Pontiac Firebird 1967-2002 Birds of a feather flock together

Firebird concept photochops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2005 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
madprops0's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland FL
Default Firebird concept photochops

Hey guys would you mine whipin down the highway in these birds ?
Attached Thumbnails Firebird concept photochops-2008.jpg   Firebird concept photochops-2008-.jpg  
Old 08-22-2005 | 11:32 PM
  #2  
Letsndy's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Default

ill definetly take one of those!
Old 08-22-2005 | 11:33 PM
  #3  
HPP's Avatar
HPP
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Default

The first one is just a distorted 4th Gen. Wider is better, and that one thing is good, but it's too slammed, too distorted, has exposed lights, and a hood from a grand am, the separation of the holes doesn't look right.

The second one is better, except for the camaro mouth on the the front. Firebirds (and Trans Ams) are sleek, aerodynamic, and aggressive. The only holes on the front of the car are for air intakes or heat extraction. This has been the case since about '77 or so (IIRC). And the only reason it didn't start sooner was technology and standard design practices. A closed nose (bottom breather for radiator), and hidden lights are both Firebird and Trans Am design hallmarks (the former lasting about 25 years and the latter about 20 years, practically half of their existence), they can not be shrugged off.

If that second pic was larger, and had a more 3rd Gen nose to it it would work better and look more like a Firebird (crossed with an XJ220, but still.....).


.02¢
Old 08-23-2005 | 06:09 AM
  #4  
demonspeed's Avatar
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

I'd agree the first one sucks. It's a hacked up Formula
Old 08-23-2005 | 09:04 AM
  #5  
y2k_ta's Avatar
'Bird Director
20 Year Member
iTrader: (80)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,824
Likes: 27
From: Central Indiana Honors: 4th grade spelling bee contestant
Default

No thanks
Old 08-23-2005 | 03:51 PM
  #6  
Cephiros's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: chicago burbs
Default

i like the second one id drive that, tho i still think the 4th genners look meaner
Old 08-23-2005 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
~JOSHUA's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,757
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

I hope the person doing the photochop didn't spend more than an hour on 'em...
Old 08-23-2005 | 04:52 PM
  #8  
ZEEMAN's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: HOT-LANTA
Default

I would rather eat **** than drive either one of em honestly
Old 08-23-2005 | 05:30 PM
  #9  
madprops0's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland FL
Default

Originally Posted by ZEEMAN
I would rather eat **** than drive either one of em honestly


Well i guess we all know what kinda taste you have in cars LOL



TIME TO EAT UP **** EATER !
Old 08-23-2005 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
9silverbird8's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

Good god those are ugly. A hacked up formula or a new-era eclipse? I'll drive my 'old' hawk thank you.
Old 08-23-2005 | 07:18 PM
  #11  
Andros's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Ranches, Florida
Default

I seriously doubt the next gen f-body would look better than the 4th gen f-bodies........at least not the T/A's
Old 08-23-2005 | 07:56 PM
  #12  
02 Camaro SS's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
From: Rockland County, NY
Default

They look to much like a jaguar xj220 or something. Not mean and aggressive enough
4th gen
Old 08-24-2005 | 01:50 AM
  #13  
BANDITCAR's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: THE BANDIT'S LAIR in Louisiana
Default

the first is just too "hacked together"
and
the second one doesn't have enough Firebird heritage in it.

I liked the one-off 03 Heritage Trans Am. The White one with Blue interior and shaker hood. That was sweet looking.

Last edited by BANDITCAR; 08-24-2005 at 09:28 AM.
Old 08-24-2005 | 07:59 AM
  #14  
SamD_Ind's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, In
Default

It would have to have at least an LS7 under the hood
Old 08-24-2005 | 08:13 AM
  #15  
fasttagurl's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 805
Likes: 1
From: Arlington, Texas (Dallas Area)
Default

Ya, I would have to agree. They do not look really good. Hopefully there will be/are better concepts than that coming out. We really need something to blow the Ford's away!!
Old 08-24-2005 | 08:16 AM
  #16  
1999Daytona500PaceCar's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Needville, TX
Wink

I won't be quite so harsh - yes the first is just a distorted and slammed 4th Gen Formula which doesn't work too well to start up the 5th Gen. But the 2nd isn't really all that bad except for the grill opening - it definitely needs to be a bottom feeder as mentioned above. And the proportions suggest it might be even heavier than 4th Gens which would be a definite No-No!

Oh, but thanks for giving us something new to look at since GM doesn't care to...

Last edited by 1999Daytona500PaceCar; 08-25-2005 at 05:40 AM.
Old 08-24-2005 | 10:34 AM
  #17  
HPP's Avatar
HPP
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 02 Camaro SS
They look to much like a jaguar xj220 or something. Not mean and aggressive enough












Must have one. In Aramanth Metallic (first 2 pics) too. Super sleek, downright awesome looking, incredibly fast, and tons and tons of lateral grip. Definitely one of my dream cars.

But it would seem difficult to make one look like a Firebird, or Trans Am though.
Old 08-24-2005 | 11:42 AM
  #18  
2000WS6TA's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: finksburg, MD
Default

i got excited when i read the post because i knew about the camaro concepts but not the firebird. then i saw the pis and was a bit dissapointed. 4th gen rocks and i dont think any car looks as bad *** as the 4th gen ws6.
Old 08-24-2005 | 07:25 PM
  #19  
STRETCH'S T/A's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: Lisle, IL
Default

yeah, the post caught my attention, but seeing those pics i was horrified
Old 08-24-2005 | 11:20 PM
  #20  
Luna's Avatar
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,185
Likes: 3
From: Highland, Indiana
Default

I really hope they don't try to bring the Trans Am back because there is no way they could possibly bring it back without screwing it up!! I would hate to see them ruin the heritage they have created with something like that. A Camaro I think they could pull off but a Trans Am to me has a whole different kind of heritage to it.

Those were both ugly as hell and I hope GM doesnt think about it for more than a couple seconds. I mean look at the GTO , they screwed that up REAL good



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.