Calling all l92 cam GURUS ?????
Car runs good now after a nightmare of tuning problems and ran 10.40's with carb setup and ran 10.70's today with the injection after an all nighter to switch over last night. I read alot that the big cams dont work ? what about a setup like m ine does anyone this i have power to be gain or better ET's going to a smaller cam or a different cam I have changed cams a couple times but all have been pretty large 24x/25x stuff all over .600 lift went 9.36 with old cam and 300 shot. If anyone has a setup like this please let me know what you are running for a cam ? I would like to see what the cam gurus like Rick at synergy and Patrick G think as I always see them suggesting L92 cams for DD cars, but this is a different story I am not looking to go 12's My ultimate goal is high 9's NA if at all possible and maybe a cam would help get me closer ? OH yeah I forgot it has 2 stage nitrous I have not used yet 250hp fogger and another 125hp wet nozzle.
My car is 80%race and 20% street driving 3200lbs
408 callies crank rods and wiseco pistons (compression is 10.85)
Has carb intake and eldebrock big 105cc elbow
90mm TB and 85mm MAF
TH350 trans brake new 4000RPM coan stall
4.22 9" and 28x13.5 et street's
Put down 468RWHP with only 24 degrees timing

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
I feel the cam situation is just a crutch for a poor intake situation that has an easy fix. Reduce volume and loose the elbows this will create airspeed and build runner pressure between cycles. for example almost all the top performing 9 second NA cars have a carb or some sort of 4150 throttle body look at Collin's car it has a big cam and works even with his relatively low stall and footbrake launchs.
I switched to the Accufab 4150 TB and went back from a 234@.050 cam to a large 24X/26x cam and made the same torque numbers and 22 more hp.
I even cc'd one of those old 2x4 tunnel ram intakes with a dart 215cc head and the combined volume of that was still less thatn mu L92 setup with elbow ? hard to believe but true and you know as well as I do this kills airspeed and will mess with tunes and power numbers. look at the lS7 heads they have less cross section for a reason.
Maybe im crazy but I think people are a followers and when someone knowledgable says its a cam problem you need a special cam everyone follows instead of doing research to be sure its just a cam problem. no offence to you but people could get the same results with porting the exhaust and a different throttle body setup ?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Also another thing to consider is the intake port is the same cross section as an old big block at 3.19 square inches and we now how they can run ? But they have a balanced intake to exhaust port flow and they dont require any special cams just to prove a point.
Also another thing to consider is the intake port is the same cross section as an old big block at 3.19 square inches and we now how they can run ? But they have a balanced intake to exhaust port flow and they dont require any special cams just to prove a point.
This is what I was faced with when I built my forged LS3. I got excellent power with the SP/4150 accufab combo with a 220/244 110+, 590/498 @7200 on the e~dyno. For me, the combo works cause the car isnt a DD. IMO
LPE CNCed L92 heads with stock sized light weight intake valves
L92 truck intake with mild porting (smoothing the internals ridges)
LME 441 LS7 Shortblock
4L70E tranny with 3400 stall
4.56 gears and 20" wheels - both of these will drain on a chasis dyno
the cam was speced as a LPE experimental my builder got, the specs are what i understand which are vague but will translate to the discussion...
the duration split is right at 10 and the lift split is like 15 and i have no idea what lobe was used.....
as i understand the specs: 240/250 @ .050 .655/.670 114 LSA 110 ICL which we installed 4 degrees advanced....
this is a pick of the dyno done on HPP's dyno in lewisville, tx....
this is motor with TR6's and 25 deg. of timing on pump gas and 21 deg. of timing on pump gas with a 100 shot on Nitrous Outlet Plate
Last edited by TBSS-RAGE; Aug 19, 2008 at 06:09 PM.
