AI or LE
Why are the time stamps in the wrong order on the first picture? In all your other e-mail posts and in my experience with Outlook at work, the time stamps go from oldest to newest. In that first picture though the e-mails are jumbled up. It shows the one from the 19th first and the 18th at 10:24 and then the 18th at 10:39, that's not the way an e-mail trail looks and isn't the same as any other of your e-mails.
You have to admit, the way you are going about this is not normal. You lie about your blow-by problem, blaming it on cracked rings. You lie that the problem had anything to do with the heads and now that you've been exposed you try to spin your problem in a different direction.
As stated, you are very loyal and a true friend. Perhaps the next person to have this happen won't be as thoughtful and courteous and go to the lengths you have to protect a hack.
As stated, you are very loyal and a true friend. Perhaps the next person to have this happen won't be as thoughtful and courteous and go to the lengths you have to protect a hack.
The heads I had purchased from Lloyd had been taken down way too much and the valves were hitting the pistons. Myself and to sponsors on here that did the swap could only come up with that being the issue...
It's cool if you want to promote AI's stuff, they make great products but when you start talking about other peoples stuff then you just look like a tool.
I guess desperate times call for desperate measures...
You have to admit, the way you are going about this is not normal. You lie about your blow-by problem, blaming it on cracked rings. You lie that the problem had anything to do with the heads and now that you've been exposed you try to spin your problem in a different direction.
As stated, you are very loyal and a true friend. Perhaps the next person to have this happen won't be as thoughtful and courteous and go to the lengths you have to protect a hack.
As stated, you are very loyal and a true friend. Perhaps the next person to have this happen won't be as thoughtful and courteous and go to the lengths you have to protect a hack.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever
Verdad Gallardo Wow, as always, that's a great job of deflecting. You love to post your opinion so much and tell everyone to prove it, yet you don't practice what you preach? How does it go, "Do as I say and not as I do."
Yes, I called LE a hack. I said Elliot was lying about his story. Now lets see how frantic you all can get to change the topic since you feel you have something to run away with.
Here's a perfect example:
As stated the info is all there. Elliot tripped all over himself trying to get out of this mess yet not even the most faithful can dig him out of it now.
Here's a perfect example:
As stated the info is all there. Elliot tripped all over himself trying to get out of this mess yet not even the most faithful can dig him out of it now.
What info, you have irrefutable proof that he's lying where is it? Tripped all over himself how? I don't see anything that was posted where Elliott said LE blew up his motor or caused his rings to fail. Are you saying that something other than his rings caused his motor to fail? If so what? Heads cause massive blow by?
Why are the time stamps in the wrong order on the first picture? In all your other e-mail posts and in my experience with Outlook at work, the time stamps go from oldest to newest. In that first picture though the e-mails are jumbled up. It shows the one from the 19th first and the 18th at 10:24 and then the 18th at 10:39, that's not the way an e-mail trail looks and isn't the same as any other of your e-mails.
A bunch of them are like that, I'm guessing its from the different time zones.
. Outlook scales the e-mails in chronological order, doesn't matter where you reply, top, bottom or inside the orginal e-mail. Doesn't make any sense that they are out of order or that you can reply to an e-mail that you hadn't received yet. What info, you have irrefutable proof that he's lying where is it? Tripped all over himself how? I don't see anything that was posted where Elliott said LE blew up his motor or caused his rings to fail. Are you saying that something other than his rings caused his motor to fail? If so what? Heads cause massive blow by?
As stated, the info is there.
There is no law, it's called programming . Outlook scales the e-mails in chronological order, doesn't matter where you reply, top, bottom or inside the orginal e-mail. Doesn't make any sense that they are out of order or that you can reply to an e-mail that you hadn't received yet.
. Outlook scales the e-mails in chronological order, doesn't matter where you reply, top, bottom or inside the orginal e-mail. Doesn't make any sense that they are out of order or that you can reply to an e-mail that you hadn't received yet. Keep searching for that magic milk dud in a bag of dog ****.
Last edited by SS RRR; May 26, 2009 at 03:20 PM.
In this e-mail you have the newest on top, the 19th at 7:14, the reply below that is the 18th at 10:24 and the one below that is the 18th at 10:39. If the newest is always on top then the bottom two are in the wrong order. That and the fact you replied to an e-mail that you hadn't received yet looks out of place to me.
