LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

I filled up with 87 and was really surprised

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:17 AM
  #1  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default I filled up with 87 and was really surprised

I was out of gas and the only gas station around me was very expensive so i decided to fill it with 87. It was shell gas which is not known to be good gas to begin with. Well to my surprise my car is running much BETTER now. It pulls a lot harder and i am not getting knock. My car was tuned twice for 93 octane and i have never put anything but that in it. Can anyone explain why its working so well?
Old 07-09-2009 | 09:24 AM
  #2  
JP_GXP's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: Almost Arkansas, LA
Default

I've always been told to use Shell... I had to put 89 in a few months ago, because 93 was sold out, and I could tell that it was a little sluggish and idled a little wrong.

Where do you typically fuel up?
Old 07-09-2009 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

i usually use sonoco or bp because i did a dyno test twice and both times when i used shell gas i got knock. When i used other gases i didnt get knock.
Old 07-09-2009 | 11:04 AM
  #4  
DP 08 GXP's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: Northwest, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Sittingmongoose
i usually use sonoco or bp because i did a dyno test twice and both times when i used shell gas i got knock. When i used other gases i didnt get knock.

i used to use strictly shell until i has knock on my dyno run. i try to get BP everytime now even though my town only has shell.
Old 07-09-2009 | 12:17 PM
  #5  
Pauls325's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 1
From: Minnetonka,MN or Fargo
Default

the only reason it could be running better is because higher octane ratings take more energy to ignite and the burn speed could be different could be in your head though not sure
Old 07-09-2009 | 12:45 PM
  #6  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

i am thinking it has to be in my head, but today i raced a stock gxp and it looked like it was standing still yet i have recently raced a monte ss that was stock and that kept up well.....idk maybe i got a really good batch of gas?? cause the car isnt pinging either
Old 07-09-2009 | 02:10 PM
  #7  
06 SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: LITH, IL.
Default

Originally Posted by Pauls325
the only reason it could be running better is because higher octane ratings take more energy to ignite and the burn speed could be different could be in your head though not sure
No. all Octane does is raise the temp required to fire it initially. It allows more timing/compression before cylinder temps can ignite it on their own (ala Diesel). The spark is hot enough to fire any Octane gas available and once the reaction starts, it is exothermic (obviously) and the flame front will progress at the same speed. It takes heat to ignite, one might make the argument that it takes more energy to fire initially, but you could have an atomic bomb fire off in it if the temps stayed low enough and it would not fire. Conversely, you could have the tiniest amount of spark energy imaginable (within reason) and it would ignite the mixture.
Old 07-09-2009 | 03:04 PM
  #8  
Pauls325's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 1
From: Minnetonka,MN or Fargo
Default

just telling you what i have read it takes more initial spark energy to run higher octane which is why it can be detrimental to use high octane gas in cars that work perfectly fine on regular. just maybe his car because of heatsoak or some other reason has the retard set so that it runs fine on 87 and because it takes less spark energy to ignite the coil saturation stays better....
Old 07-09-2009 | 03:18 PM
  #9  
06MonteSS's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 11
From: CT
Default

same here... read that higher octane burns slower than lower octane...

so maybe that's the difference he's feeling with using the lower octane gas, cuz it's burning/flashing faster???
__________________
06MonteSS / DiabLew Tune

2014 Camaro 2SS/RS - LS3, 6-speed manual, short-throw performance shifter, NPP dual-mode performance exhaust, 1LE front splitter, ZL1 rockers, Z28 Rear Spoiler, all paint-matched Red Rock Metallic, BMR strut tower brace, Cold Air Inductions cold air intake, Apex Motorsports, Inc. catch-can, Custom DiabLew Tune
www.diablewtune.com -- www.diablocustomtune.com -- www.diablocustomtunegm.com
Old 07-09-2009 | 05:00 PM
  #10  
20SS07's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: Reading, Pennsylvania
Default

