Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Top Gear Bugatti Veyron!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2007, 01:56 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Top Gear Bugatti Veyron!!!!!

Screw you guys if it's a repost!


O.............M..............G!!!!!!!!


http://www.fquick.com/videos/Clarkso...ti_Veyron/3770
Old 11-27-2007, 03:24 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
BlueBird346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oxford, AL
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah who cares if its a repost.
Old 11-27-2007, 04:11 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I didn't have any audio on this vid... but ASSY VID!!! Look at that fricking crankshaft!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCVZCykmpzk

In German.. But a 3D view of an operating engine! OMFG!!!!! UN FKN REAL!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJTQVirrLn4






Old 11-27-2007, 04:41 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

ahhhh yes a repost but a good one. My all time favorite car.

sleek, sexy, original and unique. sure the Ultiamte aero may be fast but a v8TT is ancient technology.

A W16 quad turbo engine and a chassis thats 4200 that can out handel a lotus elise is something so much more
Old 11-27-2007, 08:41 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ehh, the handling aspect is very interesting, but 16 cylinders with 4 turbos and only 1000 horsepower, come on now thats just to much displacement and to many turbos to not be some where around 2000 hp. I call underachieving, as far as the engine goes ofcourse
Old 11-27-2007, 08:55 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

repost

















Old 11-27-2007, 09:20 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tis ugly though.

W
Old 11-27-2007, 09:30 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by plaf713
ehh, the handling aspect is very interesting, but 16 cylinders with 4 turbos and only 1000 horsepower, come on now thats just to much displacement and to many turbos to not be some where around 2000 hp. I call underachieving, as far as the engine goes ofcourse
Ummm, how many 1000hp cars do you know of that are 100% street legal, drive like a daily driver, do 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, and will last as long as or longer than any factory car out there? Underachieving, I think not. You have the wrong goal in mind if you think their goal was to build the highest hp racing car in the world.
Old 11-28-2007, 03:53 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Spoolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plaf713
ehh, the handling aspect is very interesting, but 16 cylinders with 4 turbos and only 1000 horsepower, come on now thats just to much displacement and to many turbos to not be some where around 2000 hp. I call underachieving, as far as the engine goes ofcourse
It's not HUGE displacement numbers. I think it's 8liters. And from what I read somewhere the engine itself can produce 3000 hp but with all the losses in drivetrain, cooling (10 intercoolers), adiabatic efficiencies, etc...that number comes out as 1000rwhp.
Not sure how's that's not impressive but whatever.
Old 12-02-2007, 11:04 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Another one!! 0-253mph!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIfWPXGnj2o


I am in such awe of this car!!!! Not a smiley in the world can say what I feel!!!!11 THis is beyond nipple hardening goose bumps..

Last edited by bayer-z28; 12-02-2007 at 11:10 PM.
Old 12-02-2007, 11:11 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
MOLESTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kantucky
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
It's not HUGE displacement numbers. I think it's 8liters. And from what I read somewhere the engine itself can produce 3000 hp but with all the losses in drivetrain, cooling (10 intercoolers), adiabatic efficiencies, etc...that number comes out as 1000rwhp.
Not sure how's that's not impressive but whatever.
i think you meant to say it has 10 radiators, not intercoolers
Old 12-02-2007, 11:21 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
SSNISTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
a chassis thats 4200 that can out handel a lotus elise is something so much more
LOL, are you serious? The Bug doesn't handle anywhere near as good as a Elise or any supercar for that matter. No matter how good it might be it is a fat 4200 pound pig. It isn't tossable. Psyhics can tell you that.

If you ask me it's heavy weight isn't it's problem, it's the fact that it is UGLY is.
Old 12-03-2007, 02:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1000 hp is not impressive im sorry. 8 litres is pretty big and 4 turbos sounds like overkill, think about it 4 turbos. I know there goal wasnt to make the most hp but im sure they could have done it with two turbos. My point is that they make 1000 hp on this very extravagant motor but here in america we make twin turbo big blocks that make more power. I just think that the motor itself is very unimpressive.
Old 12-03-2007, 02:17 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PewterScreaminMach
Ummm, how many 1000hp cars do you know of that are 100% street legal, drive like a daily driver, do 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, and will last as long as or longer than any factory car out there? Underachieving, I think not. You have the wrong goal in mind if you think their goal was to build the highest hp racing car in the world.
and to quote you the 2002 lingenfelter vette goes 0-60 in under two seconds (1.97) to be exact, and thats with less displacement and two turbos, so impressive, i think not. Now mind you i am only reffering to the engine
Old 12-03-2007, 03:50 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
 
XxGarbSxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blackwood, NJ
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the point of using the 4 turbos on the Veyron was to increase driveability. Yea, you can get more power with less turbos, but you lose a certain level of driveability when you get to certain power numbers that have to be oh-so-high in the rpm range of the engine.

And not to dis the Bugatti or anything, but didn't the Cadillac 16 make 1000hp n/a? Yea, it was just a concept to show off DOD, but I remember reading that it made1000hp. And the size of the engine made for a really nice and long hood, too. Long hood usually = sexy car.
Old 12-03-2007, 07:25 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

4 turbos, now think of it this way guys.

each tubo runs 3 psi thats only 12 psi on that motor.

Low boost= fast spooling, no turbo lag. Ntice it enver takes ny amount of time to get it moving? its an engineering mavel especially to make a 4200lb car handel the way it does and make such an intricate engine function on a day to day basis for many years to come.

Also lets keep in mind this car runs on PUMP GAS and passes ALL emissions, including the very strict ones overseas.

Last edited by Tainted; 12-03-2007 at 07:37 PM.
Old 12-03-2007, 07:40 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

they could have also done like porsche turbo's and done variable vain technology

hehe i love porsche
Old 12-03-2007, 07:43 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Spoolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
4 turbos, now think of it this way guys.

each tubo runs 3 psi thats only 12 psi on that motor.

Low boost= fast spooling, no turbo lag. Ntice it enver takes ny amount of time to get it moving? its an engineering mavel especially to make a 4200lb car handel the way it does and make such an intricate engine function on a day to day basis for many years to come.
I think your wasting your breath on some of these guys bro! There's reasons why this drive train has won award after award as an engineering marvel and been recognized as a tremendous feat in engineering.
There's also a reason why they didn't throw in a twin turbo LSX block pushing 18 psi. Reliability, driveability, flexability, etc...
As all things in this world it's not for everyone. Only way to impress them would be to turn the boost up until you start finding weak links in the drive train. wonder what 20 psi on thing would look like.
Old 12-03-2007, 08:25 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well they are building the Veyron GT which is rumoed to be lighter, and packing over 1200 hp


Video of the car HANDLEING
http://youtube.com/watch?v=aZ_tuwoASs0&feature=related

Fitfth Gears Review:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YFvQK39sUyg&feature=related
Old 12-03-2007, 08:50 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
I think your wasting your breath on some of these guys bro! There's reasons why this drive train has won award after award as an engineering marvel and been recognized as a tremendous feat in engineering.
There's also a reason why they didn't throw in a twin turbo LSX block pushing 18 psi. Reliability, driveability, flexability, etc...
As all things in this world it's not for everyone. Only way to impress them would be to turn the boost up until you start finding weak links in the drive train. wonder what 20 psi on thing would look like.
well first off you can throw everything that you have said out the window when you look at the price tag and realize that 250 miles an hour really isnt worth that much. What they go for 1.5 mil, ill buy a house, put three kids through colleges, buy a twin turbo lsx running 20 psi and have a lot left over. So they can win there awards but it really doesnt mean much if its not practical.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.