Talk about Stupid!
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Talk about Stupid!
Read this in the Olympia newspaper today.
http://www.theolympian.com/377/story/146237.html
EVERETT, Wash. — The Washington State Patrol says a trooper arrested two men speeding 141 mph on I-5 in Snohomish County.
The patrol says the trooper thought he was hearing an airplane early Sunday as the cars whizzed by going north - a 2005 BMW 330i with a 2007 Honda Accord right behind.
The trooper caught up with the cars because they had stopped for a passenger from one of the cars to get into the other.
The 22-year-old driver of the BMW, and the 18-year-old driver of the Honda were booked into the Snohomish County Jail for charges of reckless driving.
http://www.theolympian.com/377/story/146237.html
EVERETT, Wash. — The Washington State Patrol says a trooper arrested two men speeding 141 mph on I-5 in Snohomish County.
The patrol says the trooper thought he was hearing an airplane early Sunday as the cars whizzed by going north - a 2005 BMW 330i with a 2007 Honda Accord right behind.
The trooper caught up with the cars because they had stopped for a passenger from one of the cars to get into the other.
The 22-year-old driver of the BMW, and the 18-year-old driver of the Honda were booked into the Snohomish County Jail for charges of reckless driving.
#6
Originally Posted by Daredevil_TA
An.....thats why you don't race on I-5
The good part is they didn't kill anyone like what happened on 167 back in November (?). Stupid BMW kid killed a Mom with a young infant by road racing
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Addict
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder how fast that cop was going to catch up with them and if he was going with catching them in mind? Better to use Motorola next time.
And yes, 140+ on I-5 is stupid.
And yes, 140+ on I-5 is stupid.
#10
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lynnwood, WA (North of Seattle)
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by howierd42
I wonder how fast that cop was going to catch up with them and if he was going with catching them in mind? Better to use Motorola next time.
And yes, 140+ on I-5 is stupid.
And yes, 140+ on I-5 is stupid.
Not looking for a fight, just wondering what you mean by that. Maybe there is an angle I am missing here.
#11
TECH Addict
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since I did not see if the story said how far ahead it was that the police caught up with the speeding cars, there is no real way to determine how fast he had to go, but I am sure it was over the speed limit and less that 140 .
And by using Motorola, I did mean radio ahead. Perhaps it would be safer (for the officer, and the public) if there was another cop somewhere up the road, or even Guardian 1 (or 2, or 3 ...) over head. If not, then I agree, the trooper would have been derelict in his duties not to pursue.
I am just saying that if someone passes by you from a standing stop doing 140+ miles per hour and you give chase with the idea that you are going to catch up to them, you would have to be traveling at warp 8 to achieve that goal .
And by using Motorola, I did mean radio ahead. Perhaps it would be safer (for the officer, and the public) if there was another cop somewhere up the road, or even Guardian 1 (or 2, or 3 ...) over head. If not, then I agree, the trooper would have been derelict in his duties not to pursue.
I am just saying that if someone passes by you from a standing stop doing 140+ miles per hour and you give chase with the idea that you are going to catch up to them, you would have to be traveling at warp 8 to achieve that goal .
#12
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lynnwood, WA (North of Seattle)
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by howierd42
Since I did not see if the story said how far ahead it was that the police caught up with the speeding cars, there is no real way to determine how fast he had to go, but I am sure it was over the speed limit and less that 140 .
And by using Motorola, I did mean radio ahead. Perhaps it would be safer (for the officer, and the public) if there was another cop somewhere up the road, or even Guardian 1 (or 2, or 3 ...) over head. If not, then I agree, the trooper would have been derelict in his duties not to pursue.
I am just saying that if someone passes by you from a standing stop doing 140+ miles per hour and you give chase with the idea that you are going to catch up to them, you would have to be traveling at warp 8 to achieve that goal .
And by using Motorola, I did mean radio ahead. Perhaps it would be safer (for the officer, and the public) if there was another cop somewhere up the road, or even Guardian 1 (or 2, or 3 ...) over head. If not, then I agree, the trooper would have been derelict in his duties not to pursue.
I am just saying that if someone passes by you from a standing stop doing 140+ miles per hour and you give chase with the idea that you are going to catch up to them, you would have to be traveling at warp 8 to achieve that goal .
My "guess" is that the cop saw 2 cars screaming by, presumed they were racing and figured that they would slow down eventually, cuz unless they confiscate a Lambo or similar car, no one is catching up to them at 140+
And I am hoping he followed protocol and radioed ahead......just may have found them before anyone else got into position?
#14
What a bunch of idiots... not only for going 140+ on I-5 (That's just asking to kill yourself and someone else), but also for STOPPING after passing a cop! All I know is if I passed a cop at that speed, there's no way in hell I'm stopping until I take an off-ramp on to another highway, or turn down some side roads and backtrack my way back behind his position, etc.
That's the problem with going 140+ though... the people who do it aren't usually geniuses and don't think ahead enough.
That's the problem with going 140+ though... the people who do it aren't usually geniuses and don't think ahead enough.
#15
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's what komo had to say:
http://www.komotv.com/news/8190802.html
"The trooper clocked the BMW at 141 mph, Rudeen said. The Honda was behind the BMW and was keeping pace.
The trooper spotted both cars pulled over near the I-5 interchange with I-405. Rudeen said the cars stopped to let one of the BMW passengers ride in the Honda."
That still cracks me up!
http://www.komotv.com/news/8190802.html
"The trooper clocked the BMW at 141 mph, Rudeen said. The Honda was behind the BMW and was keeping pace.
The trooper spotted both cars pulled over near the I-5 interchange with I-405. Rudeen said the cars stopped to let one of the BMW passengers ride in the Honda."
That still cracks me up!
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
I dont see what the big deal is. The article makes it seem like 141mph is like warp speed or something. I am still usually asleep at 141mph and Jeff has to wake me up when we get over 160mph. The ride doesnt even get fun till your over 190mph and the BIG fun starts at 200mph.
141mph.....BOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNG GGG
141mph.....BOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNG GGG
#18
Originally Posted by NataSS Inc
I dont see what the big deal is. The article makes it seem like 141mph is like warp speed or something. I am still usually asleep at 141mph and Jeff has to wake me up when we get over 160mph. The ride doesnt even get fun till your over 190mph and the BIG fun starts at 200mph.
141mph.....BOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNG GGG
141mph.....BOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNG GGG
#20
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lynnwood, WA (North of Seattle)
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NVME
I seriously doubt the Accord was going 140 mph. Anything is possible I guess.
She had been drinking (not DUI) and claimed she got a call from her kid/babysitter and the kid was sick. So she needed to do 130 to get home and take care of her kid.....on a Friday night at 11:05.......after she had been drinking.........dumb bitch......BEEEEEEEEG fat ticket........not contested.