LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Carb style intake manifold ? 's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2010 | 07:43 PM
  #1  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default Carb style intake manifold ? 's

Is it worth it? How much power did you guys pick up? I am thinkin of putting 1 on with a 90 mm TB and sheet metal elbow. What did you spend after all said and done?

Thanks
Old 01-20-2010 | 08:10 PM
  #2  
slownova73's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: Asheboro NC
Default

well alotta guys say its worht it it you need the intake for your power output. im going single plane, but keeping a carb, not EFI. it really depends on what your goals are i suppose,... oh and i have a dual plane LT1 intake for sale if ur interested
Old 01-20-2010 | 08:42 PM
  #3  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default

Originally Posted by slownova73
well alotta guys say its worht it it you need the intake for your power output. im going single plane, but keeping a carb, not EFI. it really depends on what your goals are i suppose,... oh and i have a dual plane LT1 intake for sale if ur interested


I will keep that in mind. I have the LT4 Edelbrock intake. The car is honestly a big ole turd below 4k but it pulls like a freight train around 5 to 7 k. I have been told my intake is whats killing me. I have ok gears 3.90's.

Right now my motor is around 540 at the crank I have been told goin carb style will pick it up around 50 if thats the case I dont mind spending over a grande on intake manifold.
Old 01-21-2010 | 12:25 AM
  #4  
slownova73's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: Asheboro NC
Default

well a dual plane would pick up your bottom end, but take away up top, goin carb is alot cheaper in the long run.
Old 01-21-2010 | 04:38 AM
  #5  
suicidal racing's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 8
From: Mass
Default

hey 73nova pm me what you want for the intake..either hit me up here our on yb..im over there more then here
Old 01-21-2010 | 04:40 AM
  #6  
Wicked94Z's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, Wa
Default

badmoon.... go carb with me. I'm looking into a prosystems e-85 conversion.
Old 01-21-2010 | 06:41 AM
  #7  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran

iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by BADMOON
I will keep that in mind. I have the LT4 Edelbrock intake. The car is honestly a big ole turd below 4k but it pulls like a freight train around 5 to 7 k. I have been told my intake is whats killing me. I have ok gears 3.90's.

Right now my motor is around 540 at the crank I have been told goin carb style will pick it up around 50 if thats the case I dont mind spending over a grande on intake manifold.
A big single plane will make that even more pronounced, taking away low end hp and tq for more up top.

Are you spraying? With your cam (high 240s IIRC?) you will want more aggressive gears then 3.90s in a NA 6speed. Some 4.11s minimum!

Trending Topics

Old 01-21-2010 | 07:11 AM
  #8  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 2
From: Mobile Ala
Default

Its all about the camshaft baby.
Old 01-21-2010 | 07:39 AM
  #9  
Wicked94Z's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by Puck
A big single plane will make that even more pronounced, taking away low end hp and tq for more up top.

Are you spraying? With your cam (high 240s IIRC?) you will want more aggressive gears then 3.90s in a NA 6speed. Some 4.11s minimum!
I agree, even 4.11s felt long to me, and i make pretty solid power below 4k rpm. I went 4.71s and they hit the spot

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Its all about the camshaft baby.
compression doesn't hurt either
Old 01-22-2010 | 01:15 PM
  #10  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default

Originally Posted by Puck
A big single plane will make that even more pronounced, taking away low end hp and tq for more up top.

Are you spraying? With your cam (high 240s IIRC?) you will want more aggressive gears then 3.90s in a NA 6speed. Some 4.11s minimum!

I will be spraying in the very near future. If I was goin NA I would definately put 4.56's in it but I was just trying to squeeze what I could from the motor to run a lil smaller shot. If swapping to a carb style manifold would pick up a lot with out changing my cam or doing more head work then I would do it but after talking to all of you and others I dont think with a HR camshaft and a motor that will not spin more than 7k I dont think it would benefit me too much and the money would be better spent somewhere else.

Last edited by BADMOON; 01-22-2010 at 01:21 PM.
Old 01-22-2010 | 01:18 PM
  #11  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
badmoon.... go carb with me. I'm looking into a prosystems e-85 conversion.

I really want to stay EFI with this motor man or I would. It just frickin sucks that nobody will come up with an intake manifold that we could just bolt on better than this piece o **** LT4 Edelbrock. Maybe if I threw the stocker back on there and ported it I could pick up more low end
Old 01-22-2010 | 01:20 PM
  #12  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Its all about the camshaft baby.