LPE CNCed L92 heads with stock sized light weight valves
L92 truck intake with mild porting (smoothing the internals ridges)
LME 441 LS7 Shortbloack
4L70E tranny with 3400 stall
4.56 gears and 20" wheels - both of these will drain on a chasis dyno
the cam was speced as a LPE experimental my builder got, the specs are what i understand which are vague but will translate to the discussion...
the duration split is right at 10 and the lift split is like 15 and i have no idea what lobe was used.....
as i understand the specs: 240/250 @ .050 .655/.670 114 LSA 110 ICL which we installed 4 degrees advanced....
this is a pick of the dyno done on HPP's dyno in lewisville, tx....
this is motor with TR6's and 25 deg. of timing on pump gas and 21 deg. of timing on pump gas with a 100 shot on Nitrous Outlet Plate
Exactly thats some very stout numbers considering your power losing drivetrain and exactly what I have been using is cams like that because they work.
This is what I was faced with when I built my forged LS3. I got excellent power with the SP/4150 accufab combo with a 220/244 110+, 590/498 @7200 on the e~dyno. For me, the combo works cause the car isnt a DD. IMO
I ported intake and exhaust ports on my L92's and the exhaust did not pick up tremendously in flow, pipe diameter has more to do with peak power rpm, it doesnt limit power as much as many believe. I see some speak of turning 7500 rpm hydraulic roller, i have done alot to get past 6900 and it is not working past 6900. I also found that L-92 heads are so adequate in flow on my 402" that the carb pulled low cfm #'s thru the air flow meter for the amount of power the engine was making. Only around 700 cfm at 6900 rpm.
Port speed is determined by HP and port cross section regardless of displacemnt. Ever notice that everybody's big L92 head engines seem to make about the same max HP?
The engine seems to be sensitive to exhaust valve timing with regards to carrying the HP curve i.e.- the valve needs to open at a certain time in order to a certain HP, but port flow seems to have virtually no effect on HP.
The intake, with it's big cross section has relatively low port speed (in the runner) so hanging the valve open too long WILL cause intake reversion. Close the valve a little earlier to trap the cylinder and let the large port carry the HP.
The problem with the intake is that when you start making, say.....630 fwhp, the port speed at the bowl is so high the air stream will not stay attatched to the floor as it turns toward the valve. This causes the air stream to tumble and spill entirely out the far side of the valve seat area instead of some air going out the far side and some going out the near side. The valve is a crucial component of directing the air through the seat area and when you open it too far, it's no longer in a good position to guide the air stream through at higher speeds so the stream goes turbulent and VIOLA!..... no more air flow.... no more HP!
I ported intake and exhaust ports on my L92's and the exhaust did not pick up tremendously in flow, pipe diameter has more to do with peak power rpm, it doesnt limit power as much as many believe. I see some speak of turning 7500 rpm hydraulic roller, i have done alot to get past 6900 and it is not working past 6900. I also found that L-92 heads are so adequate in flow on my 402" that the carb pulled low cfm #'s thru the air flow meter for the amount of power the engine was making. Only around 700 cfm at 6900 rpm.
Port speed is determined by HP and port cross section regardless of displacemnt. Ever notice that everybody's big L92 head engines seem to make about the same max HP?
The engine seems to be sensitive to exhaust valve timing with regards to carrying the HP curve i.e.- the valve needs to open at a certain time in order to a certain HP, but port flow seems to have virtually no effect on HP.
The intake, with it's big cross section has relatively low port speed (in the runner) so hanging the valve open too long WILL cause intake reversion. Close the valve a little earlier to trap the cylinder and let the large port carry the HP.
The problem with the intake is that when you start making, say.....630 fwhp, the port speed at the bowl is so high the air stream will not stay attatched to the floor as it turns toward the valve. This causes the air stream to tumble and spill entirely out the far side of the valve seat area instead of some air going out the far side and some going out the near side. The valve is a crucial component of directing the air through the seat area and when you open it too far, it's no longer in a good position to guide the air stream through at higher speeds so the stream goes turbulent and VIOLA!..... no more air flow.... no more HP!
If you say HP dictates air speed 100% the air speed would always be a constant all engines would make peak hp with stock L92 at the same rpm reguardless of size ? Right
No thats wrong thats why your 454 will make more power at any given rpm than a 408 will with the same head. The larger cubic inch moves more air at a lower rpm correct ? yes, so that means the cubic inch is increasing the air speed making more power, hp is not increasing air speed cubic inch is. The only spot they can be equal is at the peak hp reading wich will be at different rpm's. because why ? cubic inch difference, right.



