Pontiac GTO 2004-2006 The Modern Goat

gto vs f-bodies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2008 | 08:41 PM
  #101  
demonspeed's Avatar
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by black2002SScamaro
cars need to be getting lighter, GM needs to increase fuel economy on all its models. I drove by a large truck dealership the other day and saw $15,000 off of some of the large trucks. The new Z28s should weigh 3000 not 3800.
3000? Ha! No, not close to 3000. More like 3600-ish.
Old 06-21-2008 | 11:43 AM
  #102  
RJ-92's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by demonspeed
3000? Ha! No, not close to 3000. More like 3600-ish.
I think he is saying 3000 is what GM SHOULD have desinged it to weigh instead of 3600.
Old 06-21-2008 | 12:50 PM
  #103  
LSWONGTO's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein AB, Germany
Default

Thats kinda funny how F-body guys' next gen f-body is really just a G8.
Old 06-21-2008 | 12:51 PM
  #104  
LSWONGTO's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein AB, Germany
Default

Then we can have 4th genFbody Vs GTO/5th gen fbody debates!!!
Old 06-21-2008 | 01:56 PM
  #105  
WSsick's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 3
From: St. Peters, MO
Default

this thread is nothing but people saying the same things with the same experience in which their car is better than the other, with the exception of a few posts and a few people that have owned both.


on a side note, i have begun the horrible waiting & saving process so that ill be the owner of a 5th gen z28, if all goes according to plan. (2012 model year correct?)
Old 06-22-2008 | 01:18 AM
  #106  
1994lt1ss's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

my 1993 lt1 camaro with a 2002 camaro ss front end has smoked 5.7L gtos like nothing and my cars auto and all the gto's ive raced were 6 speeds but id have to say that 6.0L gto halls some *** and i know its faster than some of the ls1s like a 98 ls1 only runs 13.8's in the quarter so go figure but the 2002 ss 35th anv runs like 13.2's in the quarter so go figure the 6.0L will outrun some of the ls1's stock and lt1s but not the 5.7L gto its slow power to weight ratio
Old 06-22-2008 | 05:27 AM
  #107  
blkbltgoat's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1994lt1ss
my 1993 lt1 camaro with a 2002 camaro ss front end has smoked 5.7L gtos like nothing and my cars auto and all the gto's ive raced were 6 speeds but id have to say that 6.0L gto halls some *** and i know its faster than some of the ls1s like a 98 ls1 only runs 13.8's in the quarter so go figure but the 2002 ss 35th anv runs like 13.2's in the quarter so go figure the 6.0L will outrun some of the ls1's stock and lt1s but not the 5.7L gto its slow power to weight ratio
please never post again.
Old 06-22-2008 | 09:29 AM
  #108  
325trooper's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 1994lt1ss
my 1993 lt1 camaro with a 2002 camaro ss front end has smoked 5.7L gtos like nothing and my cars auto and all the gto's ive raced were 6 speeds but id have to say that 6.0L gto halls some *** and i know its faster than some of the ls1s like a 98 ls1 only runs 13.8's in the quarter so go figure but the 2002 ss 35th anv runs like 13.2's in the quarter so go figure the 6.0L will outrun some of the ls1's stock and lt1s but not the 5.7L gto its slow power to weight ratio
my bone stock 1976 camero with 1979 z28 fenders and 305 two barrel carb crushes lt1 f bodies like a damn monster truck except for those lt4's which are pretty quick and run 10.5's in the quarter because all the new airbags and computers add so much weight that they are pigs unless they are an auto with an ls1 wannabe poser front nose then it's pretty close but six speeds are no problem and it will eat alot of ls1's besides the stripper police edition cameros
Old 06-22-2008 | 10:09 AM
  #109  
massillongoat's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: massillon,oh
Default

okay lt1 your smoking crack hands down hate to say it...but no lt1 has ever touched me not even close....so please put down the crack pipe
Old 06-22-2008 | 11:18 AM
  #110  
sappy96's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Hampton VA
Default

this thread sucks
Old 06-22-2008 | 01:50 PM
  #111  
AlexLs1's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by sappy96
this thread sucks
I agree. It started out giving and sharing opinions/experiences but now it's a pissing contest.
Old 06-22-2008 | 02:36 PM
  #112  
demonspeed's Avatar
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by LSWONGTO
Thats kinda funny how F-body guys' next gen f-body is really just a G8.
Shhhh...

FWIW, The Camaro isn't going to be a simple badge-slap modification like the GTOs were. It is engineered to be a different vehicle inside and out, though it will be just like that sedan-boat G8/Commodore at the heart.

