School me on Injector flow rate please!
I have also noticed 10.8 @ WOT in the lower RPM range. I have adjusted the Open Loop EQ ratio a little (-.03) but not a big difference noticed. In an article of GMHTP they decreased the Injector flow rate to lean out their WOT AFR. Anyone ever done this?
BTW what does OLFA mean? Open Loop ? ?
Here's a compare of a stock tune vs these current tables, just shows the difference.

How's my VE table look?
Trending Topics
Bill, please chime in and let me know if I'm posting info I'm not supposed to. Thanks.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

properly has evolved. Used to be everybody said
change the MAF table. But the MAF doesn't just
go changing on you (minus contamination or
Dremel buggery) so why mess that around? The
side effects are not desirable either.
Then the thinking was, change the IFR to get the
right answer for fueling. But similarly, if you have
a table that faithfully represents the fuel delivery
then there has to be a better way to the desired
result than adding one more lie to the mess. Now,
you do want to verify as much as possible the fuel
pressure at the rails, the injector type and flow at
said pressure, just so you believe what GM had to
say about it. Some of this might be "yeah, stock"
and some might want a pressure gauge you can
read at WOT. But looks like your fueling is not
having a pressure problem.
What you want first, before adding a bunch of
overlapping garbage data to the mix, is to see
where the fueling (AFR) falls relative to what is
commanded. You can command the wrong or
right fueling and you can use bad or good air
and fuel inputs. But if you're starting from stock,
clean and tight, there probably are not too many
bad inputs and your rich fueling is on the command
side.
Log your commanded fuel air multiplier (aka EQ Ratio).
This will follow the PE or the OLFA (EQ) table plus
adders plus the occasional cat overtemp protection
hose-down. Whatever the commanded EQ is, you can
follow it back to the source and you can dope out
which needs changing. Most likely PE and COT are
the stock setup problems, both over-fat from the
factory.
14.7/EQ is your commanded AFR. I like to work with
EQ because that's the basis for all the tables. AFR
is what everybody talks about but you have to flip
it over to line up with the tune data.
When you go to adjust the data side, try and stick
to the elements you think most likely to (a) have
changed and (b) be used in-the-moment (e.g. MAF
is a minor contributor at idle and SD is ignored at
steady-MAP high-RPM operation).
Be sure you do not have a low-end mis-trimming
or a trimming response to mods, laying down more
fuel up top (LTFT values at WOT). Trims will drive
you away from commanded, back door style.
properly has evolved. Used to be everybody said
change the MAF table. But the MAF doesn't just
go changing on you (minus contamination or
Dremel buggery) so why mess that around? The
side effects are not desirable either.
Then the thinking was, change the IFR to get the
right answer for fueling. But similarly, if you have
a table that faithfully represents the fuel delivery
then there has to be a better way to the desired
result than adding one more lie to the mess. Now,
you do want to verify as much as possible the fuel
pressure at the rails, the injector type and flow at
said pressure, just so you believe what GM had to
say about it. Some of this might be "yeah, stock"
and some might want a pressure gauge you can
read at WOT. But looks like your fueling is not
having a pressure problem.
What you want first, before adding a bunch of
overlapping garbage data to the mix, is to see
where the fueling (AFR) falls relative to what is
commanded. You can command the wrong or
right fueling and you can use bad or good air
and fuel inputs. But if you're starting from stock,
clean and tight, there probably are not too many
bad inputs and your rich fueling is on the command
side.
Log your commanded fuel air multiplier (aka EQ Ratio).
This will follow the PE or the OLFA (EQ) table plus
adders plus the occasional cat overtemp protection
hose-down. Whatever the commanded EQ is, you can
follow it back to the source and you can dope out
which needs changing. Most likely PE and COT are
the stock setup problems, both over-fat from the
factory.
14.7/EQ is your commanded AFR. I like to work with
EQ because that's the basis for all the tables. AFR
is what everybody talks about but you have to flip
it over to line up with the tune data.
When you go to adjust the data side, try and stick
to the elements you think most likely to (a) have
changed and (b) be used in-the-moment (e.g. MAF
is a minor contributor at idle and SD is ignored at
steady-MAP high-RPM operation).
Be sure you do not have a low-end mis-trimming
or a trimming response to mods, laying down more
fuel up top (LTFT values at WOT). Trims will drive
you away from commanded, back door style.
EDIT: My COT is turned off VIA RWTD, and I have a Racetronix Fuel system. Would this affect what or where I need to tune?
Last edited by WS6HUMMER; Dec 6, 2006 at 10:10 AM.
Without a wideband? When you actually have more mods than just bolt ons, fueling becomes more and more critical. Do you want to depend upon pseudo science and guessing with a forced induction setup or NO2? Take the high road, there are many published accounts of how to put your car into Open loop Speed Density and retune the VE table with a wideband. That is after you undo any lies setup by others with Injector Values or whatnot. Make sure to turn off your fuel trims and reset any previously stored values before you begin SD tuning. After successfully retuning the VE tables which can be done relatively easily with immediate results (even quicker with Hp's realtime or EFI Live's RR), turn the MAF back on if you choose to run it. Don't turn your trims back on yet. Rescale the MAF. Done. The modding bug bites us all who travel these boards, it starts out with bolt ons, the H/C, power adders, build your tuning house with a solid foundation for the future instead of getting cheesy and sleezy.
Tuning the VE and MAF is not that hard, especially with a wideband. I can have the two precisely tuned and inline with the commanded AFR in two hours of street driving time. Then when I go to the dyno, I am assured that the AFR I command using the PE Table will be correct as verified yet again by the wideband. VE and MAF Tuning is not controversial, tuning using the IFR and PE Table to get the WOT fuel only is controversial. There are proper methods of going about doing things, do not take the short cut because it gets answer quickly. Think about it in terms of building an engine ... you wouldn't use shortcuts to build it, you would build it the correct way.
Tuning the VE and MAF is not that hard, especially with a wideband. I can have the two precisely tuned and inline with the commanded AFR in two hours of street driving time. Then when I go to the dyno, I am assured that the AFR I command using the PE Table will be correct as verified yet again by the wideband. VE and MAF Tuning is not controversial, tuning using the IFR and PE Table to get the WOT fuel only is controversial. There are proper methods of going about doing things, do not take the short cut because it gets answer quickly. Think about it in terms of building an engine ... you wouldn't use shortcuts to build it, you would build it the correct way.
1. In your closed loop enable temp table, set it to the highest value
2. Disbale the fuel trims
3. Set your OLFA table to 1, you want to target a non-moving commanded AFR
4. Disable any AFR modifiers (such as COT, DFCO, PE AFR vs. ECT, etc.), you don't want any interferrence from outside tables
5. Copy HO timing table to LO, you don't want spark butting into the tuning
6. Set your entire PE table to command 12.8 (this is my method for N/A, 12.0 for boost), this is just to get the fueling correct, after you can adjust the commanded AFR to get you the most power as verified with a dyno
7. set MAF Fail to zero, you can Disable the SES light if you wish (I do
)8. Use your histograms to verify the fuel and make the changes to the VE table, once the AFR is with in 1%+/- you are done
9. Reset the MAF Fail to the stock setting and use the MAF histogram to correct for fuel differences with in the same range (+/- 1%)
10. Once the fuel is to your liking, re-enable closed loop and allow the PCM to learn the new tune.

