Rev limiter...
#5
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,017
Likes: 0
Received 1,464 Likes
on
1,056 Posts
I would not raise the rev limiter on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I would not raise the rev limiter on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
Trending Topics
#8
11 Second Club
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I would not raise the rev limiter on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
No point in playing with fire on a stock LS1. You're money would be much better spent on a 3400-3800 stall torque converter and a transmission cooler
#11
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,017
Likes: 0
Received 1,464 Likes
on
1,056 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordon0652
ok, thank you, then i wont do it before mods.
Leave the rev limiter at the stock setting until you get some aftermarket valvesprings.
#12
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Good choice.
Leave the rev limiter at the stock setting until you get some aftermarket valvesprings.
Leave the rev limiter at the stock setting until you get some aftermarket valvesprings.
#13
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I would not raise the rev limiter on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
1) There is very little (if any) to be gained by doing so.
2) The stock valvesprings aren't very good above 6200rpm (which is what the stock limiter is set for).
Not worth risking the damage. Your money would be much better spent buying some simple bolt-ons first rather than worring about tuning changes on a stock motor.
Your power band is arround 5800 rpms anyways I think on a stocker. No point in ******* with it imo!
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordon0652
ok, thank you, then i wont do it before mods.