how "smooth" should a VE table look like?

Also, I'm in SD open loop..
You know what they say about statistics.
A histogram can get really full of transient garbage and make
the data worse than useless if you're street tuning. You want
to be more selective about what you believe.
I can't get past doing it by hand, based on segments of logs
that I select for being steady conditions and stable WBO2
readings.
In the end the motor is a fairly regular air pump and should
have no abrupt discontinuities. If you've got a porcupine
VE table, that's showing you the truth of "garbage in,
garbage out".
You know what they say about statistics.
A histogram can get really full of transient garbage and make
the data worse than useless if you're street tuning. You want
to be more selective about what you believe.
I can't get past doing it by hand, based on segments of logs
that I select for being steady conditions and stable WBO2
readings.
In the end the motor is a fairly regular air pump and should
have no abrupt discontinuities. If you've got a porcupine
VE table, that's showing you the truth of "garbage in,
garbage out".
The dyno VE table you speak of, was it on a load bearing dyno hitting those specific cruise cells.
LTFT's on or off?
I'm not one of those you have to tune in OL unless you are going leave OL. If you are going to run CL why not tune that with your STFT's. If there is big difference's between OL & CL of course that needs to be addressed.
Your street tuning the VE obviously, how are you collecting the data in those cells?
Trending Topics
Steady state is required to adjust VE accurately. This is where a loaded dyno to hold the engine at a steady rpm while varying load and adjusting the table is the most precise way of doing it.
Now on to your question does it have to be smooth? Smooth is normally the result of what the engine wants. Don't smooth the table to make it "look" good, adjust the table to what it wants. Once finished you will see a trend of smooth contour from low load to high load. Some camshaft intake and header configurations will cause a certain rpm to drop VE or raise VE. The most notable occurence I can think of is 5.3l trucks. They generally want a ridge or ditch all the way up the (if memory serves) 1600rpm column. Smooth that out to the 1200 and 2000 column and you get excessive rich condition. So in the end give the engine what it wants. The only thing I know that should be smooth is up the load point. You are not going to flow more air at 50kpa @2000rpm than you do at 55kpa @2000rpm. So keep that in mind when building a VE table.
Last edited by James@ShorTuning; Jan 31, 2013 at 10:41 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Also, i run a PLX AFR gen 2 wideband with the bosch 14.2 sensor
Last edited by greenvortec97; Jan 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM.
You know what they say about statistics.
A histogram can get really full of transient garbage and make
the data worse than useless if you're street tuning. You want
to be more selective about what you believe.
I can't get past doing it by hand, based on segments of logs
that I select for being steady conditions and stable WBO2
readings.
In the end the motor is a fairly regular air pump and should
have no abrupt discontinuities. If you've got a porcupine
VE table, that's showing you the truth of "garbage in,
garbage out".
Once I get WOT to equal commanded AFR and everything closed loop to within a few percent of zero on the fuel trims it is finished.
This is what a typical mild naturally aspirated setup ends up looking like-
Once I get WOT to equal commanded AFR and everything closed loop to within a few percent of zero on the fuel trims it is finished.
This is what a typical mild naturally aspirated setup ends up looking like-

Here's an example. This car was tuned by a local shop and came in with this-

-And left with this, part throttle air fuel perfect, WOT a/f ratio exactly matching commanded at every boost level and correct transients. You won't accomplish that with huge dips and holes in the table. It just has to make sense.


