balancing
The "over-balancing" I have heard about has nothing to do with what RPM you're spinning the motor to.
Over balancing is just adding an additional 1/2% to 1% to the "exact" calculated bobweight, and then balancing the rotating assembly for that "new" bobweight.
For example, say all the rotating assembly componets you're going to use in an engine build, require an "exact" 1,500 gram "calculated" bobweight. To "over balance" this rotating assembly by 1%, you would add, 1% times 1,500 grams = 15 (additional) grams, for a total of a 1,515 gram bobweight, and then "balance" the assembly using this new "over-balanced" 1,515 gram bobweight.
Using a 1,515 gram bobweight, instead of the "exactly" called for 1,500 gram bobweight, (in this example) ........ would give you an engine "over-balanced" by 1%. Got it???
And, just for the OP, yes most all NASCAR engines are "over-balanced" by between 1/2% to 1%.
The "over-balancing" I have heard about has nothing to do with what RPM you're spinning the motor to.
Over balancing is just adding an additional 1/2% to 1% to the "exact" calculated bobweight, and then balancing the rotating assembly for that "new" bobweight.
For example, say all the rotating assembly componets you're going to use in an engine build, require an "exact" 1,500 gram "calculated" bobweight. To "over balance" this rotating assembly by 1%, you would add, 1% times 1,500 grams = 15 (additional) grams, for a total of a 1,515 gram bobweight, and then "balance" the assembly using this new "over-balanced" 1,515 gram bobweight.
Using a 1,515 gram bobweight, instead of the "exactly" called for 1,500 gram bobweight, (in this example) ........ would give you an engine "over-balanced" by 1%. Got it???
And, just for the OP, yes most all NASCAR engines are "over-balanced" by between 1/2% to 1%.

Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

My comment regarding "having nothing to do with RPM" was aimed at poster duh, who seemed to imply to the OP that an engine builder will balance an engine differently if you tell them to balance it for 7,000 RPM vs 8,000 RPM; and that is definitely ...... WRONG!

The "usage" example I cited, namely NASCAR engines ........ "pionerred" the concept of "over-balancing" engines for high RPM racing, because, unlike in drag racing ........... their motors run for hours at 9,000+ RPM versus just seconds ...... like they do in 1/4 mile racing.

In truth, ANY engine can benefit from "over-balancing", it will just be MORE beneficial at higher RPM.

Hope this clears things up.
Last edited by 97 6speed z; Jul 18, 2011 at 03:00 PM. Reason: Spelling
But again this seems it would add unnecessary wear on the bearings due to more force being applied to them. Granted that could be accounted for by loosening up the bearing tolerances a bit to allow more of an oil cushion...
(d*mn engine theory)

My comment regarding "having nothing to do with RPM" was aimed at poster duh, who seemed to imply to the OP that an engine builder will balance an engine differently if you tell them to balance it for 7,000 RPM vs 8,000 RPM; and that is definitely ...... WRONG!

The "usage" example I cited, namely NASCAR engines ........ "pionerred" the concept of "over-balancing" engines for high RPM racing, because, unlike in drag racing ........... their motors run for hours at 9,000+ RPM versus just seconds ...... like they do in 1/4 mile racing.

In truth, ANY engine can benefit from "over-balancing", it will just be MORE beneficial at higher RPM.

Hope this clears things up.



