Katech Torquer LS7 cam 557rwhp on a dynojet
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This just prooves my argument about chassis dynos even further and I thought I would share with you guys. Once of our dealers recently installed our Torquer LS7 cam in a 2006 Z06. They loved the idle quality and said it put down 557rwhp on the dynojet. We had previously measured 508rwhp on a mustang.
Here is a link to my first post about the cam:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/543833-katech-torquer-ls7-cam-now-available.html
Here is a link to my first post about the cam:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/543833-katech-torquer-ls7-cam-now-available.html
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Quik
does thsi cam like hte L92 heads
-Geoff
#7
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by White_Hawk
That is exactly what I was thinking (but without so many typos). Was the lift rated with the 1.8 rockers? I wonder how it would do on a 402, with L92 heads, and an L76 intake. Probably have some valve clearance issues.
-Geoff
-Geoff
Yes, 1.8 RAR.
Trending Topics
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Katech
Show me the money.
I would consider the cam..... sounds good for a 408....... I am looking to go away from high rpms and looking for gobs of low end torque....... the higher the car spins for power the harder on the clutch IMO. I already have an engine builder....... just need a cam for it.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)