F-body to GXP?
. I want to stay with an LS car, and I've noticed how inexpensive used GXP's are these days and I love the way they look (I'm sure they drive awesome too, I've never got to drive one yet though). What would you guys think would be a fair price to pay for a 9/10 condition GXP with between 40-70k on the clock? Also, how easy are these cars to mod and what is the aftermarket support like for the LS4? I definitely know that after going from my f-body to a GXP I'm going to be itching for more power, so I'm wondering how the aftermarket treats the LS4 and how expensive they are to mod. And most importantly, is there anyone here with a high mileage LS4 than can report on reliability? Cliff notes: Basically, I'm asking for the shakedown of what the GXP is all about. How easy/cost effective is it to mod (what would a stout LS4 put out in terms of power?) what's a fair price for a GXP, and how reliable are they under DD circumstances. Thanks!
Besides that, my sister had one for a few years, they definitely have some get-up-and-go, plus they're comfortable to boot (stock Bilsteins are also a bonus), minus the rear seats if you're tall or have kids that want to look out of the windows, lol.
that sucks. I just read thru the sticky at the top about the trannys. Can't believe that many people are having problems. It doesn't seem like something you can just slap a tranny cooler on either and be ok.. Thanks for the inputTrending Topics
Yes they break , you KNOW its going to happen
So you buy a used car with a good trans?
You can beat the **** out of it and throw more power at it with solid set of bolt-ons.
Or you can pull it into the garage stick a transgo shift kit in it with a good cooler and a tcm module from overkill as soon as you get home , then slowly save up for a full on rebuild with good parts and then worry about performance.
If you KNOW the trans is a weak spot why throw more power at an already insuffecient transmission?
It doesnt make sense
But everyone does it
And everyone bitches about these transmissions.
My second mod was a cooler with a shiftkit
It should have been my first.
I beat the **** out of my car on a daily basis.
And the trans still feels great , But i started making upgrades to that tranny less than 2 months after buying the vehicle , and i am going to continue to upgrade it as i go.
Its an LS motor you can make as much power as you want if your pockets deep enough.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As far as I know, the trans doesn't break... Something like the converter goes out or the the fluid heats up and the clutches get burned up. Trans temps are 180-240 without a cooler, due to our excessive and most awesome stall (2200-2400)
Having this trans is like raising a wild animal or a pitbull. You never know if or when it might snap.
GXP are very nice cars and well built. They are great family cars with bilstein shocks, 18" wheels, big brakes (stock pads suck!) super turning radius and agressive styling. It is not a race car but begs to be driven like one. Mod for mod the T/A is the better option.
Take it for a test drive and try it out for yourself.
I'd recommend (in order)
Trans cooler
Shift kit
Ceramic front brake pads
275/40/18 front tires
Front and rear STB's
3" downpipe with highflow cat
Magnaflow exhaust kit
CAI
Header wrap (for the crossover pipe)
Tune
You could always add a LS1/LS6 intake and cam in the future for gobs of power.
Last edited by DavidGXP; Apr 12, 2011 at 01:36 AM.
Last edited by Brian396; Apr 12, 2011 at 09:09 PM.
As far as I know, the trans doesn't break... Something like the converter goes out or the the fluid heats up and the clutches get burned up. Trans temps are 180-240 without a cooler, due to our excessive and most awesome stall (2200-2400)
Having this trans is like raising a wild animal or a pitbull. You never know if or when it might snap.
That is the odd thing about this whole trans situation. MOST of the failures don't involve something "breaking". Yet, the trans is only rated to handle 280 lb-ft of torque at the crank, and our motors are rated at 323 lb-ft. We SHOULD be experiencing more hard part (input shaft, etc.) failures than we are. Perhaps, the compromises made in the design of our trans protects it from these types of things while causing the problems we DO have.
For the record, my '87 Grand National has 166,000 miles on it. The trans is original and stock, with only a big trans cooler and no shift kit. At least 500 of the above miles was done a quarter at a time
, with dozens of passes in the high-elevens. The car only gets about 8,000 miles per year now, and I change the trans fluid every spring, just to be safe. It still works fine, and I know how to take care of my cars. My point is, any stock trans should be able to get 100k miles without problems. Unfortunately, I've had more trans changes in our Impala than I've had fluid changes. I can't seem to get one to last the 30,000 miles at which I would do a fluid change, and this is on a car that gets 99% highway miles at 65 MPH, as driven by my wife.
The trans IS a problem, and any buyer should be be acutely aware that they have AT LEAST a 1 in 3 (and probably more like 1 in 2) chance of having a problem by 60,000 miles.
Just sucks that that when It does decide to go, it's not cheap or easy to replace.
+3 on the CTS-V
. Plus, I love the T-56 as much as anyone here, but the commuting I do is mostly city miles with stop and go traffic everywhere. I'd be pulling my hair out after 1k mi with that car. I'm not totally opposed to getting a CTS-V, but even the 04's with heavy miles are a little too pricey IMOWhat the ****! was GM thinking putting this tranny in there? From the way it sounds it's the biggest hunk of **** ever assembled.. You would think by around 06 they would've learned how to build a tranny..unbelieveable
Just sucks that that when It does decide to go, it's not cheap or easy to replace.
+3 on the CTS-V
When one of the users on this site, RKO, asked GM that question specifically, they refused to answer. They also would not provide any information on failure rates, due to a pending NHTSA investigation.
The trans in the V6 does have a different valve body and is calibrated differently, but aside from our thicker half-shafts, hardened gear train and case-mounted starter, it's pretty much the same transmission that went into the L67 cars. The thing is, this trans was inadequate for the S/C3800's, too.
. Plus, I love the T-56 as much as anyone here, but the commuting I do is mostly city miles with stop and go traffic everywhere. I'd be pulling my hair out after 1k mi with that car. I'm not totally opposed to getting a CTS-V, but even the 04's with heavy miles are a little too pricey IMOWhat the ****! was GM thinking putting this tranny in there? From the way it sounds it's the biggest hunk of **** ever assembled.. You would think by around 06 they would've learned how to build a tranny..unbelieveable



