slave travel
Or something else ?
Something I always meant to measure was slave travel, never did get around to it though
When I did my clutch measurements, I cracked the bleeder and fully compressed the slave and got that measurement back to the trans/bell mating surface.
Other was clutch fingers to trans/bell mating surface.
Fully compressed slave measurement was .105 less than clutch finger measurement. If I didn't compress the slave, I got negative numbers like you're describing.
So, 2.5-3mm Slave free play based on that measurement. Slave max travel is 13mm. Fully disengaged on my clutch was 11mm best I could tell from measuring at wonky angles.
So figure 8mm travel needed to disengage tge clutch plus the free play.
All that to say - did you absolutely fully compress the slave when you measured?
if you have a TOB hydraulic, then I think you can change the size of the TOB to adjust distance. In both cases I would think, differing TOB thickness by .3" sounds like alot though. Almost sounds like the clutch master isn't full resetting back to zero.
you are on the right track, do not let the TOB ride the pressure plate or it won't last nearly as long, do whatever it takes to fix.
Have I seen someone else mention the rear flange on some cranks might be different ? ( not in terms of bolt holes, but actual flange depth ? )
Exactly which trans and bellhousing, I think some bellhousings were a different depth ? ie those on later cars that had a proper bearing for a spigot bearing vs older cars that used the needle roller deeper in the crank ?
Potentially their slave could be taller ?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time





