LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8
View Poll Results: Would you like to see a Bolt on only heads up style class at the 2011 LTXshootout?
YES! i think thats a great idea!
70
89.74%
NO! waste of time no one will show!
2
2.56%
who cares?
3
3.85%
camaroracing12 stfu and stop posting garbage like this!
3
3.85%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

New class proposal for 2011 ltxshootout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 09:12 AM
  #101  
Shon Herron's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
From: SC
Default

no metal cut at 3100# with 235# driver with 12bolt and no fancy stuff.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #102  
1961ba427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 1
From: Milledgeville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by bufmatmuslepants
I dont think there should be a minimum weight, just make it that you cannot CUT any metal out of the car. Im already down to 3225, which is too light for the proposed 3400lb class, and theres still weight to be pulled without cutting. And what if we have a midget or 85 lb girl in a 1LE car? Some people have the $$$ for lightweight suspension pieces, some dont and just gut the crap out of their cars. Maybe 3100 should be the limit, 3400 is way too heavy.
I respectfully disagree, because while you or just about anyone can meet a 3400 lb class and be competitive (weight wise) alot of bolt on cars are not gutted, don't have chromemoly everything suspension, still have A/C, P/S, etc. I believe those true DD cars will be the bulk of this class, so they should be allowed a decent chance. Alot wouldn't even bother entering their DD bolt on 3,600# car to compete with 3100# strippers....and there would go alot of your entry field.

It would be alot cheaper for those of you who UNbolted stuff from your car to bolt it back in to "bulk-up" and meet the 3400# minimum. I know there are lots of NHRA rules about adding ballast safely, but anyone can re-install seats, carpet, spare, jack, speakers, interior panels, etc. to get back alot of the weight they gutted.

The only other way I think the gutted or really LW cars should be allowed to run at the low weight is with some kind of handicap added. I know we are talking a heads up class, which is what I think is always best. (Bracket racing is almost like the drag racing equivelant of communism!!) But, there could be a staggered start for the cars under the minimum. Say.....start their beams .001 th second for every 10# underweight?? That would be in lines with the 100# = .010th theory.

Personally, I would not like to see it run that way, but I would rather that than see a field of really good DD bolt on cars dessimated by a couple gutted, stripped &/or big $$$ lightweight cars.

Edit: I thought we were talking about 3400# with driver? That would keep driver weight out of the equation. I am not hung up on 3400#....I just think it needs to be a number that accomodates the real DD cars and keeps them competitive enough to encourage participation.

Also, I LOVE the B-bodies. Plus there is alot of information to be shared among fellow LTX'ers. Afterall, it's the LTXShootout not the LTX/F-bodyShootout. I do see how it complicates an already busy day for the organizers. Hope everyone can get it worked out. Sharing the event with them would mean sharing planning and expenses to ease that pain maybe?

Last edited by 1961ba427; Nov 27, 2010 at 10:01 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #103  
bufmatmuslepants's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,280
Likes: 49
From: Hampstead, NC
Default

the 1/10th of a second per 100# rule would be 0.1s, so every 10#s would be 0.01. I dont really like bracket racing, much prefer leaving the same time as the other guy. If were making a weight limit then to be competitive you have to be at the limit, and have every single bolton. Guy with the most boltons, IE the most money, will win. Same as if you have a guy with less weight will win. This isnt IROC racing where every car is the exact same, there are going to be differences. Like it was said earlier, most of the guys are 18-22 year olds who are broke college kids. Gutting is cheaper than an electric wp, or roller rockers and springs. If you really wanna make it fair then you have to put in the rules that everyone has to have headers, Y pipe, catback, roller rockers, electric waterpump, tune, gears, and weigh exactly 3400lbs. Right there you lose alot of people. Let people run what they have, but limit it to no cutting up the car.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:23 PM
  #104  
1961ba427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 1
From: Milledgeville, GA
Default

Yeah I meant a hundredth per ten lbs....goofed with my decimal point in a hurry. LOL

You are right about the not liking bracket racing stuff...I already said I don't either. I don't think everything should be EQUAL or even fair. I just don't care to see a class where the super lightweight cars dominate. I don't think very many people would care to see that UNLESS it was a class within a class (which I don't think there is time for). I think a more realistic weight would keep things where the most people could have FUN! That's what this class should be about.

