It finally happened, new 5.0 killed me
#162
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: earth
dumbest post ever, and thats saying something. Let me find a drag car and post a picture of it on a wheelie bar that has nothing to do with cars being debated and then cleverly post a cliche "/thread" so people think im a leet komputor programmer.
/your ls1tech account for the love of god, you spew more **** then a oil well in the gulf.
anyways... jesus this 5.0 vs ls1 **** is too funny. 5.0 fans are like Ethiopians that havnt eaten in 10 years and finally got some rice from sally struthers or some **** and it is GOOOOD. A 2011 5.0 doch 32v v8 makes more power stock then a ls1 introduced in 97. WHO GIVES A ****. There have been plenty of v8's made since the ls1 came out that make more then 400 horsepower with LESS then 5.0 liters. Ford didnt do anything earth shattering except give it to some of the biggest fan boys ford could ever wish for. Hp/liter wins races again, ricers rejoice!!!
The ls1 has just as much if not more potential then the 5.0 modded. A max effort N/A 5.0 might be able to make 500 rwhp N/A(yet to be proven true or false but i dont believe it will out of 5 liters and still be streetable), the 5.7 ls1 has on the other hand made 500 rwhp N/A and still be run on the street. The more modern ls3 and especially ls7 are in another league of both engines. Argue that all you want but its true. ls7>ls3>ls1 and 5.0. Thats the food chain.
and then I mean look at this ****, comparing, debating, arguing which car was faster or cheaper 15 years ago. REALLY? Are you really arguing this ****? Shut down the computer, and get a life. LOL stock for stock a 5.0 should be faster then a 4th gen, doesnt mean it will dominate every race... Oh no... i thought 4th gens would be the fastest camaros/firebirds(well firebirds maybe ) ever made!!! say it aint so! Since thats settled can we all graduate to 3rd grade now and argue whos daddy can beat up whos daddy?
/your ls1tech account for the love of god, you spew more **** then a oil well in the gulf.
anyways... jesus this 5.0 vs ls1 **** is too funny. 5.0 fans are like Ethiopians that havnt eaten in 10 years and finally got some rice from sally struthers or some **** and it is GOOOOD. A 2011 5.0 doch 32v v8 makes more power stock then a ls1 introduced in 97. WHO GIVES A ****. There have been plenty of v8's made since the ls1 came out that make more then 400 horsepower with LESS then 5.0 liters. Ford didnt do anything earth shattering except give it to some of the biggest fan boys ford could ever wish for. Hp/liter wins races again, ricers rejoice!!!
The ls1 has just as much if not more potential then the 5.0 modded. A max effort N/A 5.0 might be able to make 500 rwhp N/A(yet to be proven true or false but i dont believe it will out of 5 liters and still be streetable), the 5.7 ls1 has on the other hand made 500 rwhp N/A and still be run on the street. The more modern ls3 and especially ls7 are in another league of both engines. Argue that all you want but its true. ls7>ls3>ls1 and 5.0. Thats the food chain.
and then I mean look at this ****, comparing, debating, arguing which car was faster or cheaper 15 years ago. REALLY? Are you really arguing this ****? Shut down the computer, and get a life. LOL stock for stock a 5.0 should be faster then a 4th gen, doesnt mean it will dominate every race... Oh no... i thought 4th gens would be the fastest camaros/firebirds(well firebirds maybe ) ever made!!! say it aint so! Since thats settled can we all graduate to 3rd grade now and argue whos daddy can beat up whos daddy?
#163
Staging Lane
dumbest post ever, and thats saying something. Let me find a drag car and post a picture of it on a wheelie bar that has nothing to do with cars being debated and then cleverly post a cliche "/thread" so people think im a leet komputor programmer.
/your ls1tech account for the love of god, you spew more **** then a oil well in the gulf.
anyways... jesus this 5.0 vs ls1 **** is too funny. 5.0 fans are like Ethiopians that havnt eaten in 10 years and finally got some rice from sally struthers or some **** and it is GOOOOD. A 2011 5.0 doch 32v v8 makes more power stock then a ls1 introduced in 97. WHO GIVES A ****. There have been plenty of v8's made since the ls1 came out that make more then 400 horsepower with LESS then 5.0 liters. Ford didnt do anything earth shattering except give it to some of the biggest fan boys ford could ever wish for. Hp/liter wins races again, ricers rejoice!!!
The ls1 has just as much if not more potential then the 5.0 modded. A max effort N/A 5.0 might be able to make 500 rwhp N/A(yet to be proven true or false but i dont believe it will out of 5 liters and still be streetable), the 5.7 ls1 has on the other hand made 500 rwhp N/A and still be run on the street. The more modern ls3 and especially ls7 are in another league of both engines. Argue that all you want but its true. ls7>ls3>ls1 and 5.0. Thats the food chain.
and then I mean look at this ****, comparing, debating, arguing which car was faster or cheaper 15 years ago. REALLY? Are you really arguing this ****? Shut down the computer, and get a life. LOL stock for stock a 5.0 should be faster then a 4th gen, doesnt mean it will dominate every race... Oh no... i thought 4th gens would be the fastest camaros/firebirds(well firebirds maybe ) ever made!!! say it aint so! Since thats settled can we all graduate to 3rd grade now and argue whos daddy can beat up whos daddy?
