It finally happened, new 5.0 killed me
07-18-2010, 06:15 PM
#81
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one 2010 camaro ran 12.58 one time, let's just have that be known.
07-18-2010, 06:44 PM
#82
The thing is. Is GM going for a more powerful engine? If they go for this then the Camaro will be even more out of reach to the population segment its designed for...This will only increase the Mustang sales more.
They need to come with a new more agile, lighter platform for them to be an option. Perhaps this new Mustang would only accelerate the second dead of the Camaro? GM could just avoid and ignore that class of car and concentrate their efforts in continue licking Obama's *****! This is just my opinion.
They need to come with a new more agile, lighter platform for them to be an option. Perhaps this new Mustang would only accelerate the second dead of the Camaro? GM could just avoid and ignore that class of car and concentrate their efforts in continue licking Obama's *****! This is just my opinion.
07-18-2010, 06:50 PM
#84
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why the dishonesty? I made it clear as to why I came here. And it wasn't to cause problems.
Show me where I said this once. I did not. Again with the dishonesty.
No, not really. Then again gay people have no reason to be defensive around me.
That was a horrible, horrible comparison.
Don't recall saying Ford or GM was "better" You are he only one making such claims.
And you're calling ME a fanboy 
Ah you are one of those people that keep (probably on purpose) forgetting the Mach1, the Cobra, and the Ford GT. All of which either equalled or topped GM's offerings.
Not that I am saying Ford is better. I like both brands.
Your reply to me was full of overzealousness and dishonesty. If your rant was so just you'd not have to revert to such shenanigans.
It's people like you that make actual car enthusiasts cringe.
Try to convince everyone Ford as a whole is equal to GM as a whole performance/reliability/durability wise..
ever notice how defensive Gay people are..
trying to convince society they are morally right by protesting/being activists..Ever see a straight person do that..NO because they know they are morally right..kinda like you being here...
remember I am on my brand's enthusiast's site..not a ferd site arguing why GM is better,I dont need to I know it is!
I am glad the 5.0 is out..Its good to have a little competition for my TRUCK..finally
-As far as me being a fanboy..Hell yeah I am!...Kind of hard not to be when everyone is putting GM motors in there cars(Mustangs remember
and Fords barely broke 300hp
in there na flagship sports car a few years ago..Z06,ZR1,CTS-V,Denali,Escalade,SS nuff said
and Fords barely broke 300hp in there na flagship sports car a few years ago..Z06,ZR1,CTS-V,Denali,Escalade,SS nuff said
Not that I am saying Ford is better. I like both brands.
Your reply to me was full of overzealousness and dishonesty. If your rant was so just you'd not have to revert to such shenanigans.
It's people like you that make actual car enthusiasts cringe.
07-18-2010, 06:53 PM
#85
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The have an advantage mod for mod. But I promise their will be plenty of bolt fbodys beating bolt on 5.0's.
07-18-2010, 06:58 PM
#86
Are you for real?? I mean could you please go back and re-read carefully what this thread about? Im talking about the muscle car/pony car segment of the market. In that segment GM is LOOSING....badly. Guess the ignorant here is you, who cannot even follow a thread. Guess reality is too much for some to handle.
I mean could you please go back and re-read carefully what this thread about? Im talking about the muscle car/pony car segment of the market. In that segment GM is LOOSING....badly. Guess the ignorant here is you, who cannot even follow a thread. Guess reality is too much for some to handle.talking about modding a car is not fair to either gm or ford since customers will have different amounts of money to spend on modding a car, or might want different things. i mean one guy might want boost and another just be able to afford minor bolt ons. if you have the money and it makes you happy then its ok. sales numbers dont show gm loosing. more equal if anything.
just imagine once transformers 3 comes out and the camaro crazy starts back up again.
07-18-2010, 07:38 PM
#87
TECH Apprentice
Nice death OP! I just have to write this, I went to the Ford dealership n they had a blue 2011 5.0 automatic with a window sticker of $31,5xx. That's a great price!
07-18-2010, 07:57 PM
#88
Check how many 3rd gens were sold. Read again. My post was referring at a probable occurrence in the next 3 to 4 years. They have sold well, for now, but that situation is changing, rapidly too.