As far as running a non-cut up stripper vs. gutted vs. big $$ LW stuff.... I say to each his own there as long as the car meets weight. Why disallow a non-stripped daily driver with a tubular K member and stuff but allow a gutted car? It makes no sense to limit which direction the owner took in building his car, or how much he spent as long as it made an agreed upon weight limit and was truely bolt on only.

If someone chooses to run a heavier car then that's their choice, but I personally think most people want a limit that is within reason to include DD cars. Whether they are owned by middle aged guys (or women) who have cash, but just want a fun driver or broke college kids.....OR a broke middle aged single daddy with custody of his kids!! LOL

Maybe we need a seperate thread and poll to vote on a weight limit and other rules?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #105  
96silverram's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1
Default

Tony,
That is great news about the possible marriage of the B-body guys into the fold. Keep us posted!


I think the weight limit needs to be set at something reasonable for the DD class. Personally my car probably weighs in the 3550 range with all the factory items in the car and working. I prefer to run a true DD class so that everyone has a reason to try and win. This is certainly a difficult task, but many more guys like myself will probably participate if they think there is a chance of winning I'm committed more than ever to actually taking my car to the 2011 LTx race for something like the daily driver class.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #106  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 3
From: Haverhill, Mass
Default

Lets not complicate things. Imho a weight minimum of 3300 or 3400lbs raceweight would be fine. And stick with the bolt on rules set by gmhtp. Simple and done. I daily drive my bolt on car at 3275lbs with full interior. It def is possible. The ultra light weight cars would have to add weight and the guys who are full weight and want to be competitive will have to cut weight. You have to meet in the middle. All these crazy rule proposals complicate things keep it simple
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #107  
1961ba427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 1
From: Milledgeville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by CamaroRacing12
Lets not complicate things. Imho a weight minimum of 3300 or 3400lbs raceweight would be fine. And stick with the bolt on rules set by gmhtp. Simple and done. I daily drive my bolt on car at 3275lbs with full interior. It def is possible. The ultra light weight cars would have to add weight and the guys who are full weight and want to be competitive will have to cut weight. You have to meet in the middle. All these crazy rule proposals complicate things keep it simple
That's pretty much what I have been saying. I like the higher of the two weights you stated myself. I wasn't crazy about the noise requirements set by GMHTP but I know that was more the track's requirements. I hope that isn't the case for the shootout. I do think cars should be muffled in this class, but I think pretty much anyone's Loudmouth, or true duals with mufflers, and the like should be allowed. Anything that would be street legal noise wise.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:52 PM
  #108  
Shon Herron's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
From: SC
Default

GMHTP did not have any weight requirements but it did need interior panels and 1 seat.
with weight limits I dont see how this is any different than the 12 second heads up class, the way I thought it was done was who ever was the closest to 12.00 won that class, this is what you got if you have weights, now if you are looking for appearance then I can support some carpet/floor covering and interior panels and how ever many seats you want to require.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-5

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-8

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #109  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 3
From: Haverhill, Mass
Default

Originally Posted by Shon Herron
GMHTP did not have any weight requirements but it did need interior panels and 1 seat.
with weight limits I dont see how this is any different than the 12 second heads up class, the way I thought it was done was who ever was the closest to 12.00 won that class, this is what you got if you have weights, now if you are looking for appearance then I can support some carpet/floor covering and interior panels and how ever many seats you want to require.
That could be a good route to go in. No weight limit but have to have an interior. Either way is fine with me i guess it really is all up to tony and the organizers when it comes down to it.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #110  
Shon Herron's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
From: SC
Default

Got to think about the 'tech' of something like this, with 40+ other cars and limited # of people to tech in the cars it has to be a "quick".
I have volunteered to running scales so that should be done for all classes, and for this BO class I would think we would want to keep up with the weights just as an FYI.
it would be easy to look in interior and say go or not go then assume hooking up vac gauge (per GMHTP) that would be noted.
but if you call for floor covering, need to specify if it is from the front all the way to the back over fuel tank area or just to the rear of front seats.
The interior 'has to be there' for the photos that you hope get made and in GMHTP, i understand that 'rule'.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 02:50 AM
  #111  
Kall's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Derby, KS
Default

