Hello
These new races
I recorded it before 3 hours only

all information in thr vid.

watch in HD !

1-
2010 Cadillac CTS-V VS Jaguar XFR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW0ZrpLTiLY

2-
2010 Camaro SS VS Jaguar XFR VS Camaro Z28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVJfdJdf9xc

3-
Jaguar XFR VS Cammed Camaro Z28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP4kjV2Tn7A

hope you like it

 

Nice!! That XFR is impressive!!

 

yes
it comes with supercharger 510hp

 

Damn I gotta research that XFR: things moves out amazingly well! Must be an 11 second car to pull on a CTS-V like that.

BTW That LS1 Camaro driver has to be the worst driver in Saudi Arabia! How is it possible to hit the rev limiter so badly, almost every time, WITH AN AUTO?!?!?

 

Some close cars stock! Those results dont look right after reading these comparo's: not to mention that the Jaguar seems to be under rated from the factory (gearing: V has 3.23, jag has 3.31 FYI). Wonder if the jag owner had done a pulley swap?

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mparison_tests
CTS-V/Jag XFR/ E63 AMG:
"Despite the disparate window stickers, everything else—horsepower, weight, terrible fuel economy, even tire width—is nearly identical in this group. Even the acceleration to 100 mph ended up in a three-way tie."

In short, all the accelleration runs below 115mph had them all nearly identical - the 0-150 where the CTS-V really starts pulling, .6 sec faster than the XFR and 1 second over the E63amg.


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html

"With a mere 510 horsepower, the Jaguar's 5.0-liter supercharged V-8 gives up 46 horsepower to the Cadillac's similarly blown 6.2-liter V-8. A 90 pound-feet gap in torque (551 vs 461) separate the two, which is considerable given the XFR's 4378 pound fighting weight. Pound for pound, the Caddy weighs less (100 pounds), and hits harder.

Yet at the track, the two are but an eye blink apart through the quarter-mile. At launch they are even through 30 mph. By 40 mph, the Jaguar is a tenth quicker. At 60 it's a tenth behind (4.4 seconds to the CTS-V's 4.3). That lead holds to 100 mph and past the finish line as the CTS-V clicks off a 12.6 second run at 114.6 mph. The XFR is 7.9 feet behind -- 0.1 second and 0.5 mph slower. They don't get much closer than that."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59fyb...layer_embedded

 

my sister has a 2010 XF premium. she was getting the XFR, it was just more car than they needed. she did drive the XFR. loved it.

 

you just cant believe how luxurious the XF is until you drive it day by day. it IS a better car than the Caddy, even though i will own the caddy over the XFR. I love my cadillac's. we all have our favorites.

 

Damn. Agreed... In the second video he was on the rev limiter so long he lost a car length.

 

I saw an XFR the other day at a hotel I was staying at and Damn that is a sweet car. It is a very good looking car. +1000 on the set up on the camaro HOLY REV LIMITER BATMAN.

 

wow man the videos you post are awesome, the quality and the locations are sick. keep em coming. good runs

 

x2!

I also think that Jag has that car underated, no way its giving up that much HP/TQ and weighing slightly more but still being dead nutts even with the V.

As for the race posted between the two lux's, I would guess the Jag got a good jump on the V and by them being so close the V just didnt have enough street to make up ground.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JsHCCice04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjcTZwFg5As
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSSoOhUWzPA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4cgVXfpQGc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6xQRIuBl1c

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5HJd3Pwtys

 

Cool vids.

I still want a CTS-V

 

thanks guys
more vid are coming

 

Wtf does "before 3 hours only" mean? Something is lost in translation here....and next time, put them all in 1 big vid.

 

Thnaks man , Great HD & Car ( ya m3zbhm )

 

Think he means 3 hours ago...

thats the slowest 2nd gen V I have seen.

Time for some mods when a JAG is beating your ***.

 

guys my English is not good
hours ago...
mean these races happened before 3 hours
mean it's fresh loooooooooooool

 

Agreed. Shitty thing is, I would probably be hard pressed to take out that Jag from a roll. The new cars today are too damned fast! You would think the insurance industry would be screaming bloody murder over the power and speed available today.

For those older guys like me, remember back in the 80's when the insurance companies practically black listed Grand Nationals, then the LT1 Camaro's in '93 for being "too fast"? Your average driver skill level nowadays is a magnitude lower and your average V6 fwd import is nearly as fast as those LT1's and GN's yet the insurance industry is mum on it. lol Guess there bluff was called when every high powered car owner was still alive after the first month of ownership!