PE question.
to care very little about fueling (though some minor
effect might come from scavenging / residual gas,
ditto timing, it should be "in the noise").
Just so there is no confusion I plan on staying in OLSD mode. Does what you say still apply? If yes then
how does the VE, OL table, and PE table work together? I know the OL, and PE
are dividers and multipliers of 14.7. So theoretically is the VE table telling the computer what
the air flow is for a 14.7:1 A/F ratio? So it can then calculate the commanded fuel by the multipliers and dividers?
So why do we set the commanded fuel to what we want and then tune the VE instead of setting the VE to what we want and
then tuning the OL and PE tables? I know a lot of guys will set their OL table to 13.0:1 and tune the VE to that. So how does
the computer change the fueling when the OL table is adjusted back to 14.7:1 or a multiplier of 1, when you don't adjust the VE
table for the change?
The reason I ask is because I have the car pretty well dialed in in OLSD. Part throttle and PE. I just want to be able to change the PE table to maybe lean it out a little more to see if I pick up some time, and not have to mess with retuning the VE.
Thanks for your insight.
If your VE table is deadnuts on you should be able to adjust the PE table (within reason) to whatever you want.
If the VE table is correct you should get whatever you command in PE mode to answer the OP's original question.
cheers
Trending Topics
VE is airflow. Once the PCM knows the amount of airflow into the engine at any given MAP/RPM value then it can add the correct amount of fuel to achieve any commanded AFR
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Ok, I think I see what you are getting at, but why is it that when you change
the VE table the A/F ratio does change? Does the computer not use the VE values in some way to calculate fueling. The way I understand it, is you set the OL table and PE table to what A/F ratio you want then you adjust the VE until you start getting the wideband to match what you are commanding. So how is it not related to fueling in some way? Am I just totally off base here? Not trying to be argumentative just trying to understand what is going on.
the VE table the A/F ratio does change? Does the computer not use the VE values in some way to calculate fueling. The way I understand it, is you set the OL table and PE table to what A/F ratio you want then you adjust the VE until you start getting the wideband to match what you are commanding. So how is it not related to fueling in some way? Am I just totally off base here? Not trying to be argumentative just trying to understand what is going on.
VE Table: This table is used to determine air mass per cylinder in case of MAF failure and also to provide a base airflow value to check for MAF failure. It is also used to provide transient condition correction to the VCM main air mass calculations. Although it is not strictly a VE table in the traditional sense, it is displayed in % for convenience.
The values you end up with in the VE Would be the same either way? That is if you get the % error down to the same amount for each.
The PCM then uses the values set in those tables to calculate how much fuel is needed to reach the commanded AFR, but the tables themselves are just airflow.
The reason it changes the fuel when you mess with the VE or MAF tables is because the PCM thinks that there is a different volume of air. So it adds the amount of fuel it thinks it needs to get what it is commanded. Which will be the wrong amount unless the VE and MAF tables are correct.
The PCM then uses the values set in those tables to calculate how much fuel is needed to reach the commanded AFR, but the tables themselves are just airflow.
The reason it changes the fuel when you mess with the VE or MAF tables is because the PCM thinks that there is a different volume of air. So it adds the amount of fuel it thinks it needs to get what it is commanded. Which will be the wrong amount unless the VE and MAF tables are correct.
It is Airflow values which are used (in some formula) to HELP determine the fueling. But for these values to
be correct the Injectors have to be scaled correctly. So it doesn't matter what commanded A/F you use to arrive at these values, they should end up being the same?
Thanks for everyones input. Was just wanting to verify what I thought to be correct..
2. The PCM looks up the AFR (richer of OL commanded fuel and/or PE tables) independently of airmass computed in 1 above.
3. From 1 and 2 the PCM computes fuelmass.
4. The PCM looks up the IFR table independently of fuelmass computed in 3 above.
5. From 3 and 4 the PCM computes injector pulse width.
2. The PCM looks up the AFR (richer of OL commanded fuel and/or PE tables) independently of airmass computed in 1 above.
3. From 1 and 2 the PCM computes fuelmass.
4. The PCM looks up the IFR table independently of fuelmass computed in 3 above.
5. From 3 and 4 the PCM computes injector pulse width.
Now I am seeing how it all works together. I knew how to go about tuning the car as far as how to setup the scanner and what tables to adjust according to the wideband. Just wanted to know how the computer interprets all this and then determines the amount of fuel. So if no airflow characteristics of the engine change then VE can be left alone.





