Carb style intake manifold ? 's
#1
Carb style intake manifold ? 's
Is it worth it? How much power did you guys pick up? I am thinkin of putting 1 on with a 90 mm TB and sheet metal elbow. What did you spend after all said and done?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
well alotta guys say its worht it it you need the intake for your power output. im going single plane, but keeping a carb, not EFI. it really depends on what your goals are i suppose,... oh and i have a dual plane LT1 intake for sale if ur interested
#3
I will keep that in mind. I have the LT4 Edelbrock intake. The car is honestly a big ole turd below 4k but it pulls like a freight train around 5 to 7 k. I have been told my intake is whats killing me. I have ok gears 3.90's.
Right now my motor is around 540 at the crank I have been told goin carb style will pick it up around 50 if thats the case I dont mind spending over a grande on intake manifold.
#7
I will keep that in mind. I have the LT4 Edelbrock intake. The car is honestly a big ole turd below 4k but it pulls like a freight train around 5 to 7 k. I have been told my intake is whats killing me. I have ok gears 3.90's.
Right now my motor is around 540 at the crank I have been told goin carb style will pick it up around 50 if thats the case I dont mind spending over a grande on intake manifold.
Right now my motor is around 540 at the crank I have been told goin carb style will pick it up around 50 if thats the case I dont mind spending over a grande on intake manifold.
Are you spraying? With your cam (high 240s IIRC?) you will want more aggressive gears then 3.90s in a NA 6speed. Some 4.11s minimum!
Trending Topics
#9
compression doesn't hurt either
#10
I will be spraying in the very near future. If I was goin NA I would definately put 4.56's in it but I was just trying to squeeze what I could from the motor to run a lil smaller shot. If swapping to a carb style manifold would pick up a lot with out changing my cam or doing more head work then I would do it but after talking to all of you and others I dont think with a HR camshaft and a motor that will not spin more than 7k I dont think it would benefit me too much and the money would be better spent somewhere else.
Last edited by BADMOON; 01-22-2010 at 01:21 PM.
#11
I really want to stay EFI with this motor man or I would. It just frickin sucks that nobody will come up with an intake manifold that we could just bolt on better than this piece o **** LT4 Edelbrock. Maybe if I threw the stocker back on there and ported it I could pick up more low end
#14
Well if it was a solid roller it would pull hard all through the power band and not only above 5k which is the problem or not a problem but my preference . I want this thing to boil the tires at 4k not wait til 6k to decide well , its time to wake up.
#15
thats not necessarily true. your power/tq curve would look very similar, you'd just see gains.
#17
Badmoon, I have a REAL nice fully ported LT4 on my motor that I'll probably be selling when i get my tax return, I ended up making 480 rwhp on my setup with it on 100 octane, probably would have made more on c12. I would look into a cam from Bret Bauer, the cam he spec'd me was for a single plane and I still made rediculous power EVERYWHERE with the LT4 manifold. Peaked at 459 rwtq, and made 405 rwtq at 2800 rpm, 450 rwtq at 4000. low 240s/low 250s duration. Hydraulic roller lifter on mild SR lobes, and low, easy on parts spring pressure. Fastfatboy is running a SR cam from him, and his times speak for that combo.
#18
Badmoon, I have a REAL nice fully ported LT4 on my motor that I'll probably be selling when i get my tax return, I ended up making 480 rwhp on my setup with it on 100 octane, probably would have made more on c12. I would look into a cam from Bret Bauer, the cam he spec'd me was for a single plane and I still made rediculous power EVERYWHERE with the LT4 manifold. Peaked at 459 rwtq, and made 405 rwtq at 2800 rpm, 450 rwtq at 4000. low 240s/low 250s duration. Hydraulic roller lifter on mild SR lobes, and low, easy on parts spring pressure. Fastfatboy is running a SR cam from him, and his times speak for that combo.
#19
Badmoon, I have a REAL nice fully ported LT4 on my motor that I'll probably be selling when i get my tax return, I ended up making 480 rwhp on my setup with it on 100 octane, probably would have made more on c12. I would look into a cam from Bret Bauer, the cam he spec'd me was for a single plane and I still made rediculous power EVERYWHERE with the LT4 manifold. Peaked at 459 rwtq, and made 405 rwtq at 2800 rpm, 450 rwtq at 4000. low 240s/low 250s duration. Hydraulic roller lifter on mild SR lobes, and low, easy on parts spring pressure. Fastfatboy is running a SR cam from him, and his times speak for that combo.