New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why are the f bodies so much heavier than the vettes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2011, 06:13 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LS_Dreamin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default why are the f bodies so much heavier than the vettes?

Hey yall I'm new to the forum and was wondering wht makes the f bodies so muchg heavier than the c5? And wht can you do to lighten them cheap. Also would you recomend an fbody over a c5. I want the most bang for the buck but I want the best I can get though too. Please give me all your opinions. Thanks!!!
Old 12-05-2011, 06:28 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
LS-ONE_DAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Corvette's are built of lighter weight materials overall. Aluminum, magnesium, etc.

Corvette's are great in a straight line and handle great, big difference between them and an f-body. Vette's are sports cars, f-body's are more straight muscle.

To lighten an F-body you can remove the rear seats, delete EGR/AIR/AC, get aftermarket suspension and other parts, for example a tubular k-member can save up to 70 pounds I believe.

A C5 will cost you at least $10,000 (for a beat on / heavily used one). I got my '99 Formula of which only 1,420 were made back in July with only 21,450 miles on it for $9,300
Old 12-05-2011, 06:45 PM
  #3  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Mattsv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: grove city oh
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Vette fiberglass and plastic. Hydroformed frame 2 seater. F body part plastic part glass steel rear 4 seats steel regular unibody chassis.
F body for straight line vette corners
Old 12-05-2011, 07:02 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

vettes last i knew i have fiberglass and CF body panels.
Old 12-05-2011, 07:39 PM
  #5  
Launching!
 
Reaperchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quoting Jacka$$ Borat :

Both car's are "Pu$$y Magnets"
Unfortunately f body's may attract more Obese chicks haha
Old 12-05-2011, 07:41 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Reaperchild
Quoting Jacka$$ Borat :

Both car's are "Pu$$y Magnets"
Unfortunately f body's may attract more Obese chicks haha
F stands for fat.


but its probably because they cant fit in vettes.
Old 12-05-2011, 07:48 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (66)
 
supersick99z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
F stands for fat.


but its probably because they cant fit in vettes.
It's not that the fat girl can't fit, but with every fat ugly girl comes her best friend who's hot and skinny so she has no where to sit haha
Old 12-05-2011, 07:57 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
vettes last i knew i have fiberglass and CF body panels.
I don't think carbon fiber was used on Corvettes until the C6's. But the C5's were basically 100% fiberglass.

And to the OP although there lighter there really not that much lighter. If I remember right corvettes weight around 3200 and most F bodies weight between 3400-3600.
Old 12-06-2011, 05:10 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
CaptainCrunch42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Starz T/A 17
I don't think carbon fiber was used on Corvettes until the C6's. But the C5's were basically 100% fiberglass.

And to the OP although there lighter there really not that much lighter. If I remember right corvettes weight around 3200 and most F bodies weight between 3400-3600.
Fact - I own both, and here are the weights with full tank of gas and no people inside..and note one is a heavier convertible:

C5 coupe - 3260
SS vert - 3640
Old 12-06-2011, 05:33 AM
  #10  
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
BOBS99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Elyria Ohio
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

if your looking to get the best bang for the buck i vote c5zo6, you can get them at a decent price , and there is alot there to start with, also you cant compare a vette to a f body, vette is just so much more car,and overal better imo
Old 12-06-2011, 05:42 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
blk/slvr02ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Port Saint Lucie,Florida
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No not really my 02 Camaro SS w/ Weld Pro Stars and just no front Pass Seat weight was 3265 and my 2008 Vette w/ GTO Spares & 17x9.5 rears weight was 3135 so thats not a big difference !
Old 12-06-2011, 07:10 AM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS-ONE_DAY
Corvette's are built of lighter weight materials overall. Aluminum, magnesium, etc.

Corvette's are great in a straight line and handle great, big difference between them and an f-body. Vette's are sports cars, f-body's are more straight muscle.

