Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

What's with the TQ dropoff at low RPM's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2006, 04:56 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default What's with the TQ dropoff at low RPM's?

I've been doing a lot of head research. I noticed in one of the latest issues of GMHTP that it seems all the LS2 Dyno graphs had a TQ dropoff at low RPM's.

What causes this?

I got these graphs here... http://www.gmhightechperformance.com.../photo_25.html




Last edited by bayer-z28; 12-26-2006 at 07:50 PM.
Old 12-26-2006, 10:45 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
67 Rally Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am a little curious about this myself. My guess is that it has something to do with the tune, but it's only a guess.

Greg
Old 12-27-2006, 04:49 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think it's how the dyno loads the motor.....
Old 12-27-2006, 05:20 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66deuce
i think it's how the dyno loads the motor.....
This is probably not the reason. The engine is loaded fully slightly below the lowest recorded rpm (2700 in this case).

The 3000-4000 "hole" may be caused by the intake and perhaps exhaust tuning lengths as well as valve timing. You could "fill" in this hole to get more average torque/power but you might sacrifice a little peak hp. I guess it would depend on what your goals were. My guess is that most magazine tests look for the biggest peak numbers.

Note that the 30 lb-ft max "hole" was different for the different heads, but was still about the same rpm. Same intake, exhaust and cam if I recall the test.

In the 2006 Engine Masters Challenge, which is scored by (average torque + average hp) from 2500-6500, the winner was as much as 37 peak hp and only a few peak lb-ft down on the runner-up, but the averages were better. The runner-up had a big "hole" in the lower rpm torque curve.

If you replot the torque curve with the y-axis (torque) compressed to what you normally see on a Dynojet graph, you might not see so much of the "hole". Horsepower is calculated from torque and rpm, so the hp curve also dips, but less radically because the rpm is below 5252 where torque and hp numbers are the same. Note that little torque blips have a bigger effect on hp above 6000. Both engines had about 83-85% of peak torque from 2700 to 7000, which would make a killer street driver!

FWIW, this is the same reply to the same thread on another forum, which shall remain nameless.


My $.02
Old 01-03-2007, 12:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ah... GOtcha... I figured I'd see if responses would vary, this board is a little more active then the other one.
Old 01-03-2007, 01:03 PM
  #6  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

That dropoff is very common with drive-by-wire LS1s and LS2s. There is a tuning fix. There's an entire thread about this in the dyno section from a month or two ago. Slowhawk knows how to fix the dip.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 01-03-2007, 01:25 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

learn something every day.....
Old 01-03-2007, 01:27 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
509TURBOFIREHAWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alot of times when ive seen this is with very powerfull racing heads, SB2.2's, splayed valve heads and so on, I would just about consider all LSX heads as production racing heads. I dont know why it happens. If you look at some of old school 23* stuff you dont see it as much. And alot of times you wont see it on an all out racing head as they dont test at that low of an rpm. just my .02 cents
Old 01-04-2007, 09:03 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

We never did get a final answer on this:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/576635-most-c5-dyno-graphs-have.html




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.