I didn't give out any company info.
03-29-2006, 02:20 PM
#108
FormerVendor
Originally Posted by Big-DEN
Eric,
Can these "extended deck" arrangements achieve strokes of greater than the 4.5" which is already tremendous?
What is max stroke that can be attained on stock 9.240" deck, 9.840" deck, 10.2" deck?
All of us would be interested in this factet.
Thank you,
Dennis
Can these "extended deck" arrangements achieve strokes of greater than the 4.5" which is already tremendous?
What is max stroke that can be attained on stock 9.240" deck, 9.840" deck, 10.2" deck?
All of us would be interested in this factet.
Thank you,
Dennis
03-31-2006, 02:58 PM
#109
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big-DEN
Eric,
Can these "extended deck" arrangements achieve strokes of greater than the 4.5" which is already tremendous?
What is max stroke that can be attained on stock 9.240" deck, 9.840" deck, 10.2" deck?
All of us would be interested in this factet.
Thank you,
Dennis
Can these "extended deck" arrangements achieve strokes of greater than the 4.5" which is already tremendous?
What is max stroke that can be attained on stock 9.240" deck, 9.840" deck, 10.2" deck?
All of us would be interested in this factet.
Thank you,
Dennis
Is there a 10.2' deck version of the Warhawl LS7X block? I've had a 9.800" on order, but a 10.200" would be cool!
03-31-2006, 04:09 PM
#111
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winchester,VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could someone be kind enough to fill me in as to what is so special / different about this block? I mean basics b/c i don't really know much about this field...
For example is the block material stronger than iron? Will it be able to accept a longer stroke/bore than any other block would be able to thus far?
For example is the block material stronger than iron? Will it be able to accept a longer stroke/bore than any other block would be able to thus far?
03-31-2006, 05:58 PM
#112
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about using this block/heads in different platforms, such as a gen 1 set up?
I read an article on the net that said the block had mounts for a gen 1 or LS style mount.
What about the bellhousing?
vertigo, read here.
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com/tech/0603htp_hawk/
I read an article on the net that said the block had mounts for a gen 1 or LS style mount.
What about the bellhousing?
vertigo, read here.
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com/tech/0603htp_hawk/
03-31-2006, 06:03 PM
#113
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vertigo
Could someone be kind enough to fill me in as to what is so special / different about this block? I mean basics b/c i don't really know much about this field...
For example is the block material stronger than iron? Will it be able to accept a longer stroke/bore than any other block would be able to thus far?
For example is the block material stronger than iron? Will it be able to accept a longer stroke/bore than any other block would be able to thus far?
Another great selling point is the fact that the cylinder walls aren't bored paper thin in between, and they also have provisions for two extra head bolts per cylinder (when used with Warhawk heads).
There's almost too much to list, if you really want a quality learning experience, complete with illustrations, check out the write up in Chevy Rumble this month.
This engine is still aluminum, but beefed up in all the right places.
04-01-2006, 10:07 AM
#114
FormerVendor
Originally Posted by Big-DEN
Eric,
Can these "extended deck" arrangements achieve strokes of greater than the 4.5" which is already tremendous?
What is max stroke that can be attained on stock 9.240" deck, 9.840" deck, 10.2" deck?
All of us would be interested in this factet.
Thank you,
Dennis
Can these "extended deck" arrangements achieve strokes of greater than the 4.5" which is already tremendous?
What is max stroke that can be attained on stock 9.240" deck, 9.840" deck, 10.2" deck?
All of us would be interested in this factet.
Thank you,
Dennis
04-02-2006, 09:58 AM
#118
Collections Removal
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OmniRex'
Warhawks are fully dry sump capable. Remember they are priority-main systems and depending on your usage, you might not need to spend for dry sump.
Warhawks are fully dry sump capable. Remember they are priority-main systems and depending on your usage, you might not need to spend for dry sump.
04-03-2006, 09:04 AM
#119
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winchester,VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bill mcdonald
What about using this block/heads in different platforms, such as a gen 1 set up?
I read an article on the net that said the block had mounts for a gen 1 or LS style mount.
What about the bellhousing?
vertigo, read here.
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com/tech/0603htp_hawk/
I read an article on the net that said the block had mounts for a gen 1 or LS style mount.
What about the bellhousing?
vertigo, read here.
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com/tech/0603htp_hawk/
Thankyou! This is almost scary!! At that price why would anybody go with something other than this block? From the sounds of it this almost sounds like an extremely reliable setup that will provide monster power! With those cubes do you think 550-600 rear would be easy with boltons and a med cam N/A?