I use whatever gas station nearby. I'm not picky. Typically I go to Mobil or Wawa(for you Northeastern'ers). I originally used 89 for the first 3k miles or so, now have used 92/93 ever since. Buddy of mine has had an 06 Imp SS since brand new and has never used anything other than 87.
Old 07-09-2009 | 05:39 PM
  #11  
Brian396's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa IL
Default

Just because it said it was 87 doesn’t make it 87. When I was N/A and tuned for 93 the wife put 87 in and the car ran like crap.
Old 07-09-2009 | 05:59 PM
  #12  
keviiinn's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Default

I think it's funny you heard that Shell is crap, I've generally heard that Shell is some of the best gas available, along with Chevron.
Old 07-09-2009 | 06:13 PM
  #13  
06 SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: LITH, IL.
Default

Originally Posted by 06MonteSS
same here... read that higher octane burns slower than lower octane...

so maybe that's the difference he's feeling with using the lower octane gas, cuz it's burning/flashing faster???
The only theoretical advantage of lower Octane gas is that Octane boosters are real good at what they do, but crappy as a fuel. Ethenol blends kick *** as an Octane booster, but they have waaaay lower energy content per volume. So....gasoline that has lower Octane (aka less boosting additives) will have more chemical energy potential per weight. I doubt you could measure it, as the boosters are a tiny portion of the mixture, but, in theory, it should give better mileage.
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:30 PM
  #14  
06MonteSS's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 11
From: CT
Default

Shell is **** gas... causes a lot of KR... definitely NOT one of the better gases available...
__________________
06MonteSS / DiabLew Tune

2014 Camaro 2SS/RS - LS3, 6-speed manual, short-throw performance shifter, NPP dual-mode performance exhaust, 1LE front splitter, ZL1 rockers, Z28 Rear Spoiler, all paint-matched Red Rock Metallic, BMR strut tower brace, Cold Air Inductions cold air intake, Apex Motorsports, Inc. catch-can, Custom DiabLew Tune
www.diablewtune.com -- www.diablocustomtune.com -- www.diablocustomtunegm.com
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:38 PM
  #15  
SeweRat's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by keviiinn
I think it's funny you heard that Shell is crap, I've generally heard that Shell is some of the best gas available, along with Chevron.
Shell has always been top rated. I use 93 octane Shell V-Power exclusively.

http://www.toptiergas.com/retailers.html
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:53 PM
  #16  
06MonteSS's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 11
From: CT
Default

yeah, don't believe that top-tier listing... they PAID to be on that list....

log your knock retard on that shell crap...

I, as well as MANY MANY MANY MANY MANY MANY others had a BUNCH of KR... and after switching off of shell gas, it went away...

I wouldn't run that **** in my lawn mower...
__________________
06MonteSS / DiabLew Tune

2014 Camaro 2SS/RS - LS3, 6-speed manual, short-throw performance shifter, NPP dual-mode performance exhaust, 1LE front splitter, ZL1 rockers, Z28 Rear Spoiler, all paint-matched Red Rock Metallic, BMR strut tower brace, Cold Air Inductions cold air intake, Apex Motorsports, Inc. catch-can, Custom DiabLew Tune
www.diablewtune.com -- www.diablocustomtune.com -- www.diablocustomtunegm.com
Old 07-09-2009 | 09:48 PM
  #17  
Count of Monte Carlo's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Hudson River Valley, NY
Default

It'll run fine on regular. If you lug the engine though, you might feel a surging effect.
Old 07-09-2009 | 11:04 PM
  #18  
smug_GXP's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

I have always used shell and never have I had a problem with the gas.
Old 07-10-2009 | 12:10 PM
  #19  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

shell for sure is much worse gas i have dyno results to prove the kr
Old 07-10-2009 | 06:20 PM
  #20  
SeweRat's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Sittingmongoose
shell for sure is much worse gas i have dyno results to prove the kr
Thanks for the info. My other choices are BP or Marathon w/STP.
Whadda ya think?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.