/your ls1tech account for the love of god, you spew more **** then a oil well in the gulf.
anyways... jesus this 5.0 vs ls1 **** is too funny. 5.0 fans are like Ethiopians that havnt eaten in 10 years and finally got some rice from sally struthers or some **** and it is GOOOOD. A 2011 5.0 doch 32v v8 makes more power stock then a ls1 introduced in 97. WHO GIVES A ****. There have been plenty of v8's made since the ls1 came out that make more then 400 horsepower with LESS then 5.0 liters. Ford didnt do anything earth shattering except give it to some of the biggest fan boys ford could ever wish for. Hp/liter wins races again, ricers rejoice!!!
The ls1 has just as much if not more potential then the 5.0 modded. A max effort N/A 5.0 might be able to make 500 rwhp N/A(yet to be proven true or false but i dont believe it will out of 5 liters and still be streetable), the 5.7 ls1 has on the other hand made 500 rwhp N/A and still be run on the street. The more modern ls3 and especially ls7 are in another league of both engines. Argue that all you want but its true. ls7>ls3>ls1 and 5.0. Thats the food chain.
and then I mean look at this ****, comparing, debating, arguing which car was faster or cheaper 15 years ago. REALLY? Are you really arguing this ****? Shut down the computer, and get a life. LOL stock for stock a 5.0 should be faster then a 4th gen, doesnt mean it will dominate every race... Oh no... i thought 4th gens would be the fastest camaros/firebirds(well firebirds maybe ) ever made!!! say it aint so! Since thats settled can we all graduate to 3rd grade now and argue whos daddy can beat up whos daddy?
#164
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
You just did the exact same thing again. No substance. No debunking anything I said. Just lame character assassinations that have no merit. Your comments and replies are of desperation. If I was what you claim I was, it wouldn't be hard to dispute me without having to revert to such dishonest actions. That silliness may have worked on others in the past. But it doesn't fly with me.
Sorry it didn't work out the way you planned it.
The only person that was contaminating the thread with non-sense was you.
Lets hope you keep to your word about not replying back. But somehow, I think you wont.
Sorry it didn't work out the way you planned it.
The only person that was contaminating the thread with non-sense was you.
Lets hope you keep to your word about not replying back. But somehow, I think you wont.
#165
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: earth
Man I've read your posts before and I used to think you knew what you were talking about. You proved me wrong. The garbage you're spewing is no different than me saying "Oh yeah well if an LS1 had this and this it would stomp the Mustang!" Your post is just a long novel of how you swing on the LS's nuts and close your eyes when there is another fast car that's not GM. You are a cancer to the car enthusiast world.
#168
More than likely the said same person probably thinks he really got said person "good" by making such a post. When in all actuality said person ends up just looking like a whiney jack-***.
Congratulations on the whiney jackassery.
#169
Staging Lane
lol ok... i thought i said the stock 5.0 would be faster then a 4th gen stock for stock but i guess your right... i completely ignore the mighty 5.0 and didnt hype it enough. Im sorry i put things in a real perspective for you. I never said if this had this or had that, i never said what car was faster with what mods, did I. Never said this would stomp that if it had this. I never tried to down the 5.0 or say its junk. So how did you pull that **** out of your ***? I merely said the ls1 and 5.0 when fully modded would be about equal but the ls1 has proven it can make 500 rwhp, 5.0 hasnt, yet. If that pisses you off i could give a ****. thanks for stopping by.
You posted a ******* "food chain" of engines, of which the 5.0 was on the bottom. You then "predicted" than the new 5.0 won't be able to handle more than 500rwhp and be streetable, you obviously are uneducated on the streetability of the DOHC motors. Guys are running 800 rwhp in DOHC Cobra motors and can sit in traffic with the AC blowing in hot weather. Your post was aimed at making the 5.0 sound overrated and "hyped up". For God's sake, if the new 5.0 doesn't hold up to 500 rwhp then it needs to be driven off a cliff, that would be BARELY more than the old 5.0's could hold up to.
#172
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Person comes in forum. Person responds to well thought out posts by not only calling said person a moron, but attacks their age, and then calls them retarded.
More than likely the said same person probably thinks he really got said person "good" by making such a post. When in all actuality said person ends up just looking like a whiney jack-***.
Congratulations on the whiney jackassery.
More than likely the said same person probably thinks he really got said person "good" by making such a post. When in all actuality said person ends up just looking like a whiney jack-***.
Congratulations on the whiney jackassery.
#173
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Let's recap.
You posted a ******* "food chain" of engines, of which the 5.0 was on the bottom. You then "predicted" than the new 5.0 won't be able to handle more than 500rwhp and be streetable, you obviously are uneducated on the streetability of the DOHC motors. Guys are running 800 rwhp in DOHC Cobra motors and can sit in traffic with the AC blowing in hot weather. Your post was aimed at making the 5.0 sound overrated and "hyped up". For God's sake, if the new 5.0 doesn't hold up to 500 rwhp then it needs to be driven off a cliff, that would be BARELY more than the old 5.0's could hold up to.
