PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mail-Order Dyno Tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:12 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Mail-Order Dyno Tune

The usual question is mail-order OR dyno tune. Some shop should offer mail-order dyno tuning. What I have in mind is something like the following: The customer provides complete specifications of his engine; displacement, compression ratio, heads, cam, intake, injectors, etc. The shop's expert technicians quickly assemble that combination from a vast inventory of parts. The customer provides any unusual parts not in inventory or pays extra. The shop then tunes the duplicate combination on an engine dyno. They deliver to the customer a Katech-quality tune without the customer needing to write Katech a blank check. Does anyone offer anything like this service?
Old 02-05-2009, 08:29 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
edcmat-l1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

You do realize the cost of such a project, and it's lack of efficiency, right?

You're talking about a shop having an engine on the dyno, ready to make changes at request, with a variety of cams, heads, displacement, etc., all for a mail order tune, that usually sells for anywhere from 75 bucks to 250 bucks. In all reality, something like that would cost more than a full chassis dyno tune. Heck, just to put an engine on an engine dyno is usually 800 bucks plus.

BTW, what is a "Katech quality tune"?
Old 02-05-2009, 08:32 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
therealcreeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,404
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

doesn't seem cost-effective to have a shop build you an entire engine identical to the one you already have and then ship you the tune. they'd have to charge you a lot if they're going to keep all possible combinations of parts on hand and spend the time assembling it all.
Old 02-05-2009, 08:40 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Chevyguy358's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I hope this is a joke...
Old 02-05-2009, 08:46 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Golf&GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 948
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You would maybe get a slight step above a regular mail-order tune. They will be two different engines, they will not be exactly the same, no matter if they use the same parts or not. That's why everyone out there with the same 228 cam and the same stock 241 heads isn't making exactly 403 RWHP (just a random example I came up with).
Old 02-05-2009, 09:11 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
You do realize the cost of such a project, and it's lack of efficiency, rightt?
I do not know the cost. I expect it to be more expensive than a conventional dyno tune. Efficiency could come from the fact that many combinations are quite common and and would need only to be tuned once. A shop could specialize in NA 347s, for example. Much of this work has already been done.
Old 02-05-2009, 09:13 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (43)
 
poconojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
You do realize the cost of such a project, and it's lack of efficiency, right?

You're talking about a shop having an engine on the dyno, ready to make changes at request, with a variety of cams, heads, displacement, etc., all for a mail order tune, that usually sells for anywhere from 75 bucks to 250 bucks. In all reality, something like that would cost more than a full chassis dyno tune. Heck, just to put an engine on an engine dyno is usually 800 bucks plus.

BTW, what is a "Katech quality tune"?
I think he's talking about Katech the engine builders, they do LS1 work. I think they're in Michigin or somewhere around there
Old 02-05-2009, 09:18 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Golf&GM
You would maybe get a slight step above a regular mail-order tune. They will be two different engines, they will not be exactly the same, no matter if they use the same parts or not. That's why everyone out there with the same 228 cam and the same stock 241 heads isn't making exactly 403 RWHP (just a random example I came up with).
I doubt that this is true. The reason that nearly identical combinations produce substantially different rusults must certainly be that they are tuned differently.

Last edited by Gary Z; 02-05-2009 at 09:34 PM.
Old 02-05-2009, 09:57 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
therealcreeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,404
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i think it'd be cheaper to order a mail order tune to get it running, then drive it to the dyno to have it tuned
Old 02-05-2009, 10:15 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chevyguy358
I hope this is a joke...
Not intentionally. Here is an alternative idea. We already have an on-line repository of free, mostly amateur, downloadable tunes. Why can't someone take advantage of their engine development work and provide a library of high-quality professional tunes, downloadable for $500? Thunder Racing wouldn’t be giving away big secrets if they made available a tune for a 346 with stock heads, LS6 intake, longtubes and a TR224. They certainly have this information. Why don’t they sell it?

Last edited by Gary Z; 02-05-2009 at 10:25 PM.
Old 02-05-2009, 10:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
b00sted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,109
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't worry...everyone gets crazy ideas that sound really good after hitting the bong one too many times.
Old 02-06-2009, 07:58 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Golf&GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 948
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gary Z
I doubt that this is true. The reason that nearly identical combinations produce substantially different rusults must certainly be that they are tuned differently.
Even the same setup on different cars with the same tune at the same shop on the same dyno on the same day are not going to be exactly the same. I'm not saying they won't be close, I'm just saying the wear and build of the two engines will not be identical. Also the sensors might a read a little different, one engine might have more miles, one set of heads might flow better than the other, there are too many variables to make what this guy suggests in any way comparable to a real dyno tune. Better than a mail order, maybe, but it still won't be dead on.
Old 02-06-2009, 09:33 AM
  #13  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Golf&GM
Even the same setup on different cars with the same tune at the same shop on the same dyno on the same day are not going to be exactly the same. I'm not saying they won't be close, I'm just saying the wear and build of the two engines will not be identical. Also the sensors might a read a little different, one engine might have more miles, one set of heads might flow better than the other, there are too many variables to make what this guy suggests in any way comparable to a real dyno tune. Better than a mail order, maybe, but it still won't be dead on.
I 100% agree with this. It is what I tell all of our customers. If you do an engine dyno session, you end up with an engine dyno cal. If you do a chassis dyno session, you end up with a chassis dyno cal. If you have a loaded chassis dyno, you have an almost complete street cal. If you have 50 engineers working on seperate parts of the calibration, making each part work up to its max potential, you have an almost finished vehicle cal.

When you have run the car across the emission rolls with a final end calibrator, then and only then do you have a complete sellable calibration.

