Raced a new 5.0
01-10-2011, 03:54 AM
#301
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know im a get flamed but im say it. Local here in a 2v ran a 14.6 with drag radials, FULL boltons. But thats at a crappy track thats usually at 6000DA, where my old lightning ran a 14.4, so if stock lightnings at a lower DA actually run 13.5's-13.9's, then a 2v with full boltons might run 13.7-14.1. Just saying, i know its kinda bench racing, but its somewhat explanatory.
http://forums.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=998283
Went to the track Saturday made a few passes and came out with a 12.77 @ 106!!
mods:
4.10s, full exhaust, intake with plenum, built rear (<--- Note, not full bolt-ons)
1.74 60'
8.13 @ 86
12.7 @ 106
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbQKL5aM5DI
So if a partial bolt-on 2v can take most stock LS1s. A full bolt-on one surely can.
Last edited by Ke^in; 01-10-2011 at 04:02 AM.
01-10-2011, 03:56 AM
#302
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(hope you noticed the sarcasm)
I just want to note, in this thread a lone there have been 3-4 people to have gotten 13s in the 1/4 in a stock 2v. And this isn't even a Mustang board.
But it rarely happens!!11
01-10-2011, 07:51 AM
#304
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"With a good driver a 99-04 gt can run high 13's to low 14's stock."
"A 99-04 mustang gt with a stick does not run a 14.7.The driver must suck.That is what an auto vert gt would run.94-98 gt's run 14.7's not a 99-04.If you don't believe me go over to the mustang fourm and ask.Just about everyone there will say the same high 13's to low 14's for a 99-04 gt manual with a good driver"
"forgot to mention i also pulled a 13.91 at 100 stock with sticky tires. 1.53 sixty foot"
http://www.automotiveforums.com/t224...gt_5_spd_.html
"Significant engine tuning on the '99 4.6-liter modular V-8 has lessened our "all bark, no bite" criticism of Mustangs since '94. At the drag strip, the '99 GT's performance numbers, though great for a Mustang, are still not tops in this muscular crowd. Yet, 0-60 mph in 5.4 seconds and a 14.0-second/100.2-mph quarter-mile run is as good or better than any stock Mustang we've ever tested, Cobra or not. "
http://www.jhammy49.com/Pages/99stanggt.htm
"A 99-04 mustang gt with a stick does not run a 14.7.The driver must suck.That is what an auto vert gt would run.94-98 gt's run 14.7's not a 99-04.If you don't believe me go over to the mustang fourm and ask.Just about everyone there will say the same high 13's to low 14's for a 99-04 gt manual with a good driver"
"forgot to mention i also pulled a 13.91 at 100 stock with sticky tires. 1.53 sixty foot"
http://www.automotiveforums.com/t224...gt_5_spd_.html
"Significant engine tuning on the '99 4.6-liter modular V-8 has lessened our "all bark, no bite" criticism of Mustangs since '94. At the drag strip, the '99 GT's performance numbers, though great for a Mustang, are still not tops in this muscular crowd. Yet, 0-60 mph in 5.4 seconds and a 14.0-second/100.2-mph quarter-mile run is as good or better than any stock Mustang we've ever tested, Cobra or not. "
http://www.jhammy49.com/Pages/99stanggt.htm
01-10-2011, 09:28 AM
#306
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sure if I really wanted to spend a lot of time doing searches I could ;-)
Heck next time I take my car to the track I'll do as many videos as you want.
I was just showing how common the 13.9 was ;-)
Heck next time I take my car to the track I'll do as many videos as you want.
I was just showing how common the 13.9 was ;-)
01-10-2011, 09:31 AM
#307
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a really quick search I found one
The GT lost, but it still got a 13.9 ;-)
http://pages.suddenlink.net/kevin/2004GT139.mpg
The GT lost, but it still got a 13.9 ;-)
http://pages.suddenlink.net/kevin/2004GT139.mpg
01-10-2011, 09:39 AM
#308
Obviously you're just lying Livernois. Because only bolt-on GTs get into the 13s ;-)
(hope you noticed the sarcasm)
I just want to note, in this thread a lone there have been 3-4 people to have gotten 13s in the 1/4 in a stock 2v. And this isn't even a Mustang board.
But it rarely happens!!11
(hope you noticed the sarcasm)
I just want to note, in this thread a lone there have been 3-4 people to have gotten 13s in the 1/4 in a stock 2v. And this isn't even a Mustang board.
But it rarely happens!!11
I know that 2V's can get in the 13's stock. My buddy had a 99 GT Coupe that went 13.99 stock.
-Rick
01-10-2011, 10:59 AM
#311
Just a really quick search I found one
The GT lost, but it still got a 13.9 ;-)
http://pages.suddenlink.net/kevin/2004GT139.mpg
The GT lost, but it still got a 13.9 ;-)
http://pages.suddenlink.net/kevin/2004GT139.mpg
01-10-2011, 03:31 PM
#314
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I am saying is, I will probably will have said exhaust on before it gets racing weather. Believe it or not the short throw does make things a bit more fun and easier. I wonder if it actually effects 1/4 time that much.
I MIGHT get 5-7rwhp from the exhaust tops.
I MIGHT get 5-7rwhp from the exhaust tops.
01-10-2011, 04:07 PM
#315
If I were you my goal would be 13.3 with ONLY mods you mentioned. Then I would throw axles, struts and launch springs, UCAs, and some 17" DRs and then hit 12's and shut alot of people up. But thats me...
01-10-2011, 04:16 PM
#317
. No way a 2V went that fast. 
01-10-2011, 04:21 PM
#319
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shut a lot of people up with high 12's? Is that what your implying?
01-10-2011, 04:27 PM
#320
