Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

LS1 vs 4.6's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2008, 07:34 PM
  #101  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ponygt65
I'll leave that one alone....too easy.


On a side note, there was an old article that tested a 289 K-code motor with minor mods.....IDK how many of you know, but that motor will handle 8k RPMs, from the factory, no problem.
That sumbitch better have had Vtec.
Old 10-29-2008, 09:37 PM
  #102  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
InEEdSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crossville,TN
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrbigjeep
my buddy was running 13.8's with just intake and DR's. and my other buddy has an auto with 3.73's and ran 13.7 spinning (his on the other hand is a freak)

and i ran 8.8 in the eighth with shifter and no mufflers. i'm just saying this because your first statement is completely wrong. with full bolt on's the edge gt's run low 13's or 13 flat. assuming they have a good driver. i have 2 buddies that ran 8.5 and 8.6 (or a high 8.5) with full bolt ons

and like said, there are tons of people running 13 flat or low 13's with full bolt on's. and "2v in the twelves" ran just below a 13 flat and he doesn't even have full bolt ons...and as far as i know most ls1 fbody's don't run high twelves or even right at 13 flat.
I wanna know where i was completely wrong. Point that out to me please. Also, just because some of your buddies ran a low 13 or 13 flat doesnt mean my statement wasnt true. Also, configure altitude, traction, ect into the equation. In other words, what are you talking about?
Old 10-29-2008, 11:02 PM
  #103  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Ruckus46Gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm a little late into this discussion and might be able to shed a little light into this discussion. I am not reading all 6 pages I can tell you that right off the bat but read most of the front page. Yes gears wake the hell up out of a 2v, most go to small. A stalled auto 2v will run right with a 5 speed 2v unlike what was said earlier. A 2v can give a ls1 car a run for its money, but more work will be done to the 2v its the nature of the beast your starting from a lower power car. Just bolt ons the ls1 car has the advantage, a 2v will jump out hard on the ls1 car however wont have enough to hold it(2vs with 4.10s will go through the traps just at redline with 4.10s so 110-112 ish...4.30s will go through the traps same mph but be around 6200rpms so whoever is saying 115-120 on a bolt on 2v with 4.10s is what they top out in 4th gear is full of ****)
Now for the comparision I personally have done...my 2v

Car went low 12's at 109 back on the easy coast n/a (298 rwhp....3280 weight)
Mods:
Performance:
Vt stage 2 cams, Densecharger, C&L plenum, Accufab 75mm t/b, steeda pullies, mac lts, mac prochamber, bassani catback

Suspension/Chassis:
Eibach drag launch kit, Tokico illuminas, hpm mega bite jr lca, steeda hardcore double adj uppers, Pa racing mild steel kmember with stock a arms and spring perches, mm c/c plates

Drivetrain:
Fidanza alum flywhee, frpp alum driveshaft, pro motion built t45, steeda triax, frpp 4.30 gears, detriot true track, moser 31 spline axles, arp 3.5" studs

Ok my Ls1 auto car
Mods are 17" zr1s with nitto drag radial, lt's, true duals, lid, 3k stall
Car went 12.5@109 (317rwhp...3650 weight)


Difference the ls1 rans on the west coast in Da's much higher then the 2v did and the 2v had mrore in the suspension never fully dialed it in or reved it past 6500 except first gear. Corrected slips the ls1 tech is a little faster. For arguements sake they are qually as fast. Driveability win goes to the ls1, car is full weight still, lowering springs, reg rims etc (just swapped out to skinnies etc). If anyone is in ny and wants to test out a little 2v I'm sure I can set something up and you will see your *** get handed to you unless you are a full heads and cam car...2v is n/a

edit:

2v timeslip (12.4 was mine 12.5 was a n/a 2v with a built 302 heads, cam, bullitt intake on a nitrous tune)
other is camaros timeslip (12.58)...mustang was atco and camaro was in az at track 1470 above sealevel

Last edited by Ruckus46Gt; 10-29-2008 at 11:27 PM.
Old 10-30-2008, 12:12 AM
  #104  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
FlashLCD33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ponygt65
Now that makes even less sense.

internally they can withstand as much power as an LS1......Roughly 450 rwhp/TQ. Not sure where you're going with this.
450rwhp is a good running heads/cam car. Many do that + a 150 shot. With a set of rod bolts, the LS1 bottom end is usually able to do 600+hp with a good tune and good maintenance.

No idea about the 2v mustangs though, I lack a lot of Ford knowledge
Old 10-30-2008, 12:18 AM
  #105  
TECH Apprentice
 
