LS1 Edit & PE Table Adjustment
LS1 Edit & PE Table Adjustment Any ideas on how to get a more accurate range in the PE table?
How can you make changest to small range of RPM than what is segmented in the table.
Any sway to smooth this out?
Any help or thoughts appreciated!
How can you make changest to small range of RPM than what is segmented in the table.
Any sway to smooth this out?
Any help or thoughts appreciated!
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
Custom OS from efilive fully commanded table by rpm and map is your best bet.
The PE table is automatically interpolated from the adjacent cells by the pcm as are most/all of the other tables IIRC.
The PE table is automatically interpolated from the adjacent cells by the pcm as are most/all of the other tables IIRC.
Originally Posted by ringram
Custom OS from efilive fully commanded table by rpm and map is your best bet.
The PE table is automatically interpolated from the adjacent cells by the pcm as are most/all of the other tables IIRC.
The PE table is automatically interpolated from the adjacent cells by the pcm as are most/all of the other tables IIRC.
True. In respect with RPM it has the same resolution as the PE table.
Perhaps the MAF table might have more resolution if you thought about what the frequencies would be in terms of WOT. I have yet to try lying in the MAF table though. It might be more customizable then VE or PE. VE and PE having the same resolution.
Originally Posted by Billiumss
Set your PE table to what you want, ~ 1.13. Then you can tune the MAF table with a WB O2.
That sounds like a good idea but wouldn't it mess up the LTFT's at WOT and prevent them from being zero?
Obviously EFI live is much more customizable by the sounds of it. I wish LS1 Edit has smaller ranges in their PE table. It would make life much easier.
Anyone else have a solution that will work in LS1 Edit?
Trending Topics
As an example, when you are doing your WOT tuning on a dyno with a wide band, you might find a dip in the A/F ratio at say 5000 RPM. LS1 edit might have a entry in the PE table for 4800 and 5200 but chaning either might screw up the ideal A/F ratio you already have at 4800 or 5200. What do you do to correct the problem in between the values? I know the computer does smoothing on the values in between but you still have to screw something up to correct the in between figure do you not?
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
using your example of 4800 and 5200, how different are you values between those cells? I know these aren't the values you are using but my point is working around the resolution problem. Make sure there isn't a huge difference between the different PE numbers if any then go back in the ve table and smooth it out as well. Since the PE is just a multiplier your ve table can get some more work to make the PE do what you want it to do
As an example, when you are doing your WOT tuning on a dyno with a wide band, you might find a dip in the A/F ratio at say 5000 RPM. LS1 edit might have a entry in the PE table for 4800 and 5200 but chaning either might screw up the ideal A/F ratio you already have at 4800 or 5200. What do you do to correct the problem in between the values? I know the computer does smoothing on the values in between but you still have to screw something up to correct the in between figure do you not?
you don't "tune" the PE table to get the airfuel correct (this may have been common practice in 2002-3)
you set it to your desired lambda (well, equilivence ratio) and then tune the airflow to get the fueling correct.
Ryan
you set it to your desired lambda (well, equilivence ratio) and then tune the airflow to get the fueling correct.
Ryan
So are you setting the PE to your commanded A/F ratio and then using the MAF table to get the actual A/F to what you want it to be? Are you doing that off MAF frequency in your scans?
Get on Hptuners.com and check out some stickys....