Yea I know SR but the valvetrain really wasnt in the budget at the time
Old 01-22-2010 | 04:51 PM
  #13  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 2
From: Mobile Ala
Default

Originally Posted by BADMOON
Yea I know SR but the valvetrain really wasnt in the budget at the time

Its not whether its a solid or hydraulic, its the cam grind itself.
Old 01-22-2010 | 07:35 PM
  #14  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Its not whether its a solid or hydraulic, its the cam grind itself.


Well if it was a solid roller it would pull hard all through the power band and not only above 5k which is the problem or not a problem but my preference . I want this thing to boil the tires at 4k not wait til 6k to decide well , its time to wake up.
Old 01-22-2010 | 09:20 PM
  #15  
kmracer's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
Default

Originally Posted by BADMOON
Well if it was a solid roller it would pull hard all through the power band and not only above 5k which is the problem or not a problem but my preference . I want this thing to boil the tires at 4k not wait til 6k to decide well , its time to wake up.
thats not necessarily true. your power/tq curve would look very similar, you'd just see gains.
Old 01-22-2010 | 09:21 PM
  #16  
kmracer's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
Default

get a cam custom spec'd, as well as a different intake. stay hyd roller.
Old 01-23-2010 | 12:56 PM
  #17  
Wicked94Z's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, Wa
Default

Badmoon, I have a REAL nice fully ported LT4 on my motor that I'll probably be selling when i get my tax return, I ended up making 480 rwhp on my setup with it on 100 octane, probably would have made more on c12. I would look into a cam from Bret Bauer, the cam he spec'd me was for a single plane and I still made rediculous power EVERYWHERE with the LT4 manifold. Peaked at 459 rwtq, and made 405 rwtq at 2800 rpm, 450 rwtq at 4000. low 240s/low 250s duration. Hydraulic roller lifter on mild SR lobes, and low, easy on parts spring pressure. Fastfatboy is running a SR cam from him, and his times speak for that combo.
Old 01-23-2010 | 01:26 PM
  #18  
kmracer's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
Badmoon, I have a REAL nice fully ported LT4 on my motor that I'll probably be selling when i get my tax return, I ended up making 480 rwhp on my setup with it on 100 octane, probably would have made more on c12. I would look into a cam from Bret Bauer, the cam he spec'd me was for a single plane and I still made rediculous power EVERYWHERE with the LT4 manifold. Peaked at 459 rwtq, and made 405 rwtq at 2800 rpm, 450 rwtq at 4000. low 240s/low 250s duration. Hydraulic roller lifter on mild SR lobes, and low, easy on parts spring pressure. Fastfatboy is running a SR cam from him, and his times speak for that combo.
wow, thats ****** awesome. what heads are you running? compression? specs of the rest of the motor?
Old 01-25-2010 | 08:33 PM
  #19  
BADMOON's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: A DEN
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
Badmoon, I have a REAL nice fully ported LT4 on my motor that I'll probably be selling when i get my tax return, I ended up making 480 rwhp on my setup with it on 100 octane, probably would have made more on c12. I would look into a cam from Bret Bauer, the cam he spec'd me was for a single plane and I still made rediculous power EVERYWHERE with the LT4 manifold. Peaked at 459 rwtq, and made 405 rwtq at 2800 rpm, 450 rwtq at 4000. low 240s/low 250s duration. Hydraulic roller lifter on mild SR lobes, and low, easy on parts spring pressure. Fastfatboy is running a SR cam from him, and his times speak for that combo.
Wicked thats close to what cam I am running now 247/258 108 LSA. Lemme know what you want for that intake manifold. Maybe it is my compression its very mild 11:2:1. I wanted this motor to handle a healthy dose of spray and not b at its limit. I think I am regretting that decision I should have went 12:0:1 . I do have 3.90 gears but I am only running a 26' MT drag radial so I figured it would be perfect.
Old 01-26-2010 | 06:31 AM
  #20  
moehorsepower's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 17
From: Texas
Default LT4 Intake

Just a note, Mine, LT4 Heads & Intake (Forced Inducted)
648 RWHP 612 TQ on Pump
722 RWHP 713 TQ on the Fast Gas...


Quick Reply: Carb style intake manifold ? 's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.