Lets keep this going!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #112  
firehawk238's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
Default

as far as checking for cams go, just do like the circle track guys do and require the engine to pull a certain amount of vacume at a specified RPM and at the end of the shootout just do a tech inspection on the cars that run in the top 3. if they dont pass tech then they are DQ'd and move down to the next 3. it would still give people room to slip in with a cam, and even some head porting on stock castings but would definately limit them to a very small cam and would have them limited on how much difference their heads would make for them.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #113  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 3
From: Haverhill, Mass
Default

that is a good idea ^^ just inspect the top 3 cars to make it less of a hassle. i mean the track numbers wont lie, if someone has a cam or heads ported people will know.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:13 AM
  #114  
ZGOBYBY's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
From: Harrison Township, Michigan
Default

Although I totally give my 100% support in this class taking place, we will need commitment from proposed participants. Secondly, I can understand if the time management with additional participant factor is going to play a large role in if this can happen or not. Sounds like their will be a definite need for more money for the added time. This I think is the most important factor to look at right now, for any of this to happen.

My boys here in Michigan are excited as hell for this bolt-on class, and we went out looking a rollers last week to get started on a bolt-on car.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:45 PM
  #115  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 3
From: Haverhill, Mass
Default

^^^ hey no building nasty bolt on cars, i proposed this class so i could win it duhhhhhh lol j/p

yea we def will need more cash flow but maybe with the added racer support their will be added sponsor support? who knows.

oh btw do u think i could tow my roughly 3500lbs car with a open trailer with my fatherr's 01 f-150 4 door? 18 hours one way? i dont know much about towing
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #116  
ZGOBYBY's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
From: Harrison Township, Michigan
Default

I towed my 3700 pound Z on an open trailer with a '05 Silverado 2500HD, but that was only from southeast Michigan and it was only an 8 hour trip. Not sure if that helps too much.

Oh, and most definitely, I will stop the nasty bolt-on car building right away. LOL
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #117  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 3
From: Haverhill, Mass
Default

Originally Posted by ZGOBYBY
I towed my 3700 pound Z on an open trailer with a '05 Silverado 2500HD, but that was only from southeast Michigan and it was only an 8 hour trip. Not sure if that helps too much.

Oh, and most definitely, I will stop the nasty bolt-on car building right away. LOL
hahahha oh thx lol

yea that dosent help me much. i know a 2500HD could handle it no sweat, just trying to see if anyone has done a long tow with a f-150 4 door or equivilent. its got the 5.4 liter
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:03 PM
  #118  
quik95lt1's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 12
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by CamaroRacing12
^^^ hey no building nasty bolt on cars, i proposed this class so i could win it duhhhhhh lol j/p

yea we def will need more cash flow but maybe with the added racer support their will be added sponsor support? who knows.

oh btw do u think i could tow my roughly 3500lbs car with a open trailer with my fatherr's 01 f-150 4 door? 18 hours one way? i dont know much about towing
dont see why not.....i towed my car at 3450lbs + my trailer plus three people in the truck with two tool boxes....20 gallons of race gas and two sets of tires 6 hours down to NJ with no issue.....i wouldn't be afraid at all towing down to KY with mine......we took my dads yukon this year and even that with the little 5.3 made it just fine.....think im taking my truck next year with the fresh 355 in it....more space and more power for them pennsylvania hills lol
we'll travel together too tony just incase we both start busting **** on the way lol
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:04 PM
  #119  
Ray@Nitrous Outlet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I pulled mine to the first 2 shootouts with a 1/2 Ton quad cab dodge.....no issues at all.

that F150 should easily be able to do it
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #120  
duh's Avatar
duh
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2
From: burbs of chi-town
Default

I've towed a 3500# cavalier behind a trailblazer with the baby 4.2L for 8 hrs without an issue....you'll be fine.

BTW, what's the point of a DD class if you don't drive your car to the shootout....That would be a better rule IMHO.....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.

story-0
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-1
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-2
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-3
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-5
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-8
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-9
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE