Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2v mustang gt vs ls1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2016, 01:02 PM
  #341  
On The Tree
iTrader: (23)
 
Blown383LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 108
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by *Tips Fedora*
You're still trying to make it seem like your 2v was impressive. And it never was. Maybe it was mildly impressive to high school kids in 1999, but not to big dogs like myself.
Old 06-02-2016, 01:03 PM
  #342  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Old 06-02-2016, 01:36 PM
  #343  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Looks about right for an automatic convertible. The NPI Mustangs never should have existed.
Old 06-02-2016, 01:53 PM
  #344  
Banned
 
*Tips Fedora*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Headers, tire, lid, 4.10's, suspension. Am I the only one here that remembers how much power that headers and a lid adds?
You said LBO LS1, chief. The car that Hio is referring to, made around 340rwhp, IIRC. Right in line with these cars.
Old 06-02-2016, 01:55 PM
  #345  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,145
Received 205 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by *Tips Fedora*
Are you dizzy as well as dopey, kid? Please tell me how a typical race between an LS1 F body and a stock 2v GT would go? BUSES. Again the 2v GT is not and never was impressive at all. Even in 1999 when a stock Grand Prix was a good race for a 2v GT.
A typical race between a stock LS1 F body and a stock 2v GT was 13.2 vs 13.9. Some guys paid $4k more for their 99 Z28 and almost $10k more if they opted for the SS or the ram air.

I certainly wouldn't drop even $1k into a 2v platform these days because for the $ it wouldn't make sense, but back then when the car was new, it was some good fun.

Nothing like being a college student in a brand new 1999 Mustang GT looking at brand new ls1's in my rearview pulling buss lengths with the same amount of money spent. It happened, and it was impressive to any ls1 owner I went up against (at that time)

That being said, should someone be impressed by a 99 Z28's with gears, stall, LTs, tire, and bottle beating bolt on 2v 99 GT's on the bottle? "I spent $4k more on my Z with the same bolt ons as you and it's faster?"

That is to be expected.... unless you are spending $30k+ on a 99 Cobra back in the day that was slow as ****. I felt so bad for those guys...

Thing is, you don't even need a power adder on a 2v 4.6 to run low 11's...
A 383 long block and throw on a bullet intake...

Here's a vid of the guy's car that tuned my car running 11's on a NA 2v:

Old 06-02-2016, 02:02 PM
  #346  
Banned
 
*Tips Fedora*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I used to do the exact same thing (pull buses) to 2v and 3v's in my first GTP that I modded about 10 years ago. I don't see your point. 2v's do not typically run 13.9 either. More like 14.4. And an LS1 will **** all over them from any roll speed. After 70 mph it's gets real ugly real fast for the 2v.
Old 06-02-2016, 02:15 PM
  #347  
On The Tree
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dirty D, CA
Posts: 134
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Why can't you just accept the fact that he beat some LS1 cars in a mustang back in the day? It's not that odd.
Old 06-02-2016, 02:17 PM
  #348  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The conditions where a 5spd 2V runs a 14.4 would put a 6spd LS1 at ~13.5. It's easier to just say that the 2V is a high 13s capable car, and the LS1 is a high 12s capable car.
Old 06-02-2016, 02:19 PM
  #349  
Teching In
 
slowZZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick.H
Why can't you just accept the fact that he beat some LS1 cars in a mustang back in the day? It's not that odd.
'Cause every time a car you have wrapped your entire world in loses it's like losing a little part of yourself.
Old 06-02-2016, 02:24 PM
  #350  
Banned
 
*Tips Fedora*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick.H
Why can't you just accept the fact that he beat some LS1 cars in a mustang back in the day? It's not that odd.
Did I say he didn't, dumbfuck? I also beat LS1s in my Grand Prixs. Modded cars tend to beat stock cars. Derp.
Old 06-02-2016, 02:26 PM
  #351  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,145
Received 205 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by *Tips Fedora*
I used to do the exact same thing (pull buses) to 2v and 3v's in my first GTP that I modded about 10 years ago. I don't see your point. 2v's do not typically run 13.9 either. More like 14.4. And an LS1 will **** all over them from any roll speed. After 70 mph it's gets real ugly real fast for the 2v.
Yes, well aware that the 99 LS1 is faster than the 99 2v hence why people were willing to paying $4k - $10k more for them back then. I never (BACK THEN) lost to an ls1 that didn't have more money put into the car (mods + price of car) than what I had. Not saying that it couldn't be done with the right combo on a 99 Z back then for $25k + some parts, I just never came across it.

