LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

IM Thinking about a 800+HP LT1 turbo build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2010, 02:10 PM
  #101  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CWBHOOD
yea but i think the lt1 is a stronger and can take the beatings of hp over a ls...
You might want to talk to skinnies who just went 8's on a stock shortblock 5.3 motor.
Old 09-26-2010, 02:24 PM
  #102  
SRZ
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
SRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,168
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by green95vert
Heads should be ported. Boost is boost, nothing more than a measure of restriction. Turbos just get their power from a different source, yet deliver it to the same place. The more headflow you have, the more power you will make whether it means NA, turbo, SC, nitrous. You might make 600rwhp @12psi on stock heads, but make the same power on ported heads @9psi. More cfm means more power PERIOD. SC or turbo, it makes no difference what-so-ever. Exhaust is just as critical on a turbo car also. Just because it has backpressure, that doesn't mean its not moving really fast, its just pressurized. Same concept yet again, more flow, the more it will support. Exhaust makes a difference in how fast it spools also, hence why my intake duration is 212 and exhaust is 226. Good luck getting 800rwhp out of stock heads without running a ton of boost. I think I'll get some ported AFRs and crack off 800rwhp at about half the boost it would take to make stock un-ported castings. Not to mention the down low out of boost power you'll get. That 88mm Garrett doesn't hit even 1psi until 4200rpm.
Originally Posted by Fastbird93
Silas, I tihnk this is the first time I'm going to disagree with you, that's on the ported head thing. They most definitely should be ported. Boost = restriction. Ported heads = lower "seen" boost but more air movement which = more power and easier on the motor because you're not trying to force the air in as hard.
Under any other given circumstance I'd agree w/ everything posted above. But I know a guy w/ a TPI Vette w/ only a forged crank, IRON heads untouched, a baby cam in 210 range w/ a 2.56 gear bust a 115mph on a 1/8the mile track all day long...oh turbo is a 76mm and 14psi. The guy is legendary around these parts and builds turbo cars like nobody's business and is quick to say leave the heads alone.
Old 09-26-2010, 02:28 PM
  #103  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
green95vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Terre Haute,IN
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
Exactly how many hours and a round about dollar figure do you have in a setup like that, if you don't mind being asked?
Engine alone wasn't too bad honestly, about $6000ish. Now hours...I'd guess about 450-550ish. Started with a set of BBK headers, T6 flange, and a lot of piping. Ended up with that.

8.9cr, built 383, BBK headers, 2.5" merge pipes, dual 40mm JGS WGs, Garrett GT-88, 4" downpipe out the fender/nose, Motron 80lb injectors, Devils Own Alky/meth, 24x12x4" IC, Tial BOV, 58mm TB, etc. She's been a fun one
Old 09-26-2010, 02:30 PM
  #104  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
green95vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Terre Haute,IN
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SRZ
Under any other given circumstance I'd agree w/ everything posted above. But I know a guy w/ a TPI Vette w/ only a forged crank, IRON heads untouched, a baby cam in 210 range w/ a 2.56 gear bust a 115mph on a 1/8the mile track all day long...oh turbo is a 76mm and 14psi. The guy is legendary around these parts and builds turbo cars like nobody's business and is quick to say leave the heads alone.
Oh I wasn't saying you can't go fast on stock heads, its definitely possible. Its just MUCH easier with ported heads.
Old 09-26-2010, 02:32 PM
  #105  
Launching!
 
Michigan Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
The fastest 6-speed LT1 was with an eagle 355 build, ported lt1 castings, and an 88mm turbo.

Wow, I didn't know they made LT1's in 78. Awesome run dude!
Old 09-26-2010, 02:34 PM
  #106  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LSWHO
How much is it to fill a bottle and how many runs do you get? That'll add up.
40-45 for a 10lb about 60-65 for a 15lb bottle it would take a lot of spray to spend 25K+ and its not all at once either.
Old 09-26-2010, 02:39 PM
  #107  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
LSWHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
40-45 for a 10lb about 60-65 for a 15lb bottle it would take a lot of spray to spend 25K+ and its not all at once either.
So you've started with a stock car, added nitrous and are running what these guys are? Doesn't sound like your story to me. You're leaving out everything you've already done and comparing one single part of your build to their ENTIRE build.
Old 09-26-2010, 02:41 PM
  #108  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
LSWHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As a comparison, what kind of power is Tony Sheppard putting down compared to them, and how much has he invested. I'd say that's a comparison. You're car isn't even close to their league.
Old 09-26-2010, 03:52 PM
  #109  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They are talking about a turbo set up not a chassis set up. Id have to rebuild the entire motor and get all the Turbo parts, fuel system, tune etc. It would cost a **** ton to convert.

