gregrob

iTrader: (8)

336hp / 355tq

I'll post the sheet later. It has an amazing tq curve. At 2000 rpm it goes straight to 330ft lbs, climbs to 355 and holds it almost the whole run.

Definitely shows why its so much fun to drive.

robsquikz28

iTrader: (246)

WTF, I thought you were building a beast. I dont get this post at all?

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

You obviously thought wrong. My **** is baby cam only and spray. No spray numbers today, couldn't get the bottle filled and clutch wouldn't hold it anyway. Will have spray numbers after I get a clutch.

jayz28

iTrader: (3)

What cam are you using?

z_speedfreak

iTrader: (3)

my $ is on a custom cam he tailored himself.. so how bout ballpark specs?
nice numbers for your altitude! how much do you spray?

thehammer69

iTrader: (2)

I designed his cam. Specifically for his altitude. How much are you willing to pay us for the specs?

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

True it's a custom cam. I wanted to do a custom one from the beginning, tweaked for my altitude and setup etc. thehammer helped me do that.

We ended up using XFI lobes because they did exactly what we needed to do.

Rough specs are less than 220 intake, and .565 lift on both sides 111+a lot lsa

I took what I learned off this cam and thehammer again HELPED ME design z28camaro30ann's cam and it did 401 with le2 heads untuned and it has an awesome powerband too. Very fun to drive and will pick up even more tq when he's not super lean in the mid range / top as he is now.

I'm overall very impressed with how these XFI cams act. Seems like they get a bad rap because retards want to use the biggest one made and throw it in a stock longblock and when it doesn't perform like they want, everyone says the XFI cams are junk. With some custom tweaks and a GOOD VALVETRAIN the XFI lobes are great. I drive the car a lot, been using it for work lately and driving hundreds of miles a week and the valvetrain is rock solid. You just have to use good components.

Working on scanning the dyno sheet now

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

With STD correction factor (average 4% higher than SAE) I would have made the same hp and way more tq as the XE230/236 posted on here a few days ago.

Wouldn't you guys have a **** fit then.

Wicked94Z

iTrader: (26)

hm... ICL?

thehammer69

iTrader: (2)

he meant to say "+ a lot of advance"

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

No I meant to say 111+alot advance

Badazz 97 TA

iTrader: (18)

thats it?.......

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

What's it?

Wicked94Z

iTrader: (26)

about what you'd expect up top from a cam with -3 overlap @.050. any reason you retarded the exhaust so much besides emissions?

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

Doesn't have 3 degrees

Wicked94Z

iTrader: (26)

just looking in the comp catalog... i see a 214 and 224 lobe with .565 lift. just taking a stab. but still, why run the exhaust so retarded?

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

Well thats not what it is. Side effect of advancing it the way we needed to. Works awesome

Wicked94Z

iTrader: (26)

I don't see how valve events can be described as a "side effect."

SPEED#1

iTrader: (14)

ALL this time I thought you were building a beast I was definately wrong about that!