As for the GTP, one of them that I had was a 2001 Pace car with all the Whalen lights and **** on it. Bought it for $14,500 back in the day, put 50k miles on it, and then sold it for more than I paid for it 2 years later. Dealer thought it was a regular GTP....
Old 06-02-2016, 03:15 PM
  #352  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

There's good reason why the 2v's are irregarded
Old 06-02-2016, 03:25 PM
  #353  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,942
Received 434 Likes on 341 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Lol, you're getting me confused with 5.7stroker. He is the one that went 11's with a boosted 2v. I said that my FBO 2V was quite a bit faster than any of my Fbodies and LS2 gto.



Yeah, it was a LBO, which by Hio's standards means that it should have been in the 11's. Cause I guarantee that those headers and tune added more power than UDP's, a MAF, and an LS6 intake.

Prove it.
May have got you guys confused......and it's highly unlikely your bolt on 2v beat even a stock ls2 gto.


gor Someone wanting me to post someone elses vid of a car close to what i claim and have posted proof of you have yet to back up anything you say .

How bout posting some proof of your own ****.


And btw


3.73 car will likely out trap a 4.10 car because well......gear calc *******. If you had half a brain you would've done figured this out.




Originally Posted by *Tips Fedora*
Stock LS1 Camaro Runs 12.69 @ 110 MPH - YouTube

Probably could have ran even quicker with that trap speed. Driver likely wasn't the greatest.
Lolz
Originally Posted by *Tips Fedora*
Stock Internal LS1 11 Second 1/4 Mile - YouTube

Solid 11s in a LBO stalled car. 116mph traps.
Oopps....more lolz
Originally Posted by JC316
Could have, but didn't. Not to mention that the example Hi gave trapped 4MPH faster with less gear and also had no tire.



Long tube, stalled, tire, maf, intake, lid, suspension, and probably a tune. Again, I can buy that, just has way more power mods than hio claimed.
It's trapping 4mph faster than some because the some sucks.
Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
Yes, well aware that the 99 LS1 is faster than the 99 2v hence why people were willing to paying $4k - $10k more for them back then. I never (BACK THEN) lost to an ls1 that didn't have more money put into the car (mods + price of car) than what I had. Not saying that it couldn't be done with the right combo on a 99 Z back then for $25k + some parts, I just never came across it.

As for the GTP, one of them that I had was a 2001 Pace car with all the Whalen lights and **** on it. Bought it for $14,500 back in the day, put 50k miles on it, and then sold it for more than I paid for it 2 years later. Dealer thought it was a regular GTP....
I already posted my window sticker. There is no where near 10k difference i don't know why uou keep spewing that ****. I bet comparable optioned 2v and ls1 cars were less than 2k apart.
Old 06-02-2016, 03:33 PM
  #354  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,145
Received 205 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

2v 4.6 can be made to be fast though. There's one running 8.0 at 169
It may not be a Casper ls1 running 6.86 @ 205, but 8 sec flat isn't that bad.
Old 06-02-2016, 03:46 PM
  #355  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,145
Received 205 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I already posted my window sticker. There is no where near 10k difference i don't know why uou keep spewing that ****. I bet comparable optioned 2v and ls1 cars were less than 2k apart.
There certainly was a 10k difference with the SS and Ram Air depending on options. Your thinking of the 99 Z28 which was the cheaper of the 3. The dealership I bought my 99 GT from brand new was asking $21500, it was leather 5 speed without the mach 460. (which I think was a $500 option) I can find paper work if need be. I already posted window stickers of the 99 Camaro SS and 99 ram air costing $30K plus and with what options? 3.42's, monsoon T-tops and leather?

Here's a thread with several guys talking about their 99's being $30k plus.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/general-l...er-prices.html

No need to fault people for spending $9-$10k more on a car that only went a sec faster in the 1/4 mile. Maybe back then they wanted a ram air or SS and didn't care for the look of the Mustang and didn't mind paying that much money to be a second faster on average stock for stock.

Last edited by 5.7stroker; 06-02-2016 at 03:56 PM.
Old 06-02-2016, 03:56 PM
  #356  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 84 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
May have got you guys confused......and it's highly unlikely your bolt on 2v beat even a stock ls2 gto.


gor Someone wanting me to post someone elses vid of a car close to what i claim and have posted proof of you have yet to back up anything you say .

