VP 112 race octane
I agree with the others, no KR, no need, unless you want to try and bump up the timing and by doing so create a situation where KR rears its ugly head.
By way of contrast, at the track I run VP C16 (116 motor octane) in my '87 GN which has a good sized turbo running a fair amount of boost.
Hope this helps,
Morgan
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I mean no disrespect, but how much experience do you have working with high octane leaded fuels? 112 octane is far too much for a stock compression N/A application; the only reason to step up to such an octane are for the reasons I noted in my post above, or if one was running a siginificant amount of spray on a high compression motor. If I were to put a 100 shot on an LS4 car I'd be inclined to run VP Red (100 octane unleaded) or even VP Motorsport 103 (also unleaded) to give me a little extra insurance at the track. Prior to getting her Charger my spouse used to run a LSX guru/dyno-tuned '04 LS1 GTO out at CA Speedway and pull low 13s at 104 on 91 octane. Even if scarlett were to employ additional tweaking the 112 would hinder, not help.
Regards,
Morgan
I mean no disrespect, but how much experience do you have working with high octane leaded fuels? 112 octane is far too much for a stock compression N/A application; the only reason to step up to such an octane are for the reasons I noted in my post above, or if one was running a siginificant amount of spray on a high compression motor. If I were to put a 100 shot on an LS4 car I'd be inclined to run VP Red (100 octane unleaded) or even VP Motorsport 103 (also unleaded) to give me a little extra insurance at the track. Prior to getting her Charger my spouse used to run a LSX guru/dyno-tuned '04 LS1 GTO out at CA Speedway and pull low 13s at 104 on 91 octane. Even if scarlett were to employ additional tweaking the 112 would hinder, not help.
Regards,
Morgan
Have a nice night,
Nacho.