BTW Im about 600+hp on spray(200shot) so Im not that far off the 800hp goal the OP has and Ive put about 20k into the car already. Just about EVERY SINGLE PART has been changed in my car.
Old 09-26-2010, 04:25 PM
  #110  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Sikora speaks LT1 Gospel.

...He's pretty bright for such a low post count! .
Old 09-26-2010, 04:26 PM
  #111  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
They are talking about a turbo set up not a chassis set up. Id have to rebuild the entire motor and get all the Turbo parts, fuel system, tune etc. It would cost a **** ton to convert.

BTW Im about 600+hp on spray(200shot) so Im not that far off the 800hp goal the OP has and Ive put about 20k into the car already. Just about EVERY SINGLE PART has been changed in my car.
Not sure if serious. 600hp isn't even close to 800hp.
Old 09-26-2010, 04:48 PM
  #112  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
LSWHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Not sure if serious. 600hp isn't even close to 800hp.
Equivalent of saying a less than stock LT1 is close to a heads/cam LT1.

Again, terrible comparison.
Old 09-26-2010, 05:27 PM
  #113  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LSWHO what are you even talking about??? Im not trying to make a compairison. Im saying it would cost big bucks to convert, more bucks than I have to spend. So Ill stay with spray.

SD24 I know 600 isnt 800 but could be a $500 DP set up away. Not a full FI rebuild away.
Old 09-26-2010, 09:48 PM
  #114  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
LSWHO what are you even talking about??? Im not trying to make a compairison. Im saying it would cost big bucks to convert, more bucks than I have to spend. So Ill stay with spray.

SD24 I know 600 isnt 800 but could be a $500 DP set up away. Not a full FI rebuild away.
So you're shortblock can handle a 400 shot? Not to mention getting that power to the ground on the launch. It's a lot different than running 12's.
Old 09-26-2010, 10:08 PM
  #115  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I dont see why not. Chassis is pretty much done, I have a built th350 and the only part of my engine Id worry about in the factory rods which do have arp hardware so It might last a while it might not. In the mean time i have a nice 4bolt block and cola crank that just need some pistons and rods. Vtechs car seems to do fine on a factory shortblock

Also if I remember right my car has gone quicker than yours has ever, and has every single time out, until I changed it.
If your referring to my 12sec pass at the shootout(which by the way you werent there) anyone who knows **** about cars knows my car is not set up to run NA at the moment and I had a bad day driving the first time out with the new set up.
Old 09-27-2010, 05:31 PM
  #116  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
LSWHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
LSWHO what are you even talking about???
This is what I'm talking about:

Originally Posted by AChotrod
The cost of turbos is why I have a nitrous kit.
Now you say:
Originally Posted by AChotrod
Im saying it would cost big bucks to convert, more bucks than I have to spend. So Ill stay with spray.
That's nothing like what you said... at all.

You made a comment about how cheap nitrous is, yet you are not in the same league as their turbo car. When at their power level it's all preference. The builds are going to be very similar in costs, not as you said.

Last edited by LSWHO; 09-27-2010 at 05:36 PM.
Old 09-27-2010, 05:34 PM
  #117  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
LSWHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
So you're shortblock can handle a 400 shot?
Originally Posted by AChotrod
I dont see why not.
Isn't the general rule that you can spray about half the power you make NA?

You're telling everybody here that you want to spray enough to DOUBLE your power and you think it's safe?
Old 09-27-2010, 05:42 PM
  #118  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How would you know?? You dont have either and havent built either from what I can tell. N2o is 100x cheaper vs a FI system. **** my entire N20 system is less than just the turbo alone.
Old 09-27-2010, 05:44 PM
  #119  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LSWHO
Isn't the general rule that you can spray about half the power you make NA?

You're telling everybody here that you want to spray enough to DOUBLE your power and you think it's safe?
there is no rules its either the motor blows or goes. I also didnt say Im going to shoot 400 but could with a few upgrades
Old 09-27-2010, 05:46 PM
  #120  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
LSWHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
How would you know?? You dont have either and havent built either from what I can tell. N2o is 100x cheaper vs a FI system. **** my entire N20 system is less than just the turbo alone.
And they make a lot more power than you.

A junkyard build can keep up with your car. (fyi a junkyard turbo build is cheaper than your build)


Quick Reply: IM Thinking about a 800+HP LT1 turbo build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.