How bout posting some proof of your own ****.
Why should I have to prove my **** if you don't have to prove yours? Take my word for it, you have absolutely no idea what a 2V is capable of.
Old 06-02-2016, 04:04 PM
  #357  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,145
Received 205 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Why should I have to prove my **** if you don't have to prove yours? Take my word for it, you have absolutely no idea what a 2V is capable of.
It's capable of 8.0 @ 169, I can tell you that. And that's with the 4.6.....
It get's better with the 5.4
Old 06-02-2016, 04:53 PM
  #358  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,942
Received 434 Likes on 341 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
2v 4.6 can be made to be fast though. There's one running 8.0 at 169
It may not be a Casper ls1 running 6.86 @ 205, but 8 sec flat isn't that bad.
I don't care about either one of those.
Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
There certainly was a 10k difference with the SS and Ram Air depending on options. Your thinking of the 99 Z28 which was the cheaper of the 3. The dealership I bought my 99 GT from brand new was asking $21500, it was leather 5 speed without the mach 460. (which I think was a $500 option) I can find paper work if need be. I already posted window stickers of the 99 Camaro SS and 99 ram air costing $30K plus and with what options? 3.42's, monsoon T-tops and leather?

Here's a thread with several guys talking about their 99's being $30k plus.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/general-l...er-prices.html

No need to fault people for spending $9-$10k more on a car that only went a sec faster in the 1/4 mile. Maybe back then they wanted a ram air or SS and didn't care for the look of the Mustang and didn't mind paying that much money to be a second faster on average stock for stock.
Your about as dumb as jc if your trying to option up a camaro to prove your stupid point.

Fact is the ****** cars were priced similar. You don't have to buy a ss just as yoy didn't have to buy a cobro.

Jesus christ do you dumb ******* ever get tired if being stupid?
Originally Posted by JC316
Why should I have to prove my **** if you don't have to prove yours? Take my word for it, you have absolutely no idea what a 2V is capable of.
I posted mod list/vid and can post the slip if you like. Now post up something you dud bitch.....with some proof

From the sounds of it you have no idea what a ls1 is capable of.

I'm smart enough to know a ls1 is far more capable than a 2v.....your not.
Old 06-02-2016, 05:01 PM
  #359  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,613
Received 63 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
A typical race between a stock LS1 F body and a stock 2v GT was 13.2 vs 13.9. Some guys paid $4k more for their 99 Z28 and almost $10k more if they opted for the SS or the ram air.

I certainly wouldn't drop even $1k into a 2v platform these days because for the $ it wouldn't make sense, but back then when the car was new, it was some good fun.

Nothing like being a college student in a brand new 1999 Mustang GT looking at brand new ls1's in my rearview pulling buss lengths with the same amount of money spent. It happened, and it was impressive to any ls1 owner I went up against (at that time)

That being said, should someone be impressed by a 99 Z28's with gears, stall, LTs, tire, and bottle beating bolt on 2v 99 GT's on the bottle? "I spent $4k more on my Z with the same bolt ons as you and it's faster?"

That is to be expected.... unless you are spending $30k+ on a 99 Cobra back in the day that was slow as ****. I felt so bad for those guys...

Thing is, you don't even need a power adder on a 2v 4.6 to run low 11's...
A 383 long block and throw on a bullet intake...

Here's a vid of the guy's car that tuned my car running 11's on a NA 2v:

Dyno - Ken Bjonnes - 2000 Mustang GT - YouTube

That stuff didn't exist then for 2 valves and even if it did no one could tune something like that. Only person that made 2 valve stuff was Sean Hyland and that was if he wasn't ripping you off. Fastest 4 valve na guys were running mid to high 11s then. Even Superfly aka Stupidfly on its second motor struggled to run high 11s with head cams. Fastest mods guys back then was Paul Sivicky,Barry Shepard,Mike Smith, and Bob Cosby. 2 valves were very ever in the 11s back then and all of them were power adders. Stop with the bullshit. I raced my fox back then and hung out with most of the fast mod guys
Old 06-02-2016, 05:13 PM
  #360  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 84 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I posted mod list/vid and can post the slip if you like. Now post up something you dud bitch.....with some proof

From the sounds of it you have no idea what a ls1 is capable of.

I'm smart enough to know a ls1 is far more capable than a 2v.....your not.
I also posted up a mod list. My story is just as unverifiable as your story.


Quick Reply: 2v mustang gt vs ls1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.