Nitrous LT1 vs N/A 5.0
#81
#82
10 Second Club
#88
Yeah... so was I. Modded ones easily go 13.5s
I'd point you to Youtube to show you, but then you'd just call it "internet racing" Anyone however posting a similar video in this forum is legit. Those ones of youtube, those are internet videos.
Hard? No. Easy and as cost effective as a LS1? Certainly not.
What if you want something other than a Fbody.. or even a GM?
Yes, very hard to believe.. Since I have never seen a stock 2V or even simple bolt ons (intake short throw) run a 13.9 or faster. Not on the internet, talking real life.
so the guys with LSx platforms fail to see the novelty or importance of modding them.
#89
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
I'd point you to Youtube to show you, but then you'd just call it "internet racing" Anyone however posting a similar video in this forum is legit. Those ones of youtube, those are internet videos.
I'm not being hypocrytical, I call it as I see it... GM/Ford/Import based, doesn't matter to me.
But yes, to answer your statement... I would call it "internet racing", regardless of what it is.
#90
10 Second Club
Yeah... so was I. Modded ones easily go 13.5s
I'd point you to Youtube to show you, but then you'd just call it "internet racing" Anyone however posting a similar video in this forum is legit. Those ones of youtube, those are internet videos.
Hard? No. Easy and as cost effective as a LS1? Certainly not.
What if you want something other than a Fbody.. or even a GM?
I'd point you to Youtube to show you, but then you'd just call it "internet racing" Anyone however posting a similar video in this forum is legit. Those ones of youtube, those are internet videos.
Hard? No. Easy and as cost effective as a LS1? Certainly not.
What if you want something other than a Fbody.. or even a GM?
#91
Hell, I know people that have freak runs and run a 7.5@93mph when EVERY single other 50-60 passes including the ones that night the fastest has been consistent 7.7s@90mph.. Would I call that a 7.5 car? Hell no, it runs 7.5s, just because it amazingly ran that time one time, regardless of reasons, its not that quick.
The fastest known time for a stock (read fully stock) 2v GT was a 13.6/7. And that's from what *I* know. There could be faster. I would NEVER call that the average times decent drivers can get with 2v. That would be trollish.
Most people that don't know how to drive (The majority of people) are getting 14s in stock 2v.
Most people that DO know how to drive are getting high 13s regularly.
It's the same way with Camaro's. Most Camaro runs I've seen are in the 14s. why? Because most people can't drive. However, those than can .. well we know the results.
Again, I am in no way exaggerating about the performance on my car, or any other 2v GT out there. 13.9 is slow. Hell a decent driver in a stock SRT-4 can run that.
But lets say after all this, you still wont agree. Can you explain to me how it's simply not possible for a car that is rated a 14.0 (By averages) can't hit 13.9s regularly by those that know how to drive? Again, we are talking .1 of a second here. People have done that not even trying.
Really though, if it gets any more silly I'll just invite the many people I know who did 13.9s regularly in a stock GT. I am sure they'll love to be told it's not possible.
*mwaaah* You know I lub you lemonparty.
I guess I just want something more than "Na na na it doesn't run that because I said so"
I really don't think that is too much to ask is it?
Last edited by Ke^in; 01-02-2010 at 09:53 AM.
#92
#93
10 Second Club
#96
Lowered with chrome saleens, or Cobras.
#98
Hell, put your 331 into a new edge and build the 351w for your current heap.
#99