You posted a ******* "food chain" of engines, of which the 5.0 was on the bottom. You then "predicted" than the new 5.0 won't be able to handle more than 500rwhp and be streetable, you obviously are uneducated on the streetability of the DOHC motors. Guys are running 800 rwhp in DOHC Cobra motors and can sit in traffic with the AC blowing in hot weather. Your post was aimed at making the 5.0 sound overrated and "hyped up". For God's sake, if the new 5.0 doesn't hold up to 500 rwhp then it needs to be driven off a cliff, that would be BARELY more than the old 5.0's could hold up to.
#174
Why would I have to? I know what I've said.
You've been busted by other members in this forum for swinging from my nuts on other occasions. This one is no different.
What you posted in your last two posts is called verbal masturbation. Meaning it does nothing for anyone but yourself. Your own ego. A self defense mechanism if you will. The first time you attacked me in this forum you acted all cocky thinking you showed me. Then when those posting in said thread busted you for being a complete asshat, you've had it out for me since.
Seriously, put me on ignore. Don't make the rest of the forum have to deal with your obsession with attempting to constantly belittle me. It makes you look like a pathetic thin skinned baby.
So a car that can handle over 500rwhp via turbo or supercharger, wont suddenly be able to handle it N/A?
Really?
Or are you trying to say you don't think that the new 5.0 will be able to hit 500rwhp without boost? I surely hope that's not the case.
Pretty much everything you've said in the last two pages has been incorrect.
Your full of fail plain and simple. So for my amusement please carry on.....
What you posted in your last two posts is called verbal masturbation. Meaning it does nothing for anyone but yourself. Your own ego. A self defense mechanism if you will. The first time you attacked me in this forum you acted all cocky thinking you showed me. Then when those posting in said thread busted you for being a complete asshat, you've had it out for me since.
Seriously, put me on ignore. Don't make the rest of the forum have to deal with your obsession with attempting to constantly belittle me. It makes you look like a pathetic thin skinned baby.
So a car that can handle over 500rwhp via turbo or supercharger, wont suddenly be able to handle it N/A?
Really?
Or are you trying to say you don't think that the new 5.0 will be able to hit 500rwhp without boost? I surely hope that's not the case.
Last edited by Ke^in; 07-21-2010 at 08:22 AM.
#175
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Why would I have to? I know what I've said.
You've been busted by other members in this forum for swinging from my nuts on other occasions. This one is no different.
What you posted in your last two posts is called verbal masturbation. Meaning it does nothing for anyone but yourself. Your own ego. A self defense mechanism if you will. The first time you attacked me in this forum you acted all cocky thinking you showed me. Then when those posting in said thread busted you for being a complete asshat, you've had it out for me since.
Seriously, put me on ignore. Don't make the rest of the forum have to deal with your obsession with attempting to constantly belittle me. It makes you look like a pathetic thin skinned baby.
So a car that can handle over 500rwhp via turbo or supercharger, wont suddenly be able to handle it N/A?
Really?
Or are you trying to say you don't think that the new 5.0 will be able to hit 500rwhp without boost? I surely hope that's not the case.
You've been busted by other members in this forum for swinging from my nuts on other occasions. This one is no different.
What you posted in your last two posts is called verbal masturbation. Meaning it does nothing for anyone but yourself. Your own ego. A self defense mechanism if you will. The first time you attacked me in this forum you acted all cocky thinking you showed me. Then when those posting in said thread busted you for being a complete asshat, you've had it out for me since.
Seriously, put me on ignore. Don't make the rest of the forum have to deal with your obsession with attempting to constantly belittle me. It makes you look like a pathetic thin skinned baby.
So a car that can handle over 500rwhp via turbo or supercharger, wont suddenly be able to handle it N/A?
Really?
Or are you trying to say you don't think that the new 5.0 will be able to hit 500rwhp without boost? I surely hope that's not the case.
#176
If you mean by "me going again" as me busted you for being a complete asshat. Then yes. There I go again.
Having said that, here you go again making posts that have no substance.
You bake what looks to be a nice cake. Too bad it has no substance.
You have no game. None. Zero. Zip. Your posts equal to saying "No, that's you!!"
Here is a webpage for you to read.
http://www.vandruff.com/art_converse.html
Before you embarrass yourself any further, I'd stop a second a take a look at it.
Having said that, here you go again making posts that have no substance.
You bake what looks to be a nice cake. Too bad it has no substance.
You have no game. None. Zero. Zip. Your posts equal to saying "No, that's you!!"
Here is a webpage for you to read.
http://www.vandruff.com/art_converse.html
Before you embarrass yourself any further, I'd stop a second a take a look at it.
#177
Ke^in, you have yet to post anything on this site that has been remotly helpful to anyone. Go join moddedmustang and quit contaminating our threads with your nutt swinging bs. So please do us all a favor and