To lighten an F-body you can remove the rear seats, delete EGR/AIR/AC, get aftermarket suspension and other parts, for example a tubular k-member can save up to 70 pounds I believe.

A C5 will cost you at least $10,000 (for a beat on / heavily used one). I got my '99 Formula of which only 1,420 were made back in July with only 21,450 miles on it for $9,300
A stock LS1 K-member with engine stands weighs approx 58lbs. My new MWC k-member in mild steel weighs in at 22lbs with engine stands. Don't know how you came up with 70lbs weight savings lol but realistically a k-member will save 25-35ish+ lbs, still a good chunk though.
Old 12-06-2011, 08:23 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
udienow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Best bang for the buck? No question u gotte go with f-body... i dont know how anyone can suggest the vette.
Old 12-06-2011, 08:40 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
blk/slvr02ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Port Saint Lucie,Florida
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would buy a 2002 Z-28 A4 w/ around 50,000 on it and do full bolt-on's and go from there !!!!!!! Weight reduction is easy on them but depends how far u want to go !!!
Old 12-06-2011, 10:04 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
LS-ONE_DAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by djfury05
A stock LS1 K-member with engine stands weighs approx 58lbs. My new MWC k-member in mild steel weighs in at 22lbs with engine stands. Don't know how you came up with 70lbs weight savings lol but realistically a k-member will save 25-35ish+ lbs, still a good chunk though.
Haha oops. I got that from a guy who has a 98 Z28 drag car. I must have heard him wrong, he probably said a tubular K-member helped him save 70 pounds in the front including other lighter aftermarket parts and I just didn't remember that

Bang for the buck though, F-body. A bolt on A4 with tires, converter and nitrous (best bang for the buck go fast mod) = straight line monster
Old 12-06-2011, 10:40 AM
  #16  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,251
Likes: 0
Received 1,685 Likes on 1,207 Posts

Default

F-bodies aren't "so much heavier" at all. Curb weight for a 2002 Corvette is 3214lbs, and curb weight for a 2002 V8 Camaro is 3410lbs. An extra 200lbs isn't much when you consider the extra steel found in an F-body vs the C5, and also the fact that the F-body is an overall larger car. Here are the exterior dementions of both:

2002 Corvette Coupe:
L: 179.7"
W: 73.6"
H: 47.7"

2002 Camaro Coupe:
L: 193.5"
W: 74.1"
H: 51.2"

Originally Posted by BOBS99SS
if your looking to get the best bang for the buck i vote c5zo6, you can get them at a decent price , and there is alot there to start with, also you cant compare a vette to a f body, vette is just so much more car,and overal better imo
The Corvette is not a better overall car for every purpose. If you need a back seat, then the F-body would be better. If you want to build a drag car, then the F-body would be a better platform. It all depends on your priorities and purpose. In many cases, the Corvette is superior, but that's also why you're paying more for it; you're not getting any advantages for free with the Corvette.
Old 12-06-2011, 12:45 PM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
BStowers023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulfport, MS / Columbus, OH
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fbodies aren't as heavy as people like to think....and weight can be cut a lot easier/cheaper in an Fbody than a C5. As far as straight line performance potential for the price, the Fbody by a longshot. I love C5s but can't justify paying an extra $5k+ to have something equally as fast than costs more to mod.
Old 12-06-2011, 12:55 PM
  #18  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnS Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Simple...you get what you pay for.
Old 12-07-2011, 03:54 PM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LS_Dreamin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BStowers023
Fbodies aren't as heavy as people like to think....and weight can be cut a lot easier/cheaper in an Fbody than a C5. As far as straight line performance potential for the price, the Fbody by a longshot. I love C5s but can't justify paying an extra $5k+ to have something equally as fast than costs more to mod.
Would you recomend a 02 firehawk or just go with a c5?
Old 12-07-2011, 04:41 PM
  #20  
Staging Lane
 
jamal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is a bolt on ls1 fbody about the same as a c5z06 in performance?


Quick Reply: why are the f bodies so much heavier than the vettes?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.