07-18-2010, 09:23 PM
#90
Administrator
07-18-2010, 09:26 PM
#92
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They really killed the video with the music, anyway...
http://www.mustangheaven.com/2010/st...5-0-in-the-9s/
07-19-2010, 02:25 AM
#93
Again...those numbers are with mods obviously, we are talking about STOCK performance! Its not only weight, think of weight vs power ratio. Also talk about price, didnt GM said the Camaro would be close to the Mustang in value? Bullshit man! Im so tired of the crap GM puts out! Aint you tired of their BS??
What is wrong with another car company making a great modern muscle/pony car? I'm not a GM exclusive enthusiast, I'm a an all around American muscle car guy.
What is wrong with another car company making a great modern muscle/pony car? I'm not a GM exclusive enthusiast, I'm a an all around American muscle car guy.
And yes its only a weight thing because theyre in the same power range so..
No body stated any rules about stock or not; I'm saying that the LS1 or LSX will never be outdated stock or not. Stock LS3 are right on par with 5.0l numbers. Put it on an engine dyno and the power will always be almost the same from each one..so power wise its equal; the weight is the problem.
Nothing wrong about the new Mustang, its obviously better than the day man walked on the moon..Theres a post about it everyday.
07-19-2010, 04:10 AM
#95
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopOJ4Bd88
They really killed the video with the music, anyway...
http://www.mustangheaven.com/2010/st...5-0-in-the-9s/
They really killed the video with the music, anyway...
http://www.mustangheaven.com/2010/st...5-0-in-the-9s/
07-19-2010, 04:39 AM
#96
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
450-470rwhp stock? Give me a break,theyre around 370rwhp stock ,like the LS3. Find me a modded 5.0l that is pushing 500rwhp with H/C pump gas. Sure it will happen soon, but I'm just giving an exemple to show its stupid to say that LS engines are outdated...Way too much Ford fanboism on that outdated statement(not from you Chaman)!!!!!!
And yes its only a weight thing because theyre in the same power range so..
No body stated any rules about stock or not; I'm saying that the LS1 or LSX will never be outdated stock or not. Stock LS3 are right on par with 5.0l numbers. Put it on an engine dyno and the power will always be almost the same from each one..so power wise its equal; the weight is the problem.
Nothing wrong about the new Mustang, its obviously better than the day man walked on the moon..Theres a post about it everyday.
And yes its only a weight thing because theyre in the same power range so..
No body stated any rules about stock or not; I'm saying that the LS1 or LSX will never be outdated stock or not. Stock LS3 are right on par with 5.0l numbers. Put it on an engine dyno and the power will always be almost the same from each one..so power wise its equal; the weight is the problem.
Nothing wrong about the new Mustang, its obviously better than the day man walked on the moon..Theres a post about it everyday.
07-19-2010, 08:51 AM
#97
if the mustang being a tick quicker then a camaro in 2010 is the camaro loosing sales then you dont understand why really drives the sales of both of these cars.
07-19-2010, 09:15 AM
#98
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im not following you around so dont think that haha. car companys are held to a great burden of federal standards. emissions, fuel economy etc. also they appeal to a broader crowd of buyers than just the guy wanting the most performance out of their vehicle. n/a the ls3 will always be more powerful for the reason you stated already more cubes. it is more than on par..just not straight from the factory. cam/bolt on ls3's are just a hair under 500 whp. i dont see the 5.0 gaining that much from internal work. we will see i guess when there are cams for the 5.0.
07-19-2010, 11:43 AM
#99
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopOJ4Bd88
They really killed the video with the music, anyway...
http://www.mustangheaven.com/2010/st...5-0-in-the-9s/
They really killed the video with the music, anyway...
http://www.mustangheaven.com/2010/st...5-0-in-the-9s/
not the same Strictly Performance that was/is a sponsor/scammer/convicted-chop-shop on here though.
07-19-2010, 12:43 PM
#100
Yes the new mustang has better mpg, but its 300lbs lighter..Pin a 300lbs+ trailer to the back of the stang and tell me it has the same mpg..
..its so nice to have less cube; when its pushing great numbers you can brag about how good it is for the cube, but when its down on power, you can always tell ''c'mon its got less cube''...silly you