Hopefully it will be everything that's great about 4th gens and the GTO in one package. How's that sound?
Old 06-22-2008 | 02:37 PM
  #113  
demonspeed's Avatar
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by sappy96
this thread sucks
Agree.

Nothing like trying to say how great your car is when you can't even spell it correctly.
Old 06-23-2008 | 09:29 AM
  #114  
AlexLs1's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by demonspeed

Hopefully it will be everything that's great about 4th gens and the GTO in one package. How's that sound?

Yeah I think that would be loved throughout the F-body/GTO/Vette crowds. Depending on what people are looking for via performance and daily driving needs. To fit them.

But I highly doubt it'll happen. Just based on reputation. Reputation regarding to GM how there are so many different aspects as well as the cars. Yes they have to do this into appeal to different markets but they lack of looking imbetween the lines if you will. Setteling in the middle. Also known as what you just said a 2010 Camaro with a GTO type package.

I agree with you though and why you said this.

F-body like looks/styling, GTO interior comfort, Corvette power and handling. Best of all worlds, I think most would agree. I doubt the new Camaro will be anything of the sort it'll have its draw backs somewhere just like every other car. But what car doesnt, stock or modified.

I would love it to be what I described but I just can't see this happening.

I know you said this comment as a means to settle something.

BUT! This is just my opinion and my thoughts.
Old 06-23-2008 | 12:01 PM
  #115  
demonspeed's Avatar
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

You can't win everyone over. The GTO guys hate it because it's not a GTO. The 4th gen guys hate it because it's not a 4th gen.

What does separate it is the amount of R&D going into the car. The GTO was given to us rather quickly, but so were all of the inherit Monaro problems. I think GM is going to make this thing right. Will there be faults? Yes, but it's going to be a great car.
Old 06-23-2008 | 12:36 PM
  #116  
AlexLs1's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by demonspeed
You can't win everyone over. The GTO guys hate it because it's not a GTO. The 4th gen guys hate it because it's not a 4th gen.

What does separate it is the amount of R&D going into the car. The GTO was given to us rather quickly, but so were all of the inherit Monaro problems. I think GM is going to make this thing right. Will there be faults? Yes, but it's going to be a great car.

Actually thinking about it more. There was speculation about this car for a while. Despite the promo in Transformers. Prior to that also. GM are in debt huge amounts. I think they are wanting this car to help pull them threw that issue.

The GTO was an easy fix/replacement for GM in regards to the muscle car market. (NO one debate this: 04-06 GTO not a muscle car; been covered, opinionated topic) The GTO is what's supposed to replace the F-body. Did it do a good job? No as far as sales. Performance, arguable depending on how serious performance you want, Pros and Cons, or if your going to modify the car. Relative, there are easier ways of acomplishing things.

I hope it is a great car, but I can't see it improving that much from the Ls1 F-body. Time will tell.
Old 07-16-2008 | 09:10 PM
  #117  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 51
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by massillongoat
mines and ls1 and I walk away from them stock
i'm your huckleberry....
Old 07-16-2008 | 09:47 PM
  #118  
hivoltagedriver's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Owasso, OK
Default

Originally Posted by blkbltgoat
excuse me! what are you doing talking about positive features about both cars. this thread is only for bashing one car while pretending the other is god's gift to machines.
In light of this, I have a few things to add. GTO > F-body...PERIOD. JMHO.

I have owned so many F-bodies that I stopped counting. The build quality sucked on almost all of them. I liked my '79 WS6, but that is a different story. My GTO on the other hand does not rattle, squeek, clunk, bang, or whine. The doors shut solid every time, and don't sag. I have seen some low mileage F-bodies that are well on their way to a salvage yard already. I also have an '04 BMW 330ci, and the Goat compares nicely in build quality, handling, and comfort. I have raced heavily modded LT1's, as well as several LS1 F-bodies, and have no trouble laying the smack down on any of them. I think either car responds well to mods, so we won't even go there.

All you F-body fans prepare for this....the new Zeta chassis that the Camaro is going to be built on is already in production....in the G8, and was developed by Holden....

Anyways, not to **** anyone off, just my .02 worth.
Old 07-17-2008 | 08:01 AM
  #119  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 51
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by hivoltagedriver
I have raced heavily modded LT1's, as well as several LS1 F-bodies, and have no trouble laying the smack down on any of them.
13.18 @ 108.82mph, 2.135 60' (wheel-hopping)

Hmmmm....

Define 'smack down'..

13.19 @ 108.59mph, 2.152 60' (tapping limiter on the 2~3 shift, full tank of gas, full weight) and I am bone stock.

Old 07-17-2008 | 02:56 PM
  #120  
Coy's Avatar
Coy
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 12
From: O'Fallon, MO
Default

Nice pissing contest.


Quick Reply: gto vs f-bodies



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.