LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Throttle body Size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2005, 12:27 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
edlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Throttle body Size?

I am looking at getting a new throttle body. what size should I get.
I have a 96 ws6 LT-1, with 3.73 gears, TSP rumbler exhaust, k&n filter and a few free mods. I will probably be pulling or gutting my cats soon. Mostlikely long tubes this summer sometime.

Now for my set up should I get the bbk 52mm or the 58mm? I plan to match up the intake manifold to it to complete the installation.

Would the 58mm be more for cars with high flow fuel injectors?

I plan to put nitrous on soon. I was planning on the 58mm. But like I said I am not sure.

Let me know what you guys think
Old 02-20-2005, 12:43 AM
  #2  
Teching In
 
Camaro97USAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Really... stock's good enough for bolt ons... if it were me, I'd hold off on the TB until after you go into the engine. If you really want a TB now, 52mm would be ok. If you're going to wait, the 58mm would be nice on a heads cam car.
Old 02-20-2005, 12:45 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
WhtLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chitown
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

None of the above! Ur nowhere near exceeding the flow range of the stock TB yet. Maybe u should look elsewhere for power. Cold air kit or something. You may see gains now with goin for a bigger TB but they will be minimal at most for ur current application, even if u are spraying the car
Old 02-20-2005, 12:53 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 52 mm is fine for a bolton car. A 58 mm is definately too big for what you have now.
Old 02-20-2005, 02:21 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
 
Rare96WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

With your bolt-on setup the stock TB is fine. Later if you do heads/cam or a power adder a 52mm will be sufficient. I also have a 96 WS6 and with 400rwhp, the 52mm is good. A 58mm did not make any more power when tested on tyhe dyno.

S
Old 02-20-2005, 03:13 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
 
regorih383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pasadena Tx,
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts


Default

go with the 58mm , I mean come one its a 350!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 02-20-2005, 02:37 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
edlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default why the 58

Originally Posted by regorih355
go with the 58mm , I mean come one its a 350!!!!!!!!!!!!

Everyone else says to got with the stock throttle body. Why should I go with a 58 mm?


Now for everyone else that reads this


If I do the 58mm even if that has no benifit now. will it hurt anything.

I plan to do an lt4 conversion kit in about a year.

Thanks
Old 02-20-2005, 02:40 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
edlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 58mm too big?

Originally Posted by METALBEAST
A 52 mm is fine for a bolton car. A 58 mm is definately too big for what you have now.
if I get the 58mm will that hinder my gains at all or just be the same as the gains obtained with the 52mm?

Thanks
Old 02-20-2005, 03:39 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by edlt1
if I get the 58mm will that hinder my gains at all or just be the same as the gains obtained with the 52mm?

Thanks
You will run into 3 problems if you get the 58 mm TB for your setup:

1. The opening on your intake manifold will only accomodate a 54 mm TB without having to port the intake.

2. The 52 mm TB will flow roughly 748 CFM and the 58 mm flows in the range of 1000 CFM. For a NA 350 CI displacement engine you will have to turn 10,000 RPMS to require 1000 CFM. You would need to be turning around 7400 RPMS

3. A large TB can cause some throttle response issues due to decreased port velocity down low.
Old 02-20-2005, 04:21 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
SAPPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Halfway back on the Highway to Hell...again!
Posts: 1,590
Received 263 Likes on 182 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Save the $350 and buy something worthwhile. A 48 mm is more than enough to sufficiently you up to 500hp. Get an airfoil to help the airflow a little, but a 52mm will be a waste of money for what you have right now. I got one just cause I got a awesome deal. Like I said, put the $$ to something else.
Old 02-20-2005, 04:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Third Gear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah 48mm is good for most everything, FWIW the Ram Jet 502 crate engine makes 502 HP with the same 48mm TB
Old 02-20-2005, 06:11 PM
  #12  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
edlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Throttle response

Originally Posted by METALBEAST
You will run into 3 problems if you get the 58 mm TB for your setup:

1. The opening on your intake manifold will only accomodate a 54 mm TB without having to port the intake.

2. The 52 mm TB will flow roughly 748 CFM and the 58 mm flows in the range of 1000 CFM. For a NA 350 CI displacement engine you will have to turn 10,000 RPMS to require 1000 CFM. You would need to be turning around 7400 RPMS

3. A large TB can cause some throttle response issues due to decreased port velocity down low.



I plan to port it to 58mm.

Now as far as throttle response. This may accually make it less responsive?

would it be worth more for me to get an aftermarket MAF sensor. Or will that do the same give me to much air flow?



Thanks

Ed
Old 02-20-2005, 06:19 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
Camaro97USAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock MAF is good. Aftermarket MAF's can cause some issues too. 58mm is too much airflow for a bolt on car... Put the money towards the headers, or something.
Old 02-20-2005, 08:30 PM
  #14  
Launching!
 
my94blackz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cana, VA
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I made 365 NA with the stock tb and 364 with a bbk 52mm
Old 02-20-2005, 10:52 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
buffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NavySS
Yeah 48mm is good for most everything, FWIW the Ram Jet 502 crate engine makes 502 HP with the same 48mm TB

It has a 48mm TB because GM makes 48mm TBs. It was an off-the-shelf part

I would be willing to bet that 502 would make considerably more hp w/ a larger TB.

Matt
Old 02-20-2005, 11:09 PM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
Pegleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Damascus, MD
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would stay with 52 mm. They are expensive and if your not gaining anything. Its not worth it
Old 02-21-2005, 12:20 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
buffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey edlt1 whereabouts are you from in MI.

There was an article long ago, that was a great write up on intake pulse tuning. it says that as long as the velocity of the air through the throttle body is less than 180fps, then the pulses from the intake ports can get out through the TB, in effect creating a much larger intake plenum. This makes for more torque until the critical velocity is reached.

If you calculate the intake velocity through the stock throttle body using David Vizard's (the guy that wrote the article) equations, it reaches critical velocity at 4800rpm, which is perfect for a stock LT1 engine. The 58mm TB maxes out at around 6500 rpm on a 350, which, again, is just about right for a built engine. 52mm TB would be good IMO
Old 02-21-2005, 11:23 AM
  #18  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
edlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default thanks

Originally Posted by buffman
Hey edlt1 whereabouts are you from in MI.

There was an article long ago, that was a great write up on intake pulse tuning. it says that as long as the velocity of the air through the throttle body is less than 180fps, then the pulses from the intake ports can get out through the TB, in effect creating a much larger intake plenum. This makes for more torque until the critical velocity is reached.

If you calculate the intake velocity through the stock throttle body using David Vizard's (the guy that wrote the article) equations, it reaches critical velocity at 4800rpm, which is perfect for a stock LT1 engine. The 58mm TB maxes out at around 6500 rpm on a 350, which, again, is just about right for a built engine. 52mm TB would be good IMO
So if I do change it out I should use the 52mm.


Now what about when I use nitrous will the 52 or the 58 be better?


Thanks

Ed



Quick Reply: Throttle body Size?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.