Low rev drive cycle
Pressure at the injector orifice is identical to pressure in the fuel rail. Pressure differential is based on fuel rail absolute pressure vs intake absolute pressure. Injector flow rate increases as the differential increases. This is represented in the controller as a table that dictates injector flow vs manifold pressure in some form. That is all there is to it. This info is always provided with the fuel injectors.
In the controller, temperature is used for three major factors - commanded idle airflow, fuel air mixture (usually richer with lower temperature), and spark timing changes.
If a lower temperature thermostat caused idle surge you need to first look at your commanded stoich vs temperature, and your base idle air flows.
Also your exhaust could be causing your oxygen sensors to read false lean, causing the ECU to add fuel, and rich idle will surge - especially in a cammed car.
All the other stuff about temperature influencing injector flow is a distraction. There is. Or much more I can do to help without knowing basic details like say the year, make and model of the car, engine size, cam, intake, electric vs cable throttle, basic exhaust details. Now if you have some super secret ultra gonna break the internet Uber exhaust design, and want to keep secret, that is fine, but still Knowing basic info such as long tubes, x pipe, open headers with extensions is necessary to be of any help.
Any force applied to a body of fluid is transmitted equally and undiminished in all directions; the force acts perpendicular to anything in contact with the fluid.
Or something along those lines, but that conveys the basic law of fluid pressure. It's literally how hydraulics work, and how we use it for hydraulic multiplication (again in hydraulics) so as Darth correctly pointed out, injector pressure is exactly the same as the rail, the fuel line, and anywhere else beyond the source of pressure. Where do you think we check the pressure anyway? The injector?
But that's off topic and wasn't the point of my first post. I was asking about mods, parts, etc, same as Darth, because we can't help at all with your issue with so little information.
Last edited by ChopperDoc; Mar 27, 2019 at 09:10 AM.
When in closed loop, the MAF also plays into this calculation, but is also biased. Under 4000 RPM down to 0, VE is biased more and more for Airflow calculations. Above 4k, MAF is used (stock settings). So at idle VE is biased and used for the majority of airflow calculations, and has a huge affect on your idle.
Mods to the engine change ALL of these things to some degree, which is why we the tune for the mods made to account. We don't install relays and pray the computer just makes up for it.
Trending Topics
Spray cooling systems as I design them are remarkably similar to fuel injection in that regard.
BUT.... understanding of the engine controller is far more important than understanding of physics. I do not really care if temperature slightly changes fuel flow due to viscosity changes, thermal expansion of orifice, etc. I care about knowing how to tell the controller what to do to get the engine to do what I want. You and I are in the same boat.
This is why I think the OP is overthinking it. Trying to apply physics to the engine controller does not always help because you cannot tell the controller fuel viscosity and density vs temperature. What you can do is tell it how much extra fuel to spray while the engine is warming up and do iterative testing to get it right. Or pay someone who knows what they are doing.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I like the physics and curiosity to know more drives me to learn it, however I would still be okay if I didn't for most of the tune, because of simply knowing what to tell the controller. Knowing why something does what it does (theory) isn't necessarily going to be a deal breaker. Just knowing the right direction to take it and why (out of limit or running like ****) is though. If I'm lean I need fuel lol. Do I really need to know why? I do though, but I see your point perfectly.
Too early and the mixture will over pressurize, which adds heat and other ignition points, aka, detonation. If you set it too late, then you miss the opportunity for maximum pressure in the cylinder (mind you under the knock threshold) and lose lots of power. Think of the cylinder pushing into a big spring and being shot back down (advanced) vs trying to push a falling object to make it fall faster (retard). The optimum full burn should be complete no later than 14* ATDC regardless of engine. After that it is wasting potential energy. It's actually rather complicated.
So basically you want to pull all the limits off the computer then? I'm not going to be a part of attempting to circumvent something that has absolutely no advantage whatsoever over simply running a good tune. What you are saying makes no sense at all.
No clue what that last statement meant.





