Nitrous controller: Would it make sense??
From my understanding it is foremost the shock of sudden increase in cylinder pressure when nitrous is engaged that takes a toll on the engine. Is that correct?
And could I decrease that shock by wiring in a nitrous controller for gradual engagement?
Would that make sense, or would it be a waste of money?
Currently I run a 100 shot wet with WOT switch, window switch and FPSS. I am a bit nervous about going any higher, but I would like to run a 150 shot if I can pull it off without major destruction down the road.
Matt
Gradual engagement is definitely a good thing.
In order to answer your question I have to go a bit into the fundimentals.
One problem with nitrous is it's a constant horsepower device. If you jet it for 100hp, it will make 100hp regardless of what RPM you use it at. Cylinder pressure is what causes detonation, and is also what causes load on the rings and bearings. Cylinder pressure is roughly proportional to torque. In theory it is proportional to torque, there's engine drag, timing, and fueling play a role which is why I'm saying "roughly".
Since torque = RPM * HP / 5252, a device that makes constant horsepower regardless of RPM inherantly makes torque as an inverse relationship to RPM. So 100HP is 175 ft/lbs @ 3000, 131 ft/lbs @ 4000, 105 ft/lbs @ 5000, and only 87 ft/lbs @ 6000. The bottom line here is a 100hp shot of nitrous is more torque / cylinder pressure (and therefore more "bad" for the motor) the lower the RPM you go. This is why the rule of thumb not to spray below 3000.
With that groundwork laid I can answer your question.
Different nitrous controllers operate with different goals. Most nitrous controllers adjust nitrous flow over time. The goal of these controllers is to limit nitrous flow at low vehicle speed, to help with traction. For example, a car with an automatic transmission, with a controller tuned to help keep traction would be a formidable opponent on the street. Some nitrous controllers however (the NX maximizer and maximizer II) control nitrous flow based on engine RPM rather than time. This is useful if your biggest concern is protecting the engine, rather than traction.
> Would that make sense, or would it be a waste of money?
The 2nd type of nitrous controller I mentioned is a very good use of money, if your goal is to protect your engine. Those controllers also have the ability to cut off the nitrous flow if your o2 sensor shows you going lean, which is also good protection. They will also cut off nitrous before your rev limiter, though you dont need a nitrous controller for that, a simple window switch will do.
> Currently I run a 100 shot wet with WOT switch, window switch and FPSS. I am a bit nervous about going any higher, but I would like to run a 150 shot if I can pull it off without major destruction down the road.
There are never any guarantees when you modify your engine to make more power than the factory designed it for. That said, if you are safely running 100 shot now you can probably do 150 safely with an rpm based controller.
Steve
Now, a progressive controller controls the solenoids by pulsing them. Will the high frequency of on and off changes harm the solenoids?
Trending Topics
Matt
Now, a progressive controller controls the solenoids by pulsing them. Will the high frequency of on and off changes harm the solenoids?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Matt
Matt
I have a progressive setup in my car and it rocks the house. much more controllable for traction and reduces stress on the shortblock. highly recomended. A simple 2 stage can also help.
and yes I think it does make sence if you have a stock bottom end like me. Last edited by Oatmeal; Oct 6, 2006 at 02:35 PM.

