had a run in with an IS-F today
#22
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reading, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson River Valley, NY
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The tie up in shifting so much doesn't help at all. I see no reason for a car to have so many underdrive gears unless that car is pulling 80,000 lbs. Plus I cant see there being any fuel economy benefits at all. Commercial drivers skip shift when unloaded to save fuel and and improve acceleration. Granted its a different kind of driving but a ratio change is just what it is. A cvt makes alot more sense if thats what they wanted to achieve. I'd like to think there is some sort of skip shift logic which if there is, just adds to more confusion....
All gimmicks.
Good thing the lexus didn't keep accelerating and shifting uncontrolably right off an embankment....They seem to like doing that nowadays...
All gimmicks.
Good thing the lexus didn't keep accelerating and shifting uncontrolably right off an embankment....They seem to like doing that nowadays...
Last edited by Count of Monte Carlo; 11-23-2009 at 09:13 PM.