Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

gt 500 barley beats camaro ss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2009, 01:15 PM
  #101  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Gaunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: anozirA
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Holy **** this thread is dumb. 12.8 spinning the tires is not unexpected for a gt500. Definitely an apples to oranges comparison.
Old 07-10-2009, 01:32 PM
  #102  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i cant believe this thread is still going on.... PHYSICS PEOPLE!!! The more power u make the more tire u need. They both come out with the same size tire and one has 120 more hp. What do u expect the launch to look like?
Old 07-10-2009, 02:54 PM
  #103  
TECH Regular
 
lovescamaros28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bottom line is...it was not an *** whoopin(.1) but the faster car did win.
Old 07-10-2009, 03:07 PM
  #104  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
deelong4002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockbridge, MI
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Again, not impressed with the GT500.
Old 07-10-2009, 04:55 PM
  #105  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The gt500 won, end of story. On top of that, the gt500 is trapping over 5mph higher...

That being said, the gt500 isn't in the same league as the SS and the SS was not designed to compete with it. The SS starts at $30k, the GT500 at $47k.

Which would I buy? Neither, they're both fat as all hell. The GT500 weighs 3900lbs and the SS weighs 3800lbs. You could get a pretty powerful sedan that weighs in around that much and that would make a better DD. Atleast the GT500 has an optional GPS, but the live axle can't be too comfortable...

Screw them both, I'd rather have a C6 (or even a C5).

Last edited by DiscerningZ32; 07-10-2009 at 05:12 PM.
Old 07-11-2009, 01:43 AM
  #106  
Teching In
 
40ROLL?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ATX
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.1 of a second and 5mph for an extra 20k....no thanks.
Old 07-11-2009, 05:36 AM
  #107  
JJT
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
JJT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bones Z28
HAHAHA they say "you get what you pay for?" How is that? You can get a car that's literally 1 second faster in the 1320 for another 30 grand, that's lame as hell. I rather stick 10k in the SS and blow the **** out of that Cobra. That's just pathetic I'm sorry, when will ford ever learn. It's come to this I guess, considering the vette destroyed the cobra in every way, now they put it up against the SS lol.


Yea, Yea...what he say...FORD...SUCKS...
Old 07-11-2009, 02:45 PM
  #108  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
brandon janeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

wow that just made the gt500 look bad to be up 100+ hp and only go 1/10 faster
Old 07-11-2009, 04:15 PM
  #109  
On The Tree
 
Gottahavels1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 147
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'd like to see the supercharged z28 against the gt500!
Old 07-11-2009, 04:57 PM
  #110  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
witry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa/Valrico, FL/ Chicago, IL
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ok to me thats not a fair race the GT500 is almost 15K more and 114HP more and orcourse the GT500 will pull uptop its SUPERCHARGED but hell for 1/10 slower and 15K less the camaro is the bang for the buck but here is something to be proud of the Z06 completely demolishes the GT500

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIPBP-9TUnQ
Old 07-11-2009, 08:24 PM
  #111  
TECH Regular
 
lovescamaros28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blakbird24
From what i've found, there is about a 100lb difference between the two cars. Also, I can see what you are trying to say, but the fact is that the 2010 GT500's are just not dynoing that high. They are not dynoing low, just not astronomically high like the KR's.
100lb difference? pretty close...The M6 GT500 is rated at 3924lbs and the M6 Camaro SS is 3849lbs and the auto is 3902lbs.

Last edited by lovescamaros28; 07-11-2009 at 08:32 PM.
Old 07-12-2009, 02:37 PM
  #112  
Staging Lane
 
ChevySPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Out West
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by franksaltz28
I love how the title in your thread mispelled "Barely"

Old 07-12-2009, 03:48 PM
  #113  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
miller456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i didnt read the entire **** storm here but holy god did you see the wheel hop on the gt500 doing the burnout in the beginning?
Old 07-12-2009, 04:31 PM
  #114  
Launching!
iTrader: (16)
 
tkimrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hmmm...yeah I would be pissed if my car had over 500 hp and ran upper 12's. FWIW my car ran 11.90's with 360 to the ground...
Old 07-12-2009, 05:59 PM
  #115  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: COLUMBUS GA.
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ummm.. look at 1:54-58 it looks like he miss a gear or fudge somthing. The gt500 was not spinning and the way the ss pulled on the gt5 in second but falls on its face in third thats bull ****. Im not sayin the ss should have won but these stupid pro testers and the media constrew ****. 540 hp gt5 should be in the low 11's with tires the ss should be high 11's with good tires. This bullshit street testing is gay you want me to buy any one of those cars test them for real. Top end real 1/4 standing mile ect.
Old 07-12-2009, 09:46 PM
  #116  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

yeah camaro can can not shift for ****!
Old 07-13-2009, 08:40 AM
  #117  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Considering the monkeys at MT can't drive I'm not surprised it looked 'close'... Anytime you can be ahead of another car and then have that car pass you and put distance on you it's called an *** beating. At least where I am from.
Old 07-13-2009, 10:01 AM
  #118  
TECH Regular
 
DCsLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIPBP-9TUnQ&NR=1

thats a more fair match up
Old 07-13-2009, 11:36 AM
  #119  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
transaman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gardner, KS
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

took the words right out of my mouth. Assuming the price tags the said were correct the KR comes in at $151.85/hp, and the Z06 comes in at $150.49/hp, a pretty comparable match to say the least. I am happy to see the Z06 come out on top but I almost wish ford/shelby would have shaved a little weight to keep things a little more interesting.
Old 07-13-2009, 03:42 PM
  #120  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
hotrodscrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas/Somewhere in Southwest Asia
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ha ha, 580 bucks extra a foot. Rather have the SS, IMO of course!

-SS


Quick Reply: gt 500 barley beats camaro ss



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.