LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Ignition Timing Advance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2021 | 08:14 AM
  #1  
nickp's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 412
Likes: 21
From: Southern Michigan
Default Ignition Timing Advance

How much timing are you guys logging on a WOT pass? I am attempting to tune my 24X H/C/I project myself with HP Tuners. Just curious what seems to be the norm for timing with these Gen2 LT's and pretty much only find LS info when searching. I Know each car is a little different. I am only running 26* right now and working my way up.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2021 | 02:53 PM
  #2  
Catmaigne's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 25
From: Conshohocken, PA
Default

26 is definitely low, the LS heads have very efficient chambers and don't need nearly as much timing. What are the heads, CR, and octane? You're probably going to want something in the mid 30's @ WOT. I was running 34-35 (logged) with my AFR's. Ported stockies will want a few degrees more.

If you look around on Karl Ellwein's site, you can sometimes find the timing printed on the engine dyno sheet.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 05:47 AM
  #3  
Germansheperd1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 109
Likes: 18
From: Ohio
Default

Ive never messed with ignition timing on an LT1 (only Ford’s) but I would have to imagine that 26 isn’t to far off from stock? I’d probably start at 30 and go up NA.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 10:46 AM
  #4  
nickp's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 412
Likes: 21
From: Southern Michigan
Default

The motor is a 12:1 static comp. 383 with ported stock heads and intake and XFI 468 running 93 pump fuel. I apreciate the replies.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 11:21 AM
  #5  
Germansheperd1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 109
Likes: 18
From: Ohio
Default

I guess what fuel are you using? 93 Pump gas, a race fuel mix, or straight race fuel?
I have a NA 323 3V Mustang I run 30* with Shell V-Power 93, 33* with a 50-50 mix of Shell and MS-109, and I have run 36* with straight MS-109.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 12:08 PM
  #6  
Catmaigne's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 25
From: Conshohocken, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Germansheperd1
Ive never messed with ignition timing on an LT1 (only Ford’s) but I would have to imagine that 26 isn’t to far off from stock? I’d probably start at 30 and go up NA.
Stock LT1 timing is 33 in the table + 4 or 5 degrees from the PE adder, so 37 or 38 total. Like I said, shoot for mid 30's.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 02:33 PM
  #7  
Germansheperd1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 109
Likes: 18
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Catmaigne
Stock LT1 timing is 33 in the table + 4 or 5 degrees from the PE adder, so 37 or 38 total. Like I said, shoot for mid 30's.
Is that for an OBDI or OBDII or both? Thats way more than I was expecting.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2021 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
dirtybob's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 72
Likes: 11
Default

My car ran the best at 29 degrees total (B body). My opti may or may not have been clocked correctly (mystery cardone opti)
Kind of a PITA to flash the car between passes to find out what it liked...
The obd1 tunes do command a lot of advance, I wouldn't think the obd2 tunes are much different.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2021 | 12:10 AM
  #9  
Catmaigne's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 25
From: Conshohocken, PA
Default

All of the tunes I've looked at are OBD1, but I doubt they're different. The original 33+5 comes from a 94 TA, but I checked a 95 Z28 and 95 Vette and they're all the same. The B-body LT1 is a little different because of a different head/CR and it's meant to run on 87 octane, so it runs 29+5. I also have a LT4 tune that someone copied a bunch of tables to a OBD1 tune, and that runs 35+5. Unsure if OBD2 has the same +5 spark adder though.

To be honest, the only way to know what your motor really wants is to put it on a dyno and play with the timing until you hit peak torque. But mid 30's total is far from radical. Most mail order tunes run a few degrees over the stock tables.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2021 | 01:46 PM
  #10  
FrankieD's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 16
From: Richmond Hill, Ont, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Catmaigne
All of the tunes I've looked at are OBD1, but I doubt they're different. The original 33+5 comes from a 94 TA, but I checked a 95 Z28 and 95 Vette and they're all the same. The B-body LT1 is a little different because of a different head/CR and it's meant to run on 87 octane, so it runs 29+5. I also have a LT4 tune that someone copied a bunch of tables to a OBD1 tune, and that runs 35+5. Unsure if OBD2 has the same +5 spark adder though.

To be honest, the only way to know what your motor really wants is to put it on a dyno and play with the timing until you hit peak torque. But mid 30's total is far from radical. Most mail order tunes run a few degrees over the stock tables.
When datalogging will these (+ added degrees) show up in the final spark value or are they hidden?
Say for example above on the listed LT4 values of 35+5, will the datalog actually present a value of 40 or 35?

Reply
Old Mar 27, 2021 | 02:26 PM
  #11  
dirtybob's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 72
Likes: 11
Default

It will show up on the logger, the spark adder (EST system time lag) can be disabled if you prefer.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2021 | 03:47 PM
  #12  
Catmaigne's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 25
From: Conshohocken, PA
Default

The datalog will show whatever the timing is, ie 40 in that example. The pcm has some sort of routine that adds extra degrees of spark depending on rpm in PE mode, probably due to limitations in the slow 90's processor to keep up at high rpm. You can disable it if you use Steveo's EEX XDF and set the "Unknown Spark Adder" to 0 (factory setting is 5) so the datalogs and spark tables match up.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2021 | 08:00 PM
  #13  
FrankieD's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 16
From: Richmond Hill, Ont, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Catmaigne
The pcm has some sort of routine that adds extra degrees of spark depending on rpm in PE mode, probably due to limitations in the slow 90's processor to keep up at high rpm..
Can anyone verify if this also occurs on the 92-93 LT1 ECU ?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2021 | 11:07 PM
  #14  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 987
Likes: 172
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by FrankieD
Can anyone verify if this also occurs on the 92-93 LT1 ECU ?
PE or WOT timing advance adder goes clear back to CCC Q-Jets. The routines are in feedback carbs, TBI, LT1, black box vortecs and even LS stuff.

Its not because of slow processor speeds. Its there because a richer mixture can tolerate and requires more timing than a leaner mixture. You can be at full load and 14.7:1 air/fuel ratio and say 32° of timing. When the WOT or PE fuel enrichment hits and the air/fuel ratio drops into the 12s the engine will want 3-6° more timing. On heavy trucks and vans used for towing I have seen as much as 8° power enrichment spark added. My personal 11:1 383 sits at 24° at 100 kpa running at 14.1:1 air/fuel (stoichiometric for 10% Ethanol fuel) and I increase to 32° at 12.5:1 at WOT. Gives quite a torque bump. If you tried to run 32° of timing at 14.1:1 at full load the engine would knock the pistons apart or pound the rod bearings flat from detonation. I make peak power at 35° BTDC, but lose less than 3 hp at 32°. My MBT timing advance is therefore around 32°. I drop off 8-10 hp for each degree I retard less than 32°. Running high load at stoichiometric it gets spark knock retard around 26-27° timing. At 24° it is knock free. I programmed the PE TPS vs RPM table to bring on PE around 80 KPA. Its a very seamless transition vs stock where you open the throttle to 60% and the MAP is at atmospheric pressure and have a dead spot for 30% of the throttle before it finally enters PE at 90% throttle.

Last edited by Fast355; Mar 28, 2021 at 11:21 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2021 | 01:26 AM
  #15  
moehorsepower's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 17
From: Texas
Default Timing

Originally Posted by nickp
How much timing are you guys logging on a WOT pass? I am attempting to tune my 24X H/C/I project myself with HP Tuners. Just curious what seems to be the norm for timing with these Gen2 LT's and pretty much only find LS info when searching. I Know each car is a little different. I am only running 26* right now and working my way up.
don’t go by numbers, read your plugs
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.