Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Katech Torquer LS7 cam 557rwhp on a dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2006, 02:52 PM
  #1  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
Katech_Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default Katech Torquer LS7 cam 557rwhp on a dynojet

This just prooves my argument about chassis dynos even further and I thought I would share with you guys. Once of our dealers recently installed our Torquer LS7 cam in a 2006 Z06. They loved the idle quality and said it put down 557rwhp on the dynojet. We had previously measured 508rwhp on a mustang.

Here is a link to my first post about the cam:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/543833-katech-torquer-ls7-cam-now-available.html
Old 11-27-2006, 02:56 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does thsi cam like hte L92 heads
Old 11-27-2006, 04:00 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quik
does thsi cam like hte L92 heads
That is exactly what I was thinking (but without so many typos). Was the lift rated with the 1.8 rockers? I wonder how it would do on a 402, with L92 heads, and an L76 intake. Probably have some valve clearance issues.

-Geoff
Old 11-27-2006, 04:05 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

man so many ppl will have same setup come 07. but yea im wondering i like the Torquer 2 in my 6.0
Old 11-27-2006, 04:21 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

wow! big difference between jet and stang dyno. was that kirks stang dyno?
Old 11-27-2006, 05:01 PM
  #6  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
Katech_Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quik
does thsi cam like hte L92 heads

Don't know yet. I would think so.
Old 11-27-2006, 05:01 PM
  #7  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
Katech_Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by White_Hawk
That is exactly what I was thinking (but without so many typos). Was the lift rated with the 1.8 rockers? I wonder how it would do on a 402, with L92 heads, and an L76 intake. Probably have some valve clearance issues.

-Geoff

Yes, 1.8 RAR.
Old 11-27-2006, 05:01 PM
  #8  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
Katech_Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike c.
wow! big difference between jet and stang dyno. was that kirks stang dyno?

Yes.


_
Old 11-28-2006, 03:02 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

508hp on kirks dyno is killer.
Old 11-28-2006, 07:56 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Katech
Don't know yet. I would think so.
well... damnit.... hurry up and put that stick on a L92 headed car.
Old 11-28-2006, 09:45 PM
  #11  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
Katech_Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forteen3GT
well... damnit.... hurry up and put that stick on a L92 headed car.

Show me the money.
Old 11-28-2006, 10:58 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Katech
Show me the money.

I would consider the cam..... sounds good for a 408....... I am looking to go away from high rpms and looking for gobs of low end torque....... the higher the car spins for power the harder on the clutch IMO. I already have an engine builder....... just need a cam for it.



Quick Reply: Katech Torquer LS7 cam 557rwhp on a dynojet



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.