Then you ship the car to the dealer, sell the car and realize that some customers in Northern MN are complaing about cold starts, so you do a manditory cal change. Then, some other customers in Phoenix complain about something else and you make another manditory cal change.

Sorry for the long statement, but I think it gets the point across. To change your engine even 50hp over stock really requires a new calibration. Yes it will work, but it will not be 100%, more like 65%, and the more you add the worse it gets. So, get your parts, and go through the steps mentioned and it will be a GM quality tune!!!
Old 02-06-2009, 12:00 PM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary Z
I doubt that this is true. The reason that nearly identical combinations produce substantially different rusults must certainly be that they are tuned differently.
No.

I have done the same setups on many cars and get much variation. If you are into even basic physics, you understand that the slew of variables actually means that no two can be the same.
Old 02-06-2009, 01:31 PM
  #15  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
boysiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wichita,KS
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Amazon tuning has this for cobras. You pay like 175 dollars and get as many downloadable tunes as long as you own the car. Just tell them your specs and everything else and then they send it to you within 24 hours. You then just upload it to your hand held tuner and then it uploads it to your car pcm.
Old 02-06-2009, 02:09 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boysiner
Amazon tuning has this for cobras. You pay like 175 dollars and get as many downloadable tunes as long as you own the car. Just tell them your specs and everything else and then they send it to you within 24 hours. You then just upload it to your hand held tuner and then it uploads it to your car pcm.
It's about as accurate as the rest of the mail order tunes too.
Old 02-06-2009, 02:45 PM
  #17  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
edcmat-l1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by poconojoe
I think he's talking about Katech the engine builders, they do LS1 work. I think they're in Michigin or somewhere around there
I know who they are, it was just an odd comment.
Old 02-06-2009, 05:02 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ford are much easier to tune e-mail than GM. I can give you a file for your 500 hp cobra, and be within reason without issue.

What the major difference between GM and ford guys. GM engines are big, respond great to a heads/cam package, and run a SD/MAF based system. Fords are "MAF" based, some alpha N backup, but basically maf only, with the maf in an intake track, not located 2" from the throttle body.

GM guys run heads/cams are basic mods. They make great power, and require real tuning. Each setup is unique, with lots of head options, lots of cam options, lots of exhaust options, ect.

Ford guys run basic boltons, (intake, exhaust, pulleys, cai, ) and then go to forced induction. That's the most logical way to make power on a mustang. There are no "400 rwhp" cam only guy, and no "50+hp" cams on stock fords.Once you install an aftermarket forced induction setup on a car, you need real tuning. You can get close through mail order, with datalogging, and a wideband. Some ford tuning companies provide thier dealers with real starting points, forced induction value files, maf value files, injector value files (all based off of real flow data...) that make dialing in a combination much easier. GM guys are all based off of the starting point thier tuner has, the tuning companies provide software, (diablosport may be the only exception, i have never seen CMR in person for any gm applications)

Ryan
Old 02-06-2009, 05:03 PM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (43)
 
poconojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by edcmat-l1
I know who they are, it was just an odd comment.
So did I, but it wasn't any odder then the rest of the post
Old 02-06-2009, 05:20 PM
  #20  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
edcmat-l1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow
Ford are much easier to tune e-mail than GM. I can give you a file for your 500 hp cobra, and be within reason without issue.

What the major difference between GM and ford guys. GM engines are big, respond great to a heads/cam package, and run a SD/MAF based system. Fords are "MAF" based, some alpha N backup, but basically maf only, with the maf in an intake track, not located 2" from the throttle body.

GM guys run heads/cams are basic mods. They make great power, and require real tuning. Each setup is unique, with lots of head options, lots of cam options, lots of exhaust options, ect.

Ford guys run basic boltons, (intake, exhaust, pulleys, cai, ) and then go to forced induction. That's the most logical way to make power on a mustang. There are no "400 rwhp" cam only guy, and no "50+hp" cams on stock fords.Once you install an aftermarket forced induction setup on a car, you need real tuning. You can get close through mail order, with datalogging, and a wideband. Some ford tuning companies provide thier dealers with real starting points, forced induction value files, maf value files, injector value files (all based off of real flow data...) that make dialing in a combination much easier. GM guys are all based off of the starting point thier tuner has, the tuning companies provide software, (diablosport may be the only exception, i have never seen CMR in person for any gm applications)

Ryan
You are right in that Fords seem easier to tune, and more forgiving. Also seem to have less combos, but for the GMs, if you have a deep library of CORRECT VE tables, idle airflow tables, and MAF tables, it's not too hard to get real close with a mail order. I've done mail order tunes for cammed cars Fbodies, GTOs, Vettes, and most are reporting back real good driveability, very little issues, even some have stated that my mail order tunes have run better than "in person" tunes from other guys. Now, that may say a lot for MY tunes, or VERY LITTLE for the other guys LOL. Take it how you will.

I recently did an LT1 mail order for another shop. They loaded the tune, then called me and told me it would hardly run. He had to jack the MAF table up in the lower portion by like 80% to make it idle. Then it was idling at like 1800. I spent some time on the phone with them (I kept telling them it had to have a vacuum leak) and finally, after they found the problem (vacuum leak) he loaded my tune back in, and said it ran damn near perfect (cammed, LT4 heads, intake, etc.)

Moral of the story, when it comes to mail order tuning, you CANNOT account for the uncontrollable variables. The tune can be PERFECT for the setup, based on a controlled, engine dynoed, exact duplicate, yada, yada, and if you plug that tune into a car with a problem, well all of a sudden, the tune's not worth crap.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 AM.