Why are we still holding on to these dinosaurs?
#181
I need a razorblade a hot bath and some emo music now.
Last edited by LSWHO; 08-18-2010 at 05:02 PM.
#182
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
This thread should have been titled "Why are we still trying to convince ourselves and others that driving a LT1 makes us unique unlike the LS1 guys." You never see threads about gay **** like this going on in the LSx forums...why, because there is nothing to prove over there because it's already been proven.
LSWHO...You are hands down the biggest boner on this site. Douche's like yourself need to take a long hard look in the mirror and then punch yourself. Your car sucks too.
LSWHO...You are hands down the biggest boner on this site. Douche's like yourself need to take a long hard look in the mirror and then punch yourself. Your car sucks too.
#184
#186
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
Stock ported head/intake 355 LT1 makes more. oh did I mention it has stock ported heads and not aftermarket heads.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/multimedi...ack-video.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/multimedi...ack-video.html
#188
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
1. You have an LT1
2. You are on the LS1's dick
3. You talk good about Mustang and bash the Camaros
4.
5. And yes THE CAMARO IS 200lbs+ heavier. Most people can't even lift 200lbs,
6. The new Camaro is just as fast as the new Mustang. The new Camaro is 12.90 1/4, off the show room floor...
2. You are on the LS1's dick
3. You talk good about Mustang and bash the Camaros
4.
5. And yes THE CAMARO IS 200lbs+ heavier. Most people can't even lift 200lbs,
6. The new Camaro is just as fast as the new Mustang. The new Camaro is 12.90 1/4, off the show room floor...
This thread should have been titled "Why are we still trying to convince ourselves and others that driving a LT1 makes us unique unlike the LS1 guys." You never see threads about gay **** like this going on in the LSx forums...why, because there is nothing to prove over there because it's already been proven.
LSWHO...You are hands down the biggest boner on this site. Douche's like yourself need to take a long hard look in the mirror and then punch yourself. Your car sucks too.
LSWHO...You are hands down the biggest boner on this site. Douche's like yourself need to take a long hard look in the mirror and then punch yourself. Your car sucks too.
#189
#192
These threads make me lmao.
-they are both slow stock
-they can both be made to go faster then a sane person would care to
-they are both old news by today's standards
-they both become wallet wars when you really start modding them
What is there to argue about anymore? Its all preference. I could have had a whole built ls1 car for what I have just in my engine. If you don't agree with my choices...**** you, its my money
-they are both slow stock
-they can both be made to go faster then a sane person would care to
-they are both old news by today's standards
-they both become wallet wars when you really start modding them
What is there to argue about anymore? Its all preference. I could have had a whole built ls1 car for what I have just in my engine. If you don't agree with my choices...**** you, its my money
#193
I alway have the hate for the lt1 and deep love as the same time, like for last 2 day I been kick the camaro, and today I vacum and armor all inside the car ( it still rains as hell here, so no wash ). LT1 just special.
#194
11 Second Club
It has nothing to do with swinging from the LS1. It has to do with reality. You aren't in it and it shows. How many 5th gens have you seen match what the 2011 is doing now? I can think of none. Absolutely zero. As said, the 2011 GT has been in the 9's with a completely stock engine. Where are the 5th gens that have done the same, which brings me to the question of how do I swing from the LS1 when I state it's not in the same league as the new Coyote engine? Do you see your ignorant contradiction? Keep thinking the 5th gen is just as fast. You are the type that I laugh at when you find out the hard way you are wrong. Out of curiosity, how old are you?
#195
12 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Catlettsburg, Ky
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First off, I was refering to the lq4, which comes standard in almost every 8-lug gm vehicle built after 2000 or so. 300hp/360tq out of a 9.4:1 dish piston, huge chamber headed motor on 87 octane. Definately by no means "max effort"
and while i agree that an lt1 can be stroked to 383ci, an make more than 403/413. I know damn well it won do it with a rock solid idle, and had nearly as clean of A tail pipe emission as a stock l92.
I'm not an ls1 nut swinger like most of the guys that invaded this thread. I'm just stating facts: it's tough to beat technology.
#198
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
Yes I agree... I have been a lt1 fan since 1993, when my grandmother(that's right lol) bought a brand new red a4 z28... Then my mom bought a brand new 1995 red a4 z28. I ended up buying a 1996 m6 z28(red too lol) in 2000 and owned it for 9yrs before i sold it... So Im definately an lt1 fan to say the least... unfortunately over the years I realized the lsx platform is much easier to work with, especially from a tuning standpoint. I would definatelly own a lt1 car again, unfortunately I cant afford both lol... Just wanted to clear this up a bit because I feel some might think otherwise! My last post was just pokin fun at achotrod for the whole " compare stock block" topic... I really could care less, this debate don't bother me one bit... Im a car enthusist and don't nutthug any particular platform!
#200
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: colorado springs Elevation: 6035 ft
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Stock motor,c4,250 shot,suspension and weight reduction. HOLY ****!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopO...layer_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopO...layer_embedded