Quick Sh0t xMLx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so whoever is saying 115-120 on a bolt on 2v with 4.10s is what they top out in 4th gear is full of ****
What? Had a GT(3650) and my 4th gear would be right at 114ish@6000 rpms. Had 4.10s and 26" street tires. Ran 28" DRs at the track though. You can probably bang out to 117 @ 6200 or something.
Old 10-30-2008, 12:37 AM
  #106  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
odarabla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Thats funny, with my Eibach Prokits I was running 1.54 60'. What 60' do you cut at the track?
I cut a 1.49 60 ft. with stock suspension!!
Old 10-30-2008, 12:58 AM
  #107  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Ruckus46Gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Originally Posted by Quick Sh0t xMLx
What? Had a GT(3650) and my 4th gear would be right at 114ish@6000 rpms. Had 4.10s and 26" street tires. Ran 28" DRs at the track though. You can probably bang out to 117 @ 6200 or something.
yea taller tire will allow for more mph, power will dictate it a little, and someone previous said an 00 and that had a t45 which was geared slighly different but not much talking about an mph or 2 not 5 or 10
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...ideoID=3409306
Old 10-30-2008, 01:07 AM
  #108  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by odarabla
I cut a 1.49 60 ft. with stock suspension!!
Back then I didn't have the power to cut a better 60'. I was dumping the clutch off the 7,000rpms rev limiter!
Old 10-30-2008, 08:31 AM
  #109  
Teching In
 
2v-in-12's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weezieanna
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Ruckus46Gt;10387735]etc). If anyone is in ny and wants to test out a little 2v I'm sure I can set something up and you will see your *** get handed to you

Calm down there Tyson.........................Weez just talkin
Old 10-30-2008, 11:00 AM
  #110  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MonmouthCtyLS7
Ls1 would destroy a bolt on 2v from a roll or stop, including 323 auto cars
So a low 13s car gets destroyed by a low 13s car?
Originally Posted by ponygt65

(psst......teksids were only available in 4V's, we are talking 2V's, which ironically are cast iron and can handle more).

I know the Teksid blocks are from the 4Vs, just like the other modular aluminum blocks. It was merely an example of, "The aluminum can handle this, and the iron one is stronger."
Originally Posted by The Manalishi
1000, 1500, and 2000 HP are worlds apart. There are race blocks that have a hard time being durable at the 2000 HP mark and they were supposedly designed for that enviroment.
Yes, but we've all seen the completely stock-engine '03-'04 Cobras that have 1,000hp. There are VERY few differences between that block and the ones in the 2Vs. Yes the ones with 1,500-2,000 are hacked a bit and don't really qualify as "production" motors to you, but have you seen an LSx F-body block that started as a production block and ended up with that much power? That was my point. The block itself is ridiculously strong.
Originally Posted by Stopsign32v




I thought we were talking about 2000hp 2v's. Now we are on 1000hp and 1500hp 4v's?
We were talking about the BLOCKS.
Old 10-30-2008, 12:21 PM
  #111  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
We were talking about the BLOCKS.
But if yall were talking about 2v's then wouldn't it be a good idea to keep on topic of the 2v BLOCK?
Old 10-30-2008, 12:25 PM
  #112  
On The Tree
 
Dynotune04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
But if yall were talking about 2v's then wouldn't it be a good idea to keep on topic of the 2v BLOCK?
Its a cast iron MODULAR block. whats it matter what it has for heads on it.
Old 10-30-2008, 12:43 PM
  #113  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dynotune04
Its a cast iron MODULAR block. whats it matter what it has for heads on it.
Do you understand the difference between the italian teskid aluminum block and the cast iron run of the mill 2v block?

And not to wander off the beaten path but if you think that you can take any 4.6L block and throw some main studs on it and have a block that will handle 2000hp you are very mistaken.


My Mustang buddies have let me down today.
Old 10-30-2008, 12:58 PM
  #114  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Girls have a vagina and boys have a *****.



Can we close this now?
Old 10-30-2008, 01:16 PM
  #115  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ I agree
Old 10-30-2008, 01:18 PM
  #116  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
But if yall were talking about 2v's then wouldn't it be a good idea to keep on topic of the 2v BLOCK?
"I can't find the 2v example I was looking for, but the aluminum Teksid block can handle XXXhp and the iron block is stronger.
Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Do you understand the difference between the italian teskid aluminum block and the cast iron run of the mill 2v block?

My Mustang buddies have let me down today.
I understand that the cast iron in the '03-'04 Cobra is good to over 1,000rwhp without making any changes. And I understand that it's nearly identical to the block in the 2v GTs.
Old 10-30-2008, 01:36 PM
  #117  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Reguardless I don't think anyone here needs to worry about making 2000hp out of a 4.6 anytime soon so I don't know what it matters anyways...moving on.
Old 10-30-2008, 01:52 PM
  #118  
12 Second Club
 
06black6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Manchvegas, NH
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow what a long read, but I have to say whatever this is a ls1 forum
Old 10-30-2008, 01:55 PM
  #119  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06black6spd
wow what a long read, but I have to say whatever this is a ls1 forum
So why are you even here? You don't own a LS1.
Old 10-30-2008, 02:15 PM
  #120  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FlashLCD33
450rwhp is a good running heads/cam car. Many do that + a 150 shot. With a set of rod bolts, the LS1 bottom end is usually able to do 600+hp with a good tune and good maintenance.

No idea about the 2v mustangs though, I lack a lot of Ford knowledge
WHat's your definition of 'many'? Not trying to be a jerk, just clarifying. I haven't seen a single 600rwhp on a factory stock short block (aside from cam) on this site.

Then again, I haven't checked too much into the entire place, so I'm probably just putting a foot in my mouth.

On a side note, I could have sworn LSx have the same hyperUcrappy made rods/pistons as a mach/MGT. No? How do they handle that power level?


Quick Reply: LS1 vs 4.6's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.