Question about PLX wideband - help
In my case the voltage doesn’t match with the display (about 0.2 volts too high).
This makes a difference of about 0.4 AF units (so according to the voltage I’m richer than the display).
What is your experience with this unit?
Should I trust the display or the voltage?
My real problem is that I go with the WB signal to the PCM through the A/C connector and read it using Atap.
Atap sees only one decimal, on top of this Atap (or the PCM) rounds up the values.
Example: 2.01 volts from the WB is logged as 2.1 V; but also 2.10 is logged as 2.1V.
The PLX formula is AF=(V*2)+10
0.1V is already 0.2 AF units, to my opinion a too big error. It would be better to go directly to the interface as EFILive (or maybe also HPTuners) and log the real numbers.
I made a test (pls don't call me stupid!): I recorded the display values and the RPM using a digital camers. Then watched the movie in slow motion to see what happens.
The display is refreshed about 8 times in a second (too fast to follow in real time) and I was able to draw a nice curve (excel).
Really time consuming but this would be a way to find out the correction factor, in fact PLX told me to trust the display...
Trending Topics
Looking at the display during WOT it's a little dangerous: 2nd gear goes up to 90 mph and I do log on the highway...
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
In otherwords, when car is in closed loop, M-300 display spends more time above 14.7 than below. Its too bad we cant increase the time average on display. It has too much resolution.
I'll soon try to use the narrow band output to the PCM and compare the LTFT before - after. Just to see how precise is this thing...




