DYNO results are in !! I'm happy :)
#42
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: STL area
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
It doesn't hold the LT1 cam only dyno record.
And why would the A/F chance from the collector to tail pipe, it's not like the exhaust gas majically changes in 10 feet of piping.
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
Post up the SAE #'s then you can start talking about that.
![Gay!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_rainbow.gif)
#44
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by KVU
Prove it.
Not because of the tail pipe length. I already said it's from the dynamic piston speed.
The dyno sheet has the correction factor right on it. We live about 600 ft above sea level AND the DA has been fair. So the correction factor is not that great. In fact, we will have negative DA soon and the dyno will pull hp on the correction factor). Even though the engine will be making over 100+ of it's available HP@ atmospheric pressure.
Not because of the tail pipe length. I already said it's from the dynamic piston speed.
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
The dyno sheet has the correction factor right on it. We live about 600 ft above sea level AND the DA has been fair. So the correction factor is not that great. In fact, we will have negative DA soon and the dyno will pull hp on the correction factor). Even though the engine will be making over 100+ of it's available HP@ atmospheric pressure.
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
#45
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do not understand why some people get thier panties in a wad over someone not posting SAE vs STD or vice versa. Honestly, who cares!!?? Not I. It's a matter of like 5-15hp.
And I could care less if you have a hard time believing what the car did on the dyno. It did what it did and that is all there is to it. I'm not here to prove anything.
Bottom line, its a strong running LT1 whether you like it or not.
Its strong running for 2 reasons.
1) The tuning ( Thanks Tim aka Total ReCal)
2) The installation (Thanks Redline Performance www.redline-fbody.com )
Nuff said.
And I could care less if you have a hard time believing what the car did on the dyno. It did what it did and that is all there is to it. I'm not here to prove anything.
Bottom line, its a strong running LT1 whether you like it or not.
Its strong running for 2 reasons.
1) The tuning ( Thanks Tim aka Total ReCal)
2) The installation (Thanks Redline Performance www.redline-fbody.com )
Nuff said.
#46
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SC
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
SO, it could have really pushed the CAM only numbers to 390 OR 360 (more on avg).
Just pointing it out, I dont care, I think it is a good number, now let's see you use that power, you want tips PM me.
Just pointing it out, I dont care, I think it is a good number, now let's see you use that power, you want tips PM me.
Originally Posted by ShadyPhi
I do not understand why some people get thier panties in a wad over someone not posting SAE vs STD or vice versa. Honestly, who cares!!?? Not I. It's a matter